Advertisement

Development of Hydrogels from Edible Polymers

  • Akbar Ali
  • Shakeel Ahmed
Chapter

Abstract

Hydrogels are three dimensional crosslinked macromolecular network structures that can absorb and retain a significant amount of water without dissolving in it. This chapter reflects a detailed account on hydrogel developed from edible polymers and their potential applications highly emphasizing on food industries as packaging material. Hydrogels based on edibles polymers offers many valuable properties compared to their synthetic counterparts. Edibles polymers can contribute to the reduction of environmental contamination; advances recyclability, provides sustainability and there by increases its applicability along with providing environmentally benign products. The application of edible polymer hydrogel covers many areas including drug delivery to tissue engineering in biomedical fields, food industries; providing more safe and attractive products, and pharmaceuticals etc. The main objective of this chapter is to provide a brief idea and description about edible polymers based hydrogels, its synthesis, properties and applications.

Keywords

Biopolymers Cross-linking Food packaging 

References

  1. Abad LV, Relleve LS, Aranilla CT, Dela Rosa AM (2003) Properties of radiation synthesized PVP-kappa carrageenan hydrogel blends. Radiat Phys Chem 68:901–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abd El-Salam MH, El-Shibiny S (2015) Preparation and properties of milk proteins-based encapsulated probiotics: a review. Dairy Sci Technol 95:393–412.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-015-0223-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdorreza MN, Cheng LH, Karim AA (2011) Effects of plasticizers on thermal properties and heat sealability of sago starch films. Food Hydrocoll 25:56–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abreu AS, Oliveira M, de Sá A et al (2015) Antimicrobial nanostructured starch based films for packaging. Carbohydr Polym 129:127–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackar D, Babic J, Jozinovic A et al (2015) Starch modification by organic acids and their derivatives: a review. Molecules 20:19554–19570.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201019554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Akelah A (2013) Polymers in food packaging and protection. In: Functionalized polymeric materials in agriculture and the food industry. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 293–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ali A, Ahmed S (2018) A review on chitosan and its nanocomposites in drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 109:273–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.078CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Alonso-Mougán M, Meijide F, Jover A et al (2002) Rheological behaviour of an amide pectin. J Food Eng 55:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Álvarez K, Famá L, Gutiérrez TJ (2017) Physicochemical, antimicrobial and mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials based on biopolymers with application in the food industry. In: Masuelli M, Renard D (eds) Advances in physicochemical properties of biopolymers: part 1. Bentham Science Publishers, pp 358–400.  https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681084534117010015. ISBN: 978-1-68108-454-1. eISBN: 978-1-68108-453-4
  10. Athawale VD, Lele V (1998) Graft copolymerization onto starch. II. Grafting of acrylic acid and preparation of it’s hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 35:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00138-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Athawale VD, Lele V (2000) Thermal studies on granular maize starch and its graft copolymers with vinyl monomers. Starch Stärke 52:205–213.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379X(200007)52:6/7<205::AID-STAR205>3.0.CO;2-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Athawale VD, Vidyagauri VL (1998) Graft copolymerization onto starch. 3: Grafting of acrylamide using ceric ion initiation and preparation of its hydrogels. Starch Stärke 50:426–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bader HG, Göritz D (1994a) Investigations on high amylose corn starch films. Part 1: wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS). Starch Stärke 46:229–232.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19940460606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bader HG, Göritz D (1994b) Investigations on high amylose corn starch films. Part 3: stress strain behaviour. Starch Stärke 46:435–439.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19940461106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bader HG, Göritz D (1994c) Investigations on high amylose corn starch films. Part 2: water vapor sorption. Starch Stärke 46:249–252.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19940460704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Balakrishnan B, Jayakrishnan A (2005) Self-cross-linking biopolymers as injectable in situ forming biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials 26:3941–3951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bayarri M, Oulahal N, Degraeve P, Gharsallaoui A (2014) Properties of lysozyme/low methoxyl (LM) pectin complexes for antimicrobial edible food packaging. J Food Eng 131:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhat R, Abdullah N, Din RH, Tay G-S (2013) Producing novel sago starch based food packaging films by incorporating lignin isolated from oil palm black liquor waste. J Food Eng 119:707–713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.06.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bierhalz ACK, da Silva MA, Kieckbusch TG (2012) Natamycin release from alginate/pectin films for food packaging applications. J Food Eng 110:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boonlertnirun S, Boonraung C, Suvanasara R (2017) Application of chitosan in rice productionGoogle Scholar
  21. Bordenave N, Grelier S, Pichavant F, Coma V (2007) Water and moisture susceptibility of chitosan and paper-based materials: structure–property relationships. J Agric Food Chem 55:9479–9488.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf070595iCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bourtoom T (2008) Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties. Int Food Res J 15:237–248Google Scholar
  23. Bozanic DK, Djokovic V, Dimitrijevic-Brankovic S et al (2011) Inhibition of microbial growth by silver-starch nanocomposite thin films. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 22:2343–2355.  https://doi.org/10.1163/092050610X539532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bui VKH, Park D, Lee Y-C (2017) Chitosan combined with ZnO, TiO2 and Ag nanoparticles for antimicrobial wound healing applications: a mini review of the research trends. Polymers (Basel) 9:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Butler MF, Ng Y-F, Pudney PDA (2003) Mechanism and kinetics of the crosslinking reaction between biopolymers containing primary amine groups and genipin. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 41:3941–3953.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.10960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cagri A, Ustunol Z, Ