Advertisement

Engagement for What Purpose? Engagement Toward What Outcome? Empowering Engagement for Students from Challenging Backgrounds

  • Clarence Ng
  • Brendan Bartlett
  • Stephen N. Elliott
Chapter

Abstract

This final chapter reflects on the discussion throughout this book and provides a summary of what has preceded. It highlights key factors and variables that are essential for developing empowering classroom practices and innovative pedagogical models for promoting learning engagement among students who come from disadvantaged backgrounds or are affected by challenging conditions. The discussion highlights the need for developing practices and supports that create an empowering context for promoting learning engagement for these students. Such a transformative practice is characterized by constant attempts to address personal needs, facilitate the development of cognitive enablers, and manage sociocultural, institutional, and classroom influences and demands in a way that will enable students from at-risk backgrounds to recognize and positively respond to learning opportunities. In this chapter, we point to the need for teachers to be engaged continually in reflective practices in order to develop, evaluate, and improve empowering models and practices aimed at meeting the needs of at-risk students coming from various disadvantaged backgrounds.

Keywords

Engagement Disengagement Empowerment Disadvantaged students Educational disadvantage Educational marginalization Intervention 

References

  1. Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2015). Exploring gender difference in motivation, engagement and enrolment behaviour of senior secondary physics students in New South Wales. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2009). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 69–90). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, D. (2016). Education and Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioural characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80(2), 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  7. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.Google Scholar
  9. Anderman, L. H. (2003). Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students’ sense of school belonging. Journal of Experimental Education, 72(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  10. Ang, R., & Hughes, J. (2001). Differential benefits of skills training with antisocial youth based on group composition: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 31, 164–185.Google Scholar
  11. Anlezark, A. (2011). Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth (LSAY) Briefing Paper 24. At risk youth: a transitory state? Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv45730
  12. Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Archambault, I., Vandenbossche-Makombo, J., & Fraser, S. L. (2017). Students’ oppositional behaviors and engagement in school: The differential role of the student-teacher relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(6), 1702–1712.Google Scholar
  14. Archbold, S., Ng, Z. Y., Harrigan, S., Gregory, S., Wakefield, T., Holland, L., & Mulla, I. (2015). Experiences of young people with mild to moderate hearing loss: Views of parents and teachers. The Ear Foundation Report to National Deaf Children’s Society (UK). http://www.ndcs.org.uk/document.rm?id=10331
  15. Aron, L. (2003). Towards a typology of alternative education programs: A compilation of elements from the literature. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Aron, L. Y. (2006). An overview of alternative education. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Aron, L. Y., & Zweig, J. (2003). Educational alternatives for vulnerable youth: Student needs, program types and research directions. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., & Nurmi, J. E. (2006). Developmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teachers’ goals during the transition to primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012, June). Australian social trends. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/
  22. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2014). Schools Australia 2014. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4221.02014?OpenDocument
  23. Australian Government Productivity Commission Corrective Services (2016, January). Report on government services 2016. Retrieved from www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2016/justice/corrective-services
  24. Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY). (2008). Preventing youth disengagement and promoting engagement Australian research alliance for children & youth. https://www.aracy.org.au/publications-resources/command/download_file/id/120/filename/Preventing_Youth_Disengagement_and_Promoting_Engagement.pdf
  25. Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94.Google Scholar
  26. Baddeley, A. (1994). The magical number seven: Still magic after all these years? Psychological Review, 101(2), 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of Children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Baker, M. I. (2002). Reading resistance in middle school: What can be done? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(5), 364–366.Google Scholar
  30. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.Google Scholar
  32. Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358.Google Scholar
  33. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016a). Pedagogic voice: Student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Baroutsis, A., Mills, M., McGregor, G., Riele, K., & Hayes, D. (2016b). Student voice and the community forum: Finding ways of ‘being heard’ at an alternative school for disenfranchised young people. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 438–453.Google Scholar
  38. Barrington, F. (2013). Update on the year 12 mathematics student numbers. Melbourne: AMSI.Google Scholar
  39. Barrish, H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(5), 706–722.Google Scholar
  41. Bartlett, B. (2016a). Looking inwards: How a GABEK® Analysis of transcripts informed revision of social enterprise practices at BoysTown. In J. Mueller & J. Zelger (Eds.), Gabek VII - GABEK als Lernverfahren fÃπr Organisationen - GABEK as a learning procedure for organizations (pp. 189–206). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Bartlett, B. (2016b). Staff and youths’ accounts of social enterprise programs at BoysTown. In J. Mueller & J. Zelger (Eds.), Gabek VII - GABEK als Lernverfahren fÃπr Organisationen - GABEK as a learning procedure for organizations (pp. 189–204). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag..Google Scholar
  43. Bartlett, B. J., Mafi, S., & Dalgleish, J. (2012). When decision-making becomes more socially-responsible: Personal and national gains through greater sustainability in jobs and wellbeing amongst once-disaffected youth. In J. Zelger, J. Müller, & S. Plangger (Eds.), GABEK VI. Sozial verantwortliche Entscheidungsprozesse. Socially responsible decision making processes (pp. 175–206). Innsbruck/Wien/Bozen: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Bartlett, B. J., Ng, C., Jackson, C., & Hwang, Y.-S. (2015). Final report: A study into the current operations of Queensland’s non-state special assistance schools, state positive learning centres and state flexi-schools. Brisbane, QLD: Department of Education, Training and Employment.Google Scholar
  45. BBC. (2016). Migrant crisis: Migration to Europe explained in seven charts. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
  46. Beddow, P. A. (2018). Attending to cognitive load in the design of accessible tests. In S. N. Elliott, R. J. Kettler, P. A. Beddow, & A. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook of accessible testing and instructional practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Beddow, P. A., Elliott, S. N., & Kettler, R. J. (2009). TAMI accessibility rating matrix. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  48. Beddow, P. A., Kettler, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Test accessibility and modification inventory. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  49. Beelmann, A., Pfingsten, U., & Losel, F. (1994). Effects of training social competence in children: A meta-analysis of recent evaluation studies. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23(3), 260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2303_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Berliner, D. (2013). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America’s youth. Teachers College Record, 115(12), 1–26.Google Scholar
  51. Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66(5), 1312–1329.Google Scholar
  52. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  53. Blackberry, G., & Ng, C. (2016). Reading was like my nightmare but now it’s my thing: A narrative of growth and change. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading in the 21st century: International research and innovations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Blackorby, J., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Davies, E., Levine, P., Newman, L., Marder, C., & Sumi, C. (2005). Engagement, academics, and social adjustment, and independence: The achievements of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/designdocs/engagement/All_SEELS_outcomes_10-04-05.pdf
  55. Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating Twenty-First-Century self-determined learners. In B. Gros & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 25–40). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2012). Student disengagement in relation to expected and unexpected educational pathways. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2014). Parenting in relation to school dropout through student engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 778–795.Google Scholar
  58. Bloom, D. (2010). Programs and policies to assist high school dropouts in the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 89–108.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Boekaerts, M., & Pekrun, R. (2015). Emotions and emotion regulation in academic settings. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 76–90). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Bonaccio, S., & Reeve, C. L. (2010). The nature and relative importance of students’ perceptions of the sources of test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 617–625.Google Scholar
  61. Bong, M. (2001). Between-and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Borman, G. D., & Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. BoysTown. (2011). BoysTown annual report 2010. Retrieved 21 March 2016, from http://www.boystown.com.au/downloads/BTAnnualReport2011.pdf
  65. Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., Debnam, K. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2014). Measuring school climate in high schools: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of School Health, 84(9), 593–604.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Bragg, S. (2001). Taking a joke: Learning from the voices we don’t want to hear. Forum, 43(2), 70–73.Google Scholar
  67. Bragg, S. (2010). Consulting young people: A literature review. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education.Google Scholar
  68. Brint, S. (2017). Schools and societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2009). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Brydsten, A., Hammarström, A., & San Sebastian, M. (2016). The impact of economic recession on the association between youth unemployment and functional somatic symptoms in adulthood: a difference-in-difference analysis from Sweden. BMC Public Health, 16, 230.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J., Bell, E. R., Romero, S. L., & Carter, T. M. (2012). Preschool interactive peer play mediates problem behavior and learning for low-income children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–34.Google Scholar
  74. Caldarella, P., & Merrell, K. (1997). Common dimensions of social skills in children and adolescents: A taxonomy of positive social behaviors. School Psychology Review, 26(2), 264–278.Google Scholar
  75. Cambourne, B. (2001). Conditions for literacy learning: Why do some students fail to learn to read? Ockham’s razor and the conditions of learning. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 784–786.Google Scholar
  76. Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly communicated and self-generated utility-value information. Motivation Science, 1(1), 47–71.  https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302–306.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Carr, M. (2011). Young children reflecting on their learning: Teachers’ conversation strategies. Early Years, 31(3), 257–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.613805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.Google Scholar
  80. Carver, P. R., Lewis, L., Tice, P. (2010). Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure: 2007-08. First Look. NCES 2010-026. Accessed July 2016, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508882.pdf
  81. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181.Google Scholar
  82. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Chabanet, D., & Faniel, J. (2012). The mobilization of the unemployed in a comparative perspective. In D. Chabanet & J. Faniel (Eds.), The mobilization of the unemployed in Europe: From acquiescence to protest? (pp. 1–28). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  84. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s self-concepts: An examination of emerging sub-components and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Chen, C. H. (2017). Unequal education, unequal citizen? A comparative perspective on equality in education. Philosophy, 7(5), 237–247.Google Scholar
  87. Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Chouinard, R., Karsenti, T., & Roy, N. (2007). Relations among competence beliefs, utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Chouinard, R., & Roy, N. (2008). Changes in high-school students’ competence beliefs, utility value and achievement goals in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Cillessen, A., & van den Berg, Y. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  92. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  93. Cochrane, F. (2015). Migration and security in the global age. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  94. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  95. Cohen, J. S., & Mendez, J. L. (2009). Emotion regulation, language ability, and the stability of preschool children’s peer play behavior. Early Education & Development, 20(6), 1016–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Colclough, C. (2012). Education, poverty and development – mapping their interconnections. Comparative Education, 48(2), 135–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.608891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Comber, B. (2016). Poverty, place and pedagogy in education: Research stories from front-line workers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(4), 393–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0212-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Compton-Lilly, C. (2006). Identity, childhood culture, and literacy learning: A case study. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Compton-Lilly, C. (2007). The complexities of reading capital in two Puerto Rican families. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 72–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Conduct Disorder Prevention Group. (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Conduct Disorder Prevention Group. (2002). Evaluation of the first 3 years of the fast track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 301(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  103. Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 61–67). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  104. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. 23. Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  105. Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Cooc, N., Kim, J. S., & Graham, S. (2017). Peer influence on children’s reading skills: A social network analysis of elementary school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 727–740.Google Scholar
  107. Cook, C. R., Gresham, F. M., Kern, L., Barreras, R. B., Thornton, S., & Crews, S. D. (2008). Social skills training for secondary students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders: A review and analysis of the meta-analytic literature. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(6), 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Cook-Sather, A. (2007). What would happen if we treated students as those with opinions that matter? The benefits to principals and teachers of supporting youth engagement in school. NASSP bulletin, 91(4), 343–362.Google Scholar
  110. Coolahan, K. C., Fantuzzo, J., Mendez, J., & McDermott, P. (2000). Preschool peer interactions and readiness to learn: Relationships between classroom peer play and learning behaviors and conduct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 458–465.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Corner, L. (2017). To identify a relationship between the knowledge and attitudes of primary school teachers towards children with speech, language and communication difficulties within mainstream education (Doctoral dissertation). Cardiff Metropolitan University, Wales.Google Scholar
  112. Côté-Lussier, C., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2016). Feelings of safety at school, socioemotional functioning, and classroom engagement. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 543–550.Google Scholar
  113. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Crowe, E. C., Connor, C. M., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Examining the core: Relations among reading curricula, poverty, and first through third grade reading achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 47(3), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  116. Dagley, V. (2004). Making the invisible visible: A methodological and a substantive issue. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 613–630.Google Scholar
  117. Daniels, D. H., Kalkman, D. L., & McCombs, B. L. (2001). Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: Implications for motivation. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Davies, M., Cooper, G., Kettler, R., & Elliott, S. N. (2014). Developing social skills of students with additional needs within the context of the Australian Curriculum. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 37–55.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2014.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Davies, M. D., Elliott, S. N., & Cumming, J. (2016). Documenting support needs and adjustment gaps for students with disabilities: Teacher practices in Australian classrooms and on national tests. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(12), 1252–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1159256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 861–880.Google Scholar
  121. De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2013). The relation of student and class-level characteristics to primary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: A multi-level approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 351–370.Google Scholar
  122. Debnam, K. J., Johnson, S. L., Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2014). Equity, connection, and engagement in the school context to promote positive youth development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(3), 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Debue, N., & Van De Leemput, C. (2014). What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). The development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17(3), 207–225.  https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299901700302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 293–298.Google Scholar
  127. DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2015). Efficacy of the social skills improvement system classwide intervention program (SSIS-CIP) primary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 123–141.  https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2016). Effects of a universal positive classroom behavior program on student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 53(2), 189–203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Cheng, W., Hart, S., & Bellinger, J. (2017). A cluster randomized trial of the social skills improvement system-classwide intervention program (SSIS-CIP) in first grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 298–312.Google Scholar
  131. DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2005). A model of academic enablers and mathematics achievement in the elementary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 43(5), 379–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool “PATHS” curriculum. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28(2), 67–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-007-0081-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.Google Scholar
  135. Dwyer, P. J. (2004). Agency, dependency, and welfare: Beyond issues of claim and contribution. In H. Dean (Ed.), The ethics of welfare: Human rights, dependency and responsibility (pp. 135–154). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  136. Eccles, J., & Wang, M. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  137. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  139. Eichhorst, W., Hinte, H., & Rinne, U. (2013). Youth unemployment in Europe: What to do about it? (No. 65). IZA policy paper. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/91749/1/pp65.pdf
  140. Elliott, S. N., Barnard, J., & Gresham, F. M. (1989). Preschoolers’ social behavior: Teachers’ and parents’ assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 7(3), 223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298900700304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Elliott, S. N., & Bartlett, B. J. (2016). Opportunity to learn. In P. Nathan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of education online. New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935291.013.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Elliott, S. N., Frey, J. R., & DiPerna, J. C. (2012). Promoting social skills: Enabling academic and interpersonal successes. In S. E. Brock & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.), Best practices in school crisis prevention and intervention II (pp. 55–78). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  143. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (1991). Social skills intervention guide: Practical strategies for social skills training. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  144. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). SSIS classwide intervention program teacher’s guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  145. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2008). Social skills improvement system intervention guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  146. Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (2017). SSIS social emotional learning edition classwide intervention program. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  147. Elliott, S. N., & Kettler, R. J. (2015). Item and test design considerations for students with special needs. In S. Lane, T. M. Haladyna, & M. Raymond (Eds.), Handbook of test development (2nd ed., pp. 374–391). New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  148. Elliott, S. N., Kettler, R. J., Beddow, P. A., & Kurz, A. (2018). Handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Gilbertson-Schulte, A. (1999). Assessment accommodations checklist/guide. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  150. Elliott, S. N., Kurz, A., & Schulte, A. (2015). Maximizing access to instruction and testing for students with disabilities: What we know and can do to improve achievement. In Smarter balanced assessment consortium spotlight series for teachers supporting students with disabilities. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
  151. Elliott, S. N., Kurz, A., Tindal, G., & Yel, N. (2017). Influence of opportunity to learn indices and education status on students’ mathematics achievement growth. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 145–158.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516663000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., et al. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207.Google Scholar
  153. Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Espinoza, G., Gillen-O’Neel, C., Gonzales, N. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2013). Friend affiliations and school adjustment among Mexican-American adolescents: The moderating role of peer and parent support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(12), 1969–1981.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0023-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 43–48.Google Scholar
  156. Evans, R. (2017). Emotional pedagogy and the gendering of social and emotional learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational psychology, 30(1), 53–74.Google Scholar
  158. Fantuzzo, J., Coolahan, K., Mendez, J., McDermott, P., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1998). Contextually-relevant validation of peer play constructs with African American head start children: Penn interactive peer play scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Fantuzzo, J., Sekino, Y., & Cohen, H. L. (2004). An examination of the contribution of interactive peer play to salient classroom competences for urban Head Start children. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., et al. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
  161. Feldman, E., Kim, J., & Elliott, S. N. (2011). The effects of accommodations on adolescents’ self-efficacy and test performance. Journal of Special Education, 45(2), 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909353791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.Google Scholar
  165. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  166. Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  167. Fitzpatrick, C., & Pagani, L. S. (2013). Task-oriented behavior pays off in later childhood. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 34(2), 94–101.Google Scholar
  168. Foley, R. M., & Pang, L. (2006). Alternative education programs: Program and student characteristics. High School Journal, 89(3), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  171. Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 327–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  174. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder.Google Scholar
  175. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of the oppressed (20th Anniversary edition). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  176. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Frey, J. R., & Elliott, S. N. (2011, April). Social skills intervention planning for young children: An investigation of parent and teacher social behavior importance ratings. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  178. Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2007). Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping strategies in mathematics: The roles of perceived parent and teacher goal emphases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 434–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2010). Changes in efficacy beliefs in mathematics across the transition to middle school: Examining the effects of perceived teacher and parent goal emphases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 102–114.Google Scholar
  180. Gage, N. A., Lierheimer, K. S., & Goran, L. G. (2012). Characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities broadly defined. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311425385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Gamoran, A., Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., & White, P. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J. P., et al. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics in elementary school: A longitudinal investigation of their association. Child Development, 87(1), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Garrett, J. L., & Eccles, I. S. (2009). Linking late-adolescent lifestyles to family and work status in the mid-twenties. In I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity (pp. 243–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  184. Gillies, R. M., & Baffour, B. (2017). The effects of teacher-introduced multimodal representations and discourse on students’ task engagement and scientific language during cooperative, inquiry-based science. Instructional Science, 45(4), 493–513.Google Scholar
  185. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Literacy and the pedagogy of voice and political empowerment. Educational Theory, 38(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
  186. Gonida, E. N., Voulala, K., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2009). Students’ achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Co-examining the role of perceived school goal structures and parent goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  187. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Government of South Australia’s Department for Education and Child Care. (2016). Suspension and exclusion: Information for parents and caregivers. Viewed on 29 August 2017, from https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/parent-information-suspension-exclusion.pdf?v=1459299567
  189. Granite, E., & Graham, L. J. (2012). Remove, rehabilitate, return? The use and effectiveness of behaviour schools in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal on School Disaffection, 9(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  190. Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics, and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 269–279.Google Scholar
  191. Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (1993). Promoting social and emotional development in deaf children: The PATHS Project. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  192. Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 117–136.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30.Google Scholar
  194. Gresham, F. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 139–176.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1170253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Gresham, F. M. (1997). Social competence and students with behavior disorders: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we should go. Education & Treatment of Children, 20(3), 233–249.Google Scholar
  196. Gresham, F. M. (1998). Social skills training: Should we raze, remodel, or rebuild? Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
  197. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Teaching social skills to high-risk children and youth: Preventive and remedial approaches. In M. Shinn, H. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 403–432). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  198. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Assessment and classification of children’s social skills: A review of methods and issues. School Psychology Review, 13(3), 292–301.Google Scholar
  199. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  200. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system—rating scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  201. Gresham, F. M., Van, M., & Cook, C. R. (2006). Social skills training for teaching replacement behaviors: Remediation of acquisition deficits for at-risk children. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 32–46.Google Scholar
  202. Guo, G., & Harris, K. M. (2000). The mechanisms mediating the effects of poverty on children’s intellectual development. Demography, 37(4), 431–447.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2000.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Guo, Y., Sun, S., Breit-Smith, A., Morrison, F. J., & Connor, C. M. (2015). Behavioral engagement and reading achievement in elementary-school-age children: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 332–347.Google Scholar
  204. Gutherson, P., Davies, H., & Daszkiewicz, T. (2011). Achieving successful outcomes through alternative education provision: An international literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2011/r-achieving-successful-outcomes-through-alternative-education-provision-full-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
  205. Guthrie, J. T., Coddington, C. S., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Profiles of reading motivation among African American and Caucasian students. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 317–353.Google Scholar
  206. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007a). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly., 48(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007b). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  210. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.Google Scholar
  212. Haberman, M. (1991). Pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.Google Scholar
  213. Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2015). Perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation toward mathematics activities in educational and out-of-school contexts is related to mathematics homework behavior and attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178.Google Scholar
  215. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575.Google Scholar
  216. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Hardy, I. (2015). Education as a ‘risky business’: Theorising student and teacher learning in complex times. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Hedges, H., Cullen, J., & Jordan, B. (2011). Early years curriculum: Funds of knowledge as a conceptual framework for children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 185–205.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.511275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Henman, P. (2002). The poverty of welfare reform discourse. In T. Eardley & B. Bradbury (Eds.), Competing visions: Refereed proceedings of the National Social Policy Conference 2001, SPRC report 1/02, social policy research centre (pp. 180–191). Sydney: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  221. Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C., & Abedi, J. (2000). Assessing students’ opportunity to learn: Teacher and student perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(4), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(3), 267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Hersh, R., & Walker, H. M. (1983). Great expectations: Making schools effective for all students. Policy Studies Review, 2, 47–188.Google Scholar
  224. Hickey, D. T., & Granade, J. B. (2004). The influence of sociocultural theory on our theories of engagement and motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories re-visited: Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 223–247). Greenwich, CO: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  225. Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application (pp. 77–109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  226. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  227. Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. (2008). 20 U.S.C. § 1001.Google Scholar
  228. Hill, M. S., & Sandfort, J. R. (1995). Effects of childhood poverty on productivity later in life: Implications for public policy. Children and Youth Services Review, 17(1), 91–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-7409(95)00005-W.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: Free Press.Google Scholar
  230. Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Hollenbeck, K. (2002). Determining when test alterations are valid accommodations or modifications for large-scale assessment. In G. Tindal & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Large scale assessment programs for all students (pp. 109–148). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  232. Holliday, M. R., Cimetta, A., Cutshaw, C. A., Yaden, D., & Marx, R. W. (2014). Protective factors for school readiness among children in poverty. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19(3-4), 125–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.971692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Homeschooling Downunder. (2016). Homeschooling statistics. Retrieved from https://www.homeschoolingdownunder.com/homeschooling-australia/homeschooling-statistics/
  234. Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and indirect longitudinal effects of parental involvement on student achievement: Second-order latent growth modeling across ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Horgan, G. (2009). That child is smart because he’s rich: The impact of poverty on young children’s experiences of school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 359–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802707779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Horner, R. H., & Billingsley, F. F. (1988). The effects of competing behavior on the generalization and maintenance of adaptive behavior in applied settings. In R. H. Horner, G. Dunlap, & R. L. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 197–220). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  237. Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Huston, A. C., & Ripke, M. N. (2006). Low-income children’s activity participation as a predictor of psychosocial and academic outcomes in middle childhood and adolescence. In A. Huston, A. Ripke, & N. Marika (Eds.), Developmental contexts in middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood (pp. 260–282). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  239. Hylands, P. (2010). Gateway learning and employment network: The cost of exclusion. National Economic Review, 65, 23–38.Google Scholar
  240. International Labour Organisation. (2015). Global employment trends for youth 2015: Global youth unemployment 1995−2015. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/multimedia/maps-and-charts/WCMS_411196/lang--en/index.htm
  241. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015). Youth employment crisis easing but far from over. http://www.ilo.org/rome/risorse-informative/comunicati-stampa/WCMS_412014/lang--en/index.htm
  242. Irvin, M. J., Meece, J. L., Byun, S., Farmer, T. W., & Hutchins, B. C. (2011). Relationship of school context to rural youth’s educational achievement and aspirations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(9), 1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.Google Scholar
  245. Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohatala, J., & Darvasi, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Jensen, E. (2013). How poverty affects classroom engagement. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 24–30.Google Scholar
  247. Jolivette, K., Stichter, J. P., Nelson, C. M., Scott, T. M., & Liaupsin, C. J. (2000). Improving post-school outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. ERIC/OSEP Digest E597. ERIC Document ED447616. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED447616
  248. Kamler, B., & Comber, B. (2005). Turn-around pedagogies: Improving the education of at-risk students. Improving Schools, 8(2), 121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480205057702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. Keller, T. E., Cusick, G. R., & Courtney, M. E. (2007). Approaching the transition to adulthood: Distinctive profiles of adolescents aging out of the child welfare system. Social Service Review, 81(3), 453–484.Google Scholar
  250. Kelly, D. R. (2016). Multicultural perspectives on race, ethnicity, and identity. Social Work, 61(3), 280–281.Google Scholar
  251. Kendall, L., & Taylor, E. (2016). We can’t make him fit into the system: Parental reflections on the reasons why home education is the only option for their child who has special educational needs. Education, 44(3), 297–310.Google Scholar
  252. Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 60(2), 34–46.Google Scholar
  253. Kerr, M. M., & Zigmond, N. (1986). What do high school teachers want? A study of expectations and standards. Education & Treatment of Children, 9, 239–249.Google Scholar
  254. Kettler, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2010). Assessment accommodations for children with special needs. In E. Baker, P. Peterson, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Limited.Google Scholar
  255. Kettler, R. J., Elliott, S. N., Beddow, P. A., & Kurz, A. (2018). Accessible instruction and testing today. In S. N. Elliott, R. J. Kettler, P. A. Beddow, & A. Kurz (Eds.), The handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  256. Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: What really matters? British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Kidd, T., & Kaczmarek, E. (2010). The experiences of mothers home educating their children with autism spectrum disorder. Issues in Educational Research, 20(3), 257–275.Google Scholar
  258. Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Kieselbach, T. (2013). Executive summary. In T. Kieselbach, K. van Heeringen, M. La Rosa, L. Lemkow, K. Sokou, & B. Starrin (Eds.), Living on the edge: An empirical analysis on long-term youth unemployment and social exclusion in Europe (Vol. 11, pp. 16–24). Opladen: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  260. Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01060.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Kindermann, T. A., McCollam, T. L., & Gibson, E. (1996). Peer group influences on children’s developing school motivation. In K. Wentzel & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 279–312). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  262. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Klauda, S. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. Kolić-Vehovec, S., Rončević, B., & Bajšanski, I. (2008). Motivational components of self-regulated learning and reading strategy use in university students: The role of goal orientation patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 108–113.Google Scholar
  266. Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational–psychological perspective. In L. Smith, C. Rogers, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Development and motivation: Joint perspectives, British journal of educational psychology monograph series, 2 (series II) (pp. 57–84). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  267. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. Kuperminc, G. P., Blatt, S. J., & Leadbeater, B. J. (1997a). Relatedness, self-definition, and early adolescent adjustment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 301–320.Google Scholar
  269. Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., Emmons, C., & Blatt, S. J. (1997b). Perceived school climate and difficulties in the social adjustment of middle school students. Applied Developmental Science, 1(2), 76–88.Google Scholar
  270. Kurz, A. (2011). Access to what should be taught and will be tested: Students’ opportunity to learn the intended curriculum. In S. N. Elliott, R. J. Kettler, P. A. Beddow, & A. Kurz (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 99–129). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  271. Kurz, A. (2018). Confronting the known unknown: How the concept of opportunity to learn can advance tier 1 instruction. In S. N. Elliott, R. J. Kettler, P. A. Beddow, & A. Kurz (Eds.), The handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  272. Kurz, A., & Elliott, S. N. (2011). Overcoming barriers to access for students with disabilities: Testing accommodations and beyond. In M. Russell (Ed.), Assessing students in the margins: Challenges, strategies, and techniques. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  273. Kurz, A., Elliott, S. N., Lemons, C. J., Zigmond, N., Kloo, A., & Kettler, R. J. (2014). Assessing opportunity-to-learn for students with and without disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(1), 24–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508414522685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. Kurz, A., Elliott, S. N., & Schulte, A. (2015). Opportunity to learn for all students: Enhancing access to what should be taught and will be tested. In Smarter balanced assessment series for teachers supporting students with disabilities. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
  275. Kusché, C. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (1994). The PATHS curriculum. Seattle, WA: Developmental Research and Programs.Google Scholar
  276. Labella, M. H., Narayan, A. J., McCormick, C. M., Desjardins, C. D., & Masten, A. S. (2017). Risk and adversity, parenting quality, and children’s social-emotional adjustment in families experiencing homelessness. Child Development, Jul 19. doi:10.1111/cdev.12894Google Scholar
  277. Labyer, S. L. (2004). Exploring the differences between traditional and alternative schools for educationally disengaged students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  278. Lamas, N. (2012). Beyond earn or learn: Young people tell how policy can better support those who need it most. Melbourne: Australian Youth Affairs Coalition.Google Scholar
  279. Lane, K. L., Givner, C. C., & Pierson, M. R. (2004a). Teacher expectations of student behavior: Social skills necessary for success in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. Lane, K. L., Pierson, M., & Givner, C. C. (2004b). Secondary teachers’ views on social competence: Skills essential for success. Journal of Special Education, 38, 174–186.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380030401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. Lane, K. L., Pierson, M. R., & Givner, C. C. (2003). Teacher expectations of student behavior: Which skills do elementary and secondary teachers deem necessary for success in the classroom? Education & Treatment of Children, 26, 413–430.Google Scholar
  282. Lane, K. L., Stanton-Chapman, T., Jamison, K. R., & Phillips, A. (2007). Teacher and parent expectations of preschoolers’ behavior: Social skills necessary for success. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 86–97.  https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214070270020401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  284. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  285. Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479.Google Scholar
  286. LeCompte, M. (1993). Frameworks for hearing silence: What does telling stories mean when we are supposed to be doing science. In D. McLaughlin & W. Tierney (Eds.), Naming silenced lives (pp. 9–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  287. Lee, W., Lee, M. J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.Google Scholar
  289. León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  290. Lepper, M. R., Henderlong Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  292. Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  293. Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512.Google Scholar
  294. Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Savage, G. (2014). Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: The effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 710–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  295. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  296. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137.Google Scholar
  297. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
  298. López, R., & Valdés, A. (2000). Fighting rural poverty in Latin America: New evidence of the effects of education, demographics, and access to land. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(1), 197–211.Google Scholar
  299. Losel, F., & Beelmann, A. (2003). Effects of child skills training in preventing antisocial behavior: A systematic review of randomized evaluations. The Annals of the AAPSS, 857, 177–186.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  300. Luby, J., Belden, A., Botteron, K., Marrus, N., Harms, M. P., Babb, C., et al. (2013). The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: The mediating effect of caregiving and stressful life events. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(12), 1135–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  301. Lucariello, J. M., Nastasi, B. K., Anderman, E. M., Dwyer, C., Ormiston, H., & Skiba, R. (2016). Science supports education: The behavioral research base for psychology’s top 20 principles for enhancing teaching and learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
  302. Luke, A. (2012). After the testing: Talking and reading and writing the world. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  303. Luo, W., Paris, S. G., Hogan, D., & Luo, Z. (2011b). Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
  304. Luo, Y. L., Kovas, Y., Haworth, C., & Plomin, R. (2011a). The etiology of mathematical self-evaluation and mathematics achievement: Understanding the relationship using a cross-lagged twin study from ages 9 to 12. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 710–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  305. Ma, X. (1997). Reciprocal relationships between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  306. Ma, X., & Xu, J. (2004). The causal ordering of mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: A longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 27(2), 165–180.Google Scholar
  307. Maag, J. W. (2005). Social skills training for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities: Problems, conclusions, and suggestions. Exceptionality, 13, 155–172.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1303_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  308. Maag, J. W. (2006). Social skills training for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of reviews. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 155–172.Google Scholar
  309. MacRuairc, G. (2011). They’re my words–I’ll talk how I like! Examining social class and linguistic practice among primary-school children. Language and Education, 25(6), 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  310. Mageau, G. A., Bureau, J. S., Ranger, F., Allen, M. P., & Soenens, B. (2016). The role of parental achievement goals in predicting autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(5), 1702–1711.Google Scholar
  311. Malecki, C. K., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.1.1.19902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  312. Marion, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Nurmi, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Maternal affection moderates friend influence on schoolwork engagement. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 766–771.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  313. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445–480.Google Scholar
  314. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  315. Martens, B. K., Lochner, D. G., & Kelly, S. Q. (1992). The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of the matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 143–151.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  316. Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 413–440.Google Scholar
  317. Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 239–269.Google Scholar
  318. Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  319. Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of math engagement in the middle school years. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199–244.Google Scholar
  320. Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  321. Masten, A. S., Herbers, J. E., Desjardins, C. D., Cutuli, J., McCormick, C. M., Sapienza, J. K., et al. (2012). Executive function skills and school success in young children experiencing homelessness. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  322. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  323. McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 471–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  324. McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2012). Alternative education sites and marginalised young people: I wish there were more schools like this one. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(8), 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  325. McIntosh, D. (2016). Mainstream mindset fails remote aboriginal students. Eureka Street, 26(23), 46.Google Scholar
  326. McKeown, A. (2011). Young people speak: Experiences of alternative education. Developing practice: The child. Youth and Family Work Journal, 29, 68–75.Google Scholar
  327. McMaster, C. (2015). Where is _? Culture and the process of change in the development of inclusive schools. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 11(1), 16–34.Google Scholar
  328. McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  329. McWilliam, R. A., & Casey, A. M. (2008). Engagement of every child in the preschool classroom. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  330. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503.Google Scholar
  331. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514–523.Google Scholar
  332. Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  333. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  334. Meier, C. R., DiPerna, J. C., & Oster, M. M. (2006). Importance of social skills in the elementary grades. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 409–419.Google Scholar
  335. Mendez, J. L., & Fogle, L. M. (2002). Parental reports of preschool children’s social behavior: Relations among peer play, language competence, and problem behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(4), 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  336. Mendez, L. M. R., Knoff, H. M., & Ferron, J. M. (2002). School demographic variables and out-of-school suspension rates: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a large, ethnically diverse school district. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 259–277.Google Scholar
  337. Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C., & Spencer, C. A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. The Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  338. Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  339. Middleton, M. J., Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (2004). The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 7(3), 289–311.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  340. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: What, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.Google Scholar
  341. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  342. Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2011). Re-asserting the place of context in explaining student (under-) achievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 239–256.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  343. Mills, M., Keddie, A., Renshaw, P., & Monk, S. (2017). The politics of differentiation in schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  344. Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2010). Re-engaging students in education: Success factors in alternative schools. WestEnd, QLD: Youth Affairs Network of Queensland (QUANQ).Google Scholar
  345. Mills, M., McGregor, G., Baroutsis, A., Te Riele, K., & Hayes, D. (2016). Alternative education and social justice: Considering issues of affective and contributive justice. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 100–115.Google Scholar
  346. Mitchell, D. (2015). Inclusive education is a multi-faceted concept. CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
  347. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  348. Mitra, D. L. (2006). Student voice from the inside and outside: The positioning of challengers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  349. Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  350. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.Google Scholar
  351. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  352. Morrissette, P. J. (2011). Exploring student experiences within the alternative high school context. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 169–188.Google Scholar
  353. Muir, T. (2008). Principles of practice and teacher actions: Influences on effective teaching of numeracy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 78–101.Google Scholar
  354. Munns, G. (2007). A sense of wonder: Pedagogies to engage students who live in poverty.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 301–315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701237571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  355. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84, 1475–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  356. Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and individual differences, 32(2), 337–348.Google Scholar
  357. Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404.Google Scholar
  358. Murray, S., Mitchell, J., Gale, T., Edwards, J., & Zyngier, D. (2004). Student disengagement from primary schooling: A review of research and practice. A report to the CASS Foundation. Monash University, Melbourne. http://www.cassfoundation.org/2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/StudentDisengagement.pdf
  359. Nagy, G., Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students’ Mathematics self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 482–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  360. National Center for Children in Poverty. (2011). Racial gaps in early childhood: Socio-emotional health, developmental, and educational outcomes among African American boys. Retrieved from http://www.nccp.org/publications/pdf/text_1014.pdf
  361. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016, May). Children and youth with disabilities. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp
  362. Nes Ferrara, S. (2007). Reading fluency and self-efficacy: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52(3), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  363. Newcomb, A., Bukowski, W., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  364. Ng, C. (2005). Academic self-schemas and their self-congruent learning patterns: Findings verified with culturally different samples. Social Psychology of Education, 8(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  365. Ng, C. (2008). Multiple goals learners and their differential patterns of learning. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
  366. Ng, C. (2014). Examining the self-congruent engagement hypothesis: The link between academic self-schemas, motivation, learning and achievement within an academic year. Educational Psychology, 34(6), 730–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  367. Ng, C. (2016). High school students’ motivation to learn mathematics: The role of multiple goals. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 357–375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9780-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  368. Ng, C., & Bartlett, B. (2013). Case studies of disadvantaged students’ reading motivation: Avoiding a deficit perspective. In P. Jalinek (Ed.), Education in Australia: Cultural influences, global perspectives and social challenges (pp. 179–106). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publisher.Google Scholar
  369. Ng, C., Bartlett, B. J., Chester, I., & Kersland, S. (2013). Improving reading performance for economically-disadvantaged students: Combining strategy instruction and motivational support. Reading Psychology, 34(3), 257–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  370. Ng, C., & Graham, S. (2017). Engaging readers in the twenty-first century: What we know and need to know more. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading and reading engagement in the 21st century (pp. 17–46). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  371. Ng, C., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Bartlett, B. (2016). Disadvantaged students’ voices on national testing: The submersion of NAPLAN’s formative potential. In R. Lingard, G. Thomson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  372. Nie, Y., Lau, S., & Liau, A. K. (2011). Role of academic self-efficacy in moderating the relation between task importance and test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 736–741.Google Scholar
  373. Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908–937.Google Scholar
  374. Noble, G. (2017). Asian fails’ and the problem of bad Korean boys: Multiculturalism and the construction of an educational problem. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 2456–2471.Google Scholar
  375. Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Brito, N. H., Bartsch, H., Kan, E., Kuperman, J. M., et al. (2015). Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nature Neuroscience, 18(5), 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  376. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269–287.Google Scholar
  377. Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2), 219–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  378. Noyes, A., Wake, G., & Drake, P. (2011). Widening and increasing post-16 mathematics participation: Pathways, pedagogies and politics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  379. Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  380. Ogbu, J. U., & Simons, H. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29(2), 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  381. Oldfather, P. (1995). Introduction to “learning from student voices”. Theory into Practice, 43, 84–87.Google Scholar
  382. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  383. Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.Google Scholar
  384. Ozer, E. J. (2005). The impact of violence on urban adolescents: Longitudinal effects of perceived school connection and family support. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(2), 167–192.Google Scholar
  385. Pajares, F. (1996a). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.Google Scholar
  386. Pajares, F. (1996b). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325−344.Google Scholar
  387. Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124−139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  388. Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 426−443.Google Scholar
  389. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  390. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives of individual differences (pp. 239–266). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  391. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Google Scholar
  392. Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom. Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 385–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9502-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  393. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  394. Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  395. Parsons, S., & Lewis, A. (2010). The home-education of children with special needs or disabilities in the UK: Views of parents from an online survey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(1), 67–86.Google Scholar
  396. Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 99, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  397. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  398. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  399. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.Google Scholar
  400. Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development., 88, 1653–1670.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev12704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  401. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  402. Phan, H. P. (2012). The development of English and mathematics self-efficacy: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  403. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., Morrison, F., & The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2007). Teaching: Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315, 1795–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  404. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
  405. Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of wellbeing and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–51.Google Scholar
  406. Pinquart, M., Juang, L. P., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2003). Self-efficacy and successful school-to-work transition: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 329–346.Google Scholar
  407. Pintrich, E. A., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  408. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  409. Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4-5), 319–337.Google Scholar
  410. PISA. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn - students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Volume III). PISA.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en.
