Advertisement

Human Machine Interaction

  • Zeljko Medenica
Chapter
Part of the Wireless Networks book series (WN)

Abstract

The main intention of this chapter is to describe what Human Machine Interaction (HMI) is, why it is important in the automotive context and how connected vehicles can benefit from it.

References

  1. 1.
    Z. Medenica and A. L. Kun, Comparing the Influence of Two User Interfaces for Mobile Radios on Driving Performance, in Proc. Driving Assessment 2007. 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. D. Salvucci, D. Merkley, M. Zuber, and D. P. Brumby, iPod Distraction: Effects of Portable Music-Player Use on Driver Performance, in Proc. CHI 2007. 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Stutts, D. W. Reinfurt, L. Staplin, and E. A. Rodgman, The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. G. Klauer, T. A. Dingus, V. L. Neale, J. D. Sudweeks, and D. J. Ramsey, The Impact of Driver Inattention On Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC, Technical report DOT HS 810 594. 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. L. Strayer, F. A. Drews, and D. J. Crouch, A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 48, no. 2. 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2013).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 9241-210:2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction -- Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindgren, A and Chen, F. State of the art analysis: An overview of advanced driver assistance systems (adas) and possible human factors issues. Human factors and economics aspects on safety, (2006).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.P. Bliss and S.A. Acton, Alarm Mistrust in Automobiles: How Collision Alarm Reliability Affects Driving, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 34, pp. 499–509, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D., Hayes, E. (2004). Collision Warning Design to Mitigate Driver Distraction. Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Conference, April 24–29, Vienna, Austria, 65–72.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiefer, R., LeBlanc, D., Palmer, M., Salinger, J., Deering, R., Shulman, M. Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems, Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership, Washington DC, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spence, C. and Ho, C. Tactile and Multisensory Spatial Warning Signals for Drivers. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato, K., Goto, T., Kubota, Y., Amano, Y. A Study on a Lane Departure Warning System Using a Steering Torque as a Warning Signal, Proceedings of the International Symposium On Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC ’98), pp. 479–484, Tokyo, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.B.F. Van Erp and H.A.H.C. van Veen, Vibrotactile In-Vehicle Navigation System, Transportation Research Part F, vol. 7, pp. 247–256, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borojeni, S., Chuang, L., Heuten, W., and Boll, S. Assisting Drivers with Ambient Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2016.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baldwin, C.L. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance. Ergonomics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 328–337, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carryl L. Baldwin and Bridget A. Lewis. Perceived urgency mapping across modalities within a driving context. Applied ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1270–1277, 2014.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ioannis Politis, Stephen A Brewster, and Frank Pollick. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4067–4076, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campbell, J. L., Brown. J. L., Graving, J. S., Richard, C. M., Lichty, M. G., Sanquist, T., … & Morgan, J. L. Human factors design guidance for driver-vehicle interfaces (Report No. DOT HS 812 360). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2016.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baber, C. Psychological aspects of in-car warning devices. In: Stanton, N. (Ed.), Human Factors in Alarm Design. Taylor & Francis, London, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. L. Wiener and R. E. Curry. Flight-deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 995–1011, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Breznitz, S. Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horowitz, A. D., & Dingus, T. A. Warning signal design: A key human factors issue in an in-vehicle front-to-rear-end collision warning system. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 1011–1013, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.D. Power. 2015 Driver Interactive Vehicle Experience (DrIVE) Report 2015.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bhise, Vivek D. Ergonomics in the automotive design process. Boca Raton, Fla., CRC Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sabine Langlois. ADAS HMI Using Peripheral Vision. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Christine Döttlinger, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. ChaseLight: Ambient LED Stripes to Control Driving Speed. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andreas Löcken, Heiko Müller, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. “Should I Stay or Should I Go?”: Different Designs to Support Drivers’ Decision Making. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, 2014.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    John D. Lee, Cher Carney, Steven M. Casey, and John L. Campbell. In-Vehicle Display Icons and Other Information Elements: Preliminary Assessment of Visual Symbols. US DOT, Federal Highway Administration. Publication no. FHWA-RD-99-196, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gish, K.W., Staplin, L. Human factors aspects of using head-up displays in automobiles: a review of the literature. NHTSA: DOT HS 808 320, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Naujoks, F, Mai, C and Neukum, A. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE, 2014.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saffarian, M., Happee, R., Abbink, D., and Mulder, M. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 43, pp. 25–30, 2010.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kaufmann, C, Risser, R, and Geven, A. Effects of simultaneous multi-modal warnings and traffic information on driver behaviour, Proceedings of European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baldwin, C. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance. Ergonomics. 54, 4, pp. 328–337, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baldwin, C. and May, J. Loudness interacts with semantics in auditory warnings to impact rear-end collisions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 14, 1, pp. 36–42, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baldwin, C. L. Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory–cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(4), pp. 307–329, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ho, C. and Spence, C. Assessing the Effectiveness of Various Auditory Cues in Capturing a Driver’s Visual Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 11, 3, pp. 157–174, 2005.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graham, R. Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: Evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics, 42, pp. 1233–1248, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. Bruce Goldstein, Sensation and Perception, 8th Edition, 2010.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Kern, P. Marshall, E. Hornecker, Y. Rogers, and A. Schmidt. Enhancing navigation information with tactile output embedded into the steering wheel. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5538 LNCS, 1, 42–58, 2009.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Enriquez, O. Afonin, B. Yager, and K. Maclean. A Pneumatic Tactile Alerting System for the Driving Environment. Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Percetive user interfaces - PUI ’01, 1–7, 2001.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gözel Shakeri, Alexander Ng, John H. Williamson, and Stephen A. Brewster. Evaluation of Haptic Patterns on a Steering Wheel. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2016.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sato, K., Goto, T., Kubota, Y., Amano, Y., Fukui, K. A Study on a Lane Departure Warning System Using a Steering Torque as a Warning Signal. International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC), pp. 479–484, 1998.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Beruscha, F., Augsburg, K. and Manstetten, D. Haptic warning signals at the steering wheel: A literature survey regarding lane departure warning systems. Haptics-e, the electronic journal of haptic research. 4, 5, 2011.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Petermeijer, S., Abbink, D., Mulder, M. and Winter, J. The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 8, 4, 467–479, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    K. Suzuki and H. Jansson, An Analysis of Driver’s Steering Behaviour during Auditory or Haptic Warnings for the Designing of Lane Departure Warning System, JSAE Rev., vol. 24, pp. 65–70, 2003.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Gallace, H. Z. Tan, and C. Spence. Numerosity judgments for tactile stimuli distributed over the body surface. Perception, vol. 35, issue 2, pp. 247–266, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. Yoshida et al. Study on Stimulation Effects for Driver Based on Fragrance Presentation. IAPR Conference on Machine Vision Applications, Nara, Japan, 2011.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    R. A. Baron and M. J. Kalsher. Effects of a Pleasant Ambient Fragrance on Simulated Driving Performance: The Sweet Smell of... Safety? Environment and Behavior, vol 30, issue 4, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    D. V. McGehee and M. Raby, Snowplow Lane Awareness System, Final Report prepared for the 3M Company and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, 2002.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    C. D. Wickens, Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 159–177, 2002.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    R. D. Colonel O’Donnell and F. T. Eggemeier, Workload Assessment Methodology, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. II, Cognitive Processes and Performance. K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    R. M. Yerkes and J. D. Dodson, The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation, Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 459–482, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    D. L. Strayer and F. A. Drews, Multi-tasking in the automobile, in A. Kramer, D. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Applied attention: From theory to practice, 121–133, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems, including 2006 updated sections (Report of the Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group), 2006.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    G. Shakeri, A. Ng, and S. A. Brewster. Evaluating Haptic Feedback on a Steering Wheel in a Simulated Driving Scenario. In CHI EA ’16, 2016.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. Enriquez, O. Afonin, B. Yager, and K. Maclean. A Pneumatic Tactile Alerting System for the Driving Environment. Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces - PUI ’01, 1–7, 2001.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Spence, C. and Ho, C.: Tactile and multisensory spatial warning signals for drivers. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 1, no. 2, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Florian Laquai, Fabian Chowanetz, and Gerhard Rigoll. A large-scale LED array to support anticipatory driving. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. pp. 2087–2092, 2011.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Marcel Walch, Nina Lang, and Martin Baumann. Elaborating Feedback Strategies for Maintaining Automation in Highly Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive’UI 16), pp. 105–112, 2016.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wu, Kun-Feng & Ardiansyah, Nashir & Ye, Wei-Jyun. An Evaluation Scheme for Assessing the Effectiveness of Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) on Improving Traffic Safety. Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 16, pp. 1–5. 2017.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Todd, J.W. Reaction time to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology, vol. 3, issue 25, pp. 1–65. 1912.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, and Frank Pollick. Evaluating multimodal driver displays of varying urgency. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 2013.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    X. Wu et al., Cars Talk to Phones: A DSRC Based Vehicle-Pedestrian Safety System, 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall), Vancouver, BC, 2014.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jeremiah Singer, Neil Lerner, Carryl Baldwin, and Eric Traube. Auditory Alerts in Vehicles: Effects of Alert Characteristics and Ambient Noise Conditions on Perceived Meaning and Detectability. 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. 2015.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Steven Bayless, Adrian Guan, Jessa Paruch, Jennifer Carter, Tom Schaffnit, and Anthony Shaw. The Impact of a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications Rulemaking on Growth in the DSRC Automotive Aftermarket: A Market Adoption Model and Forecast for Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) for Light and Heavy Vehicle Categories. US DOT. Report number FHWA-JPO-17-487. 2016.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Britannia Rescue, Dashboard warning lights confuse drivers. Public poll released on July 31, 2013. Link: https://www.lv.com/about-us/press/article/dashboard-warning-lights-confuse-drivers, retrieved 10/30/2017.
  68. 68.
    Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan H. Feng, Harry Hochheiser. Research methods in human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeljko Medenica
    • 1
  1. 1.BirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations