Advertisement

The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots

  • Adrian David Cheok
  • Emma Yann ZhangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

The ethical aspects of robotics have recently gained sufficient importance to be debated in international forums and to be endowed with their own collective nametag—roboethics. Almost all of the discussion within the roboethics community and elsewhere has thus far centred on questions of the form: “Is it ethical to develop and use robots for such-and-such a purpose?”, questions based upon doubts about the effect that a particular type of robot is likely to have, both on society in general and on those with whom the robots will interact in particular. What has usually been missing from the debate is the complementary question: “Is it ethical to treat robots in such-and-such a way?” Here we attempt to redress the balance, having first reviewed some of the relevant literature.

References

  1. 1.
    Aleksander I (1995) Artificial neuroconsciousness an update. From natural to artificial neural computation, pp 566–583Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arkin RC, Moshkina L (2007) Lethality and autonomous robots: An ethical stance. In: IEEE International symposium on technology and society, 2007. ISTAS 2007. IEEE, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calverley D (2005a) Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In: AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment, University of Hertfordshire, HatfieldGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calverley DJ (2005b) Android science and the animal rights movement: are there analogies. In: Cognitive sciences society workshop, Stresa, Italy, pp 127–136Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chella A, Manzotti R (2007) Artificial consciousness. Imprint AcademicGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark RE, Squire LR (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280(5360):77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark RE, Squire LR (1999) Human eyeblink classical conditioning: effects of manipulating awareness of the stimulus contingencies. Psychol Sci 10(1):14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clowes R, Torrance S, Chrisley R (2007) Machine consciousness. J Conscious Stud 14(7):7–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Quincey C (2006) Switched-on consciousness: clarifying what it means. J Conscious Stud 13(4):7–12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Economist T (2007) Robot wars. The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/9249201
  11. 11.
    Freitas RA (1985) The legal rights of robots. Stud Lawyer 13(1):54–56Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freud S, Sprott WJH, Strachey J (1933) New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, vol 22. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gallup GG (1977) Self recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychol 32(5):329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holland O (2003) Machine consciousness. Imprint AcademicGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts and Company PublishersGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy D (2005) Robots unlimited: life in a virtual age. A. K. Peters Ltd., WellesleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levy D (2007a) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. PhD thesis, Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levy D (2007b) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Owen J, Osley R (2007) Bill of rights for abused robots. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/bill-of-rights-for-abused-robots-5332596.html
  20. 20.
    Pinker S (1997) Could a computer ever be conscious? US News World Rep 123(7)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramey CH (2005) “For the sake of others”: the personal ethics of human–android interaction. In: Proceedings of the CogSci 2005 workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science, pp 137–148Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sloman A (1996) A systematic approach to consciousness. (how to avoid talking nonesense?). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/consciousness.rsa.text
  23. 23.
    Solum LB (1991) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. NCL Rev 70:1231Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? the future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takeno J, Inaba K, Suzuki T (2005) Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: 2005 IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 493–498Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Torrance S (2004) Could we, should we, create conscious robots? In: Health, social and environmental issues, p 43Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. Ai Soc 22(4):495–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Veruggio G (2006) The euron roboethics roadmap. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots. IEEE, pp 612–617Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Imagineering InstituteIskander PuteriMalaysia

Personalised recommendations