  411. Plows, V., Bottrell, D., & Te Riele, K. (2017). Valued outcomes in the counter-spaces of alternative education programs: Success but on whose scale? Geographical Research, 55(1), 29–37.Google Scholar
  412. Ponitz, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Grimm, K. J., & Curby, T. W. (2009). Kindergarten classroom quality, behavioral engagement, and reading achievement. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 102–120.Google Scholar
  413. Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  414. Porowski, A., O’Conner, R., & Luo, J. L. (2014a). How do states define alternative education? (REL 2014–038). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved 6 June 2017, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
  415. Porowski, A., O’Conner, R., & Passa, A. (2014b). Disproportionality in school discipline: An assessment of trends in Maryland, 2009-12. REL 2014-017. Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=365
  416. Porter, A. C. (1995). The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 21–27.Google Scholar
  417. Porter, A. C. (2006). Curriculum assessment. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 141–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  418. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., et al. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  419. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  420. Price, H. E. (2015). Principals’ social interactions with teachers: How principal-teacher social relations correlate with teachers’ perceptions of student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 116–139.Google Scholar
  421. Putwain, D. W., & Daniels, R. A. (2010). Is the relationship between competence beliefs and test anxiety influenced by goal orientation? Learning and Individual Differences, 20(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
  422. Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 447–467.Google Scholar
  423. Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2014). Freedom to grow: Children’s perspectives of student voice. Childhood Education, 90(3), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  424. Ranson, S. (2000). Recognizing the pedagogy of voice in a learning community. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  425. Rashid, F. L., Morris, R. D., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  426. Redford, J., Battle, D., & Bielick, S. (2016). Homeschooling in the United States: 2012. NCES 2016-096. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016096rev
  427. Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  428. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  429. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.Google Scholar
  430. Régner, I., Loose, F., & Dumas, F. (2009). Students’ perceptions of parental and teacher academic involvement: Consequences on achievement goals. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(2), 263–277.Google Scholar
  431. Reinders, H., & Youniss, J. (2006). School-based required community service and civic development in adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 10(1), 2–12.Google Scholar
  432. Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69.Google Scholar
  433. Renshaw, P. (2017). Beyond the middle finger: Affective labour, an ethic of care and the reform of teacher education. Teaching Education, 28(1), 88–93.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2016.1264383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  434. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  435. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept–testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  436. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170.Google Scholar
  437. Ripski, M. B., & Gregory, A. (2009). Unfair, unsafe, and unwelcome: Do high school students’ perceptions of unfairness, hostility, and victimization in school predict engagement and achievement? Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 355–375.Google Scholar
  438. Robinson, J., & Smyth, J. (2016). Sent out and stepping back in: Stories from young people placed at risk. Ethnography and Education, 11(2), 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  439. Robinson, M. O. (2016). An investigation of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement as predictors of the intent to drop out of school for eleventh-and twelfth-grade students (Doctoral dissertation). Regent University, Virginia.Google Scholar
  440. Rodriguez, M. C. (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  441. Roegman, R. (2017). The promise of Payne: How overlapping contexts support one superintendent’s adherence to Ruby Payne’s framework for understanding poverty. Journal of Poverty, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2017.1348428.
  442. Roeser, R., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perception of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 408–422.Google Scholar
  443. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activities on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided appropriation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alverez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  444. Rogoff, B., Baker-Sennett, J., Lacasa, P., & Goldsmith, D. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1995(67), 45–65.Google Scholar
  445. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.Google Scholar
  446. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Available online at http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/
  447. Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  448. Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  449. Rose-Krasnor, L. (2009). Future directions in youth involvement research. Social Development, 18(2), 497–509.Google Scholar
  450. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  451. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  452. Rowan, B., & Correnti, R. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the study of instructional improvement. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  453. Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  454. Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  455. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: Carving a new order of experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  456. Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  457. Russell, M. (2018). Recent advances in the accessibility of digitally delivered educational assessments. In S. N. Elliott, R. J. Kettler, P. A. Beddow, & A. Kurz (Eds.), The handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  458. Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150.Google Scholar
  459. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  460. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  461. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  462. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and methods (pp. 618–655). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  463. Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  464. Sabornie, E. J., Evans, C., & Cullinan, D. (2006). Comparing characteristics of high-incidence disability groups: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270020701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  465. Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235–255.Google Scholar
  466. Savelsberg, H., Pignata, S., & Weckert, P. (2017). Second chance education: Barriers, supports and engagement strategies. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(1), 36–57.Google Scholar
  467. Schaar, S. (2015). Agency, aspirations and decision-making of marginalised young people in social enterprises. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  468. Schaeffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2007). The effect of experimental manipulation of student motivation on the situational representation of text. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 755–772.Google Scholar
  469. Schleicher, A. (2011). The case for 21st century learning. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer, 282/283, 42–43.Google Scholar
  470. Schneider, B. (1992). Didactic methods for enhancing children’s peer relations: A quantitativereview. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 363–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90142-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  471. Schneider, B., & Byrne, B. (1985). Children’s social skills training: A meta analysis. In B. H. Schneider, K. Rubin, & J. Ledingham (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 175–190). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  472. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  473. Schulte, A., Elliott, S. N., & Kurz, A. (2015). Understanding and accelerating achievement growth for students with disabilities. In Smarter balanced assessment consortium spotlight series for teachers supporting students with disabilities. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
  474. Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning-disabled children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  475. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  476. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  477. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  478. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  479. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  480. Shernoff, D. J., Abdi, B., Anderson, B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow in schools revisited: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In M. Furlong, R. Gilman, & S. Heubner (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools (2nd ed., pp. 211–226). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  481. Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., et al. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  482. Shochet, I. M., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 170–179.Google Scholar
  483. Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  484. Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  485. Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  486. Sinclair, R. (2004). Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children & Society, 2, 106–118.Google Scholar
  487. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  488. Sireci, S. G., Scarpati, S. E., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  489. Sivan, E. (1986). Motivation in social constructivist theory. Educational Psychologist, 21(3), 209–233.Google Scholar
  490. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997a). Issues in research on self-concept. In M. Meahr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 51–97). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  491. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997b). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  492. Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  493. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.Google Scholar
  494. Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 145–168). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  495. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.Google Scholar
  496. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  497. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644083232331-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  498. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  499. Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. S. (2016). Can student engagement serve as a motivational resource for academic coping, persistence, and learning during late elementary and early middle school? Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2099–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  500. Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2012). Sculpting a ‘social space’ for re-engaging disengaged ‘disadvantaged’ young people with learning. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 44(3), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  501. Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Fish, T. (2013). Blurring the boundaries: From relational learning towards a critical pedagogy of engagement for disengaged disadvantaged young people. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  502. Solheim, O. J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  503. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 4, 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  504. Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety? Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 747–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  505. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.Google Scholar
  506. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  507. Stephanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., Di Cintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110.Google Scholar
  508. Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2009). Converting mathematics tasks to learning opportunities: An important aspect of knowledge for mathematics teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  509. Swain-Bradway, J., Swoszowski, N. C., Boden, L. J., & Sprague, J. R. (2013). Voices from the field: Stakeholder perspectives on PBIS implementation in alternative educational settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(3), 31–46.Google Scholar
  510. Sweller, J. (2010a). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  511. Sweller, J. (2010b). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  512. Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  513. Tapola, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 291–312.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X205272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  514. Taylor, B., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Tereshchenko, A., et al. (2016). Factors deterring schools from mixed attainment teaching practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(3), 327–345.Google Scholar
  515. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 121–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  516. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
  517. Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  518. te Riele, K. (2007). Educational alternatives for marginalised youth. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 53–68.Google Scholar
  519. te Riele, K. (2011). Raising educational attainment: How young people’s experiences speak back to the compact with young australians. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 93–107.Google Scholar
  520. te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  521. te Riele, K., Wilson, K., Wallace, V., McGinty, S., & Lewthwaite, B. (2017). Outcomes from flexible learning options for disenfranchised youth: What counts? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
  522. Thomas, J., McGinty, S., te Riele, K., & Wilson, K. (2017). Distance travelled: Outcomes and evidence in flexible learning options. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4-5), 1–18.Google Scholar
  523. Thompson, G., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2013). A preliminary analysis of teacher perceptions of the effects of NAPLAN on pedagogy and curriculum. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(3), 299–314.Google Scholar
  524. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA in brief: Highlights from the full Australian report: PISA 2012: How Australia measures up.Google Scholar
  525. Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1984). Opportunity to learn for LD students receiving different levels of special education services. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(1), 55–67.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1510262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  526. Tilak, J. B. G. (2002). Education and poverty. Journal of Human Development, 3(2), 191–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880220147301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  527. Tissot, C. (2013). The role of SENCos as leaders. British Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  528. Torff, B., & Sessions, D. (2006). Issues influencing teachers’ beliefs about use of critical-thinking activities with low-advantage learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(4), 77–91.Google Scholar
  529. Triandafyllidou, A. (2015). European Muslims: Caught between local integration challenges and global terrorism discourses. IAI Working Papers 15. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://diana-n.iue.it:8080/handle/1814/35900
  530. Tsai, Y. M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 460–472.Google Scholar
  531. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 290–305.Google Scholar
  532. Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Trucano, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2014). Enhancing students’ engagement: Report of a 3-year intervention with middle school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1195–1226.Google Scholar
  533. Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2008). How does motivation develop and why does it change? Reframing motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 119–131.Google Scholar
  534. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of education statistics, 2015 (NCES 2016-014).Google Scholar
  535. Ukkola, A., & Korkeamäki, R. L. (2017). Engaging students in the “joy of reading” programme in Finland. In C. Ng & B. Bartlett (Eds.), Improving reading and reading engagement in the 21st Century (pp. 143–165). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  536. UNESCO. (2010). Reaching the marginalized Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001866/186606E.pdf
  537. UNICEF. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retreived from http://www.unicef.org/crc/fulltext.htm.
  538. Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  539. Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist, 18(2), 136–147.Google Scholar
  540. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  541. Utsumi, M. C., & Mendes, C. R. (2000). Researching the attitudes towards mathematics in basic education. Educational Psychology, 2, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  542. Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  543. Valentine, J. C., DeBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 37–41.Google Scholar
  544. van der Linden, J., & Renshaw, P. (2004). Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction and teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  545. van Rooij, E. C., Jansen, E. P., & van de Grift, W. J. (2017). Secondary school students’ engagement profiles and their relationship with academic adjustment and achievement in university. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  546. Van Ryzin, M. J. (2011). Protective factors at school: Reciprocal effects among adolescents’ perceptions of the school environment, engagement in learning, and hope. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1568–1580.Google Scholar
  547. Vannest, K. J., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2010). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  548. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., & Roberts, G. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.Google Scholar
  549. Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216.Google Scholar
  550. Verkuyten, M., & Brug, P. (2003). Educational performance and psychological disengagement among ethnic-minority and Dutch adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164(2), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  551. Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773–790.Google Scholar
  552. Viljaranta, J., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2009a). Cross-lagged relations between task motivation and performance in arithmetic and literacy in kindergarten. Learning and Instruction, 19, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  553. Viljaranta, J., Nurmi, J.-E., Aunola, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2009b). The role of task values in adolescents’ educational tracks: A person-oriented approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(4), 786–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  554. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318.Google Scholar
  555. Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students’ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 635.Google Scholar
  556. Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65(2), 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  557. Walker, H. M., Ramsay, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  558. Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. (2002). Developmental prevention of at-risk outcomes for vulnerable antisocial children and youth. In K. Lane, F. M. Gresham, & T. O’Shaughnessy (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at-risk for emotional and behavioural disorders (pp. 177–194). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  559. Walkington, C. A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2014). Motivating students by “personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. In S. A. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. XVIII. Motivational interventions (pp. 139–176). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  560. Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  561. Wang, M., Hill, N. C., & Hofkens, T. (2014). Parental involvement and African American and European American adolescents’ academic, behavioral, and emotional development in secondary school. Child Development, 85(6), 2151–2168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  562. Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57–65.Google Scholar
  563. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352.Google Scholar
  564. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  565. Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  566. Wang, M. T., & Peck, S. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1266–1276.Google Scholar
  567. Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th-through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  568. Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  569. Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1594–1611.Google Scholar
  570. Webster-Stratton, C. (1984). Randomized trial of two parent-training programs for families with conduct-disordered children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 666–678.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  571. Webster-Stratton, C., & Hancock, L. (1998). Training for parents of young children with conduct problems: Content, methods, and therapeutic processes. In C. E. Schaefer & J. M. Briesmeister (Eds.), Handbook of parent training (pp. 98–152). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  572. Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  573. Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  574. Wentzel, K. R., Russell, S., & Baker, S. (2016). Emotional support and expectations from parents, teachers, and peers predict adolescent competence at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 242–255.Google Scholar
  575. Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2011). Peer relationships and learning: Implications for instruction. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 322–343). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  576. Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1984(23), 7–18.Google Scholar
  577. Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  578. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  579. Whitted, K. S. (2011). Understanding how social and emotional skill deficits contribute to school failure. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(1), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  580. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  581. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  582. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  583. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  584. Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 210–216.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  585. Williams, G. C., Cox, E. M., Hedberg, V. A., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Extrinsic life goals and health risks in adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1756–1771.Google Scholar
  586. Williams, T., & Williams, K. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 453–466.Google Scholar
  587. Wilson, K., Stemp, K., & McGinty, S. (2011). Re-engaging young people with education and training: What are the alternatives? Youth Studies Australia, 30(4), 32–39.Google Scholar
  588. Winsler, A., Kim, Y. K., & Richard, E. R. (2014). Socio-emotional skills, behavior problems, and Spanish competence predict the acquisition of English among English language learners in poverty. Developmental Psychology, 50(9), 2242–2254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  589. Wisehart, R. (2004). Nurturing passionate teachers: Making our work transparent. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(4), 45–53.Google Scholar
  590. Wong, E. H., Wiest, D. J., & Cusick, L. B. (2002). Perceptions of autonomy support, parent attachment, competence and self-worth as predictors of motivational orientation and academic achievement: An examination of sixth-and-ninth-grade regular education students. Adolescence, 37, 255–266.Google Scholar
  591. Yuen, M., Chan, S., Chan, C., Fung, D. C., Cheung, W. M., Kwan, T., et al. (2016). Differentiation in key learning areas for gifted students in regular classes: A project for primary school teachers in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 36–46.Google Scholar
  592. Zablocki, M., & Krezmien, M. P. (2013). Drop-out predictors among students with high-incidence disabilities: A National Longitudinal and Transitional Study 2 analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  593. Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  594. Zipin, L. (2009). Dark funds of knowledge, deep funds of pedagogy: Exploring boundaries between lifeworlds and schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 317–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300903037044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  595. Zolkoski, S. M., Bullock, L. M., & Gable, R. A. (2016). Factors associated with student resilience: Perspectives of graduates of alternative education programs. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(3), 231–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clarence Ng
    • 1
  • Brendan Bartlett
    • 2
  • Stephen N. Elliott
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Learning Sciences & Teacher EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education & ArtsAustralian Catholic UniversityVirginiaAustralia
  3. 3.Sanford School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations