Advertisement

Using Crowdsourcing for the Development of Online Emotional Support Agents

  • Lenin MedeirosEmail author
  • Tibor Bosse
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 887)

Abstract

This paper describes several steps towards the development of an online agent (or socialbot) that provides emotional support to stressed users. In particular, we present an empirical study that was conducted with the aim to investigate how people help each other to cope with stressful situations via online social networks. To this end, around 10.000 tweets about stressful situations were collected. Then, using crowdsourcing, these tweets were classified into stress categories, and supportive replies to them were collected, which were also classified into categories. Contingency tables were constructed in order to explore which types of support were most frequently used in which circumstances. The resulting values can be used as parameters for a previously developed algorithm that automatically constructs support messages. This allows our agent to generate supportive messages that are more similar to the support messages that human beings send via social media.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian government and to state that Lenin Medeiros’ stay at VU Amsterdam was funded by Science without Borders/CNPq (reference number: 235134/2014-7).

References

  1. 1.
    Burks, N., Martin, B.: Everyday problems and life change events: ongoing versus acute sources of stress. J. Hum. Stress 11(1), 27–35 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heaney, C.A., Israel, B.A.: Social networks and social support. In: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 189–210 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braithwaite, D.O., Waldron, V.R., Finn, J.: Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Commun. 11(2), 123–151 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walther, J.B., Boyd, S.: Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In: Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses, pp. 153–188 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright, K.B., Bell, S.B.: Health-related support groups on the internet: linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. J. Health Psychol. 8(1), 39–54 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox, S.: Peer-to-peer Healthcare. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Breda, W., Treur, J., van Wissen, A.: Analysis and support of lifestyle via emotions using social media. In: Aberer, K., Flache, A., Jager, W., Liu, L., Tang, J., Guéret, C. (eds.) SocInfo 2012. LNCS, vol. 7710, pp. 275–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quan-Haase, A., Young, A.L.: Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of facebook and instant messaging. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 30(5), 350–361 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Medeiros, L., Sikkes, R., Treur, J.: Modelling a mutual support network for coping with stress. In: Nguyen, N.-T., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9875, pp. 64–77. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45243-2_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Zwaan, J.M., Dignum, V., Jonker, C.M.: A conversation model enabling intelligent agents to give emotional support. In: Ding, W., Jiang, H., Ali, M., Li, M. (eds.) Modern Advances in Intelligent Systems and Tools, pp. 47–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30732-4_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medeiros, L., Bosse, T.: An empathic agent that alleviates stress by providing support via social media. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1634–1636. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medeiros, L., Bosse, T.: Testing the acceptability of social support agents in online communities. In: Nguyen, N.T., Papadopoulos, G.A., Jędrzejowicz, P., Trawiński, B., Vossen, G. (eds.) ICCCI 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10448, pp. 125–136. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67074-4_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kindness, P., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: Designing emotional support messages tailored to stressors. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 97, 1–22 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gross, J.J.: Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 39(3), 281–291 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gross, J.J.: Emotion Regulation: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medeiros, L., Bosse, T.: Empirical analysis of social support provided via social media. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10047, pp. 439–453. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, H.S., Sherman, D.K., Taylor, S.E.: Culture and social support. Am. Psychol. 63(6), 518 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen, S., Wills, T.A.: Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. Bull. 98(2), 310 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cobb, S.: Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom. Med. 38(5), 300–314 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Caplan, S.E., Turner, J.S.: Bringing theory to research on computer-mediated comforting communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(2), 985–998 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    White, M., Dorman, S.M.: Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Educ. Res. 16(6), 693–707 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., Simmons, R., Snipes, K., Schultz, A.C., et al.: Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (IROS 2005), pp. 1338–1343. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Paiva, A.: The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 71(3), 250–260 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith, A., Brenner, J.: Twitter use 2012. Pew Internet & American Life Project, vol. 4 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Williams, M.: Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: a threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(2), 595–621 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burleson, B.R.: Emotional support skills. In: Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, pp. 551–594 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spottswood, E.L., Walther, J.B., Holmstrom, A.J., Ellison, N.B.: Person-centered emotional support and gender attributions in computer-mediated communication. Hum. Commun. Res. 39(3), 295–316 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Informatics GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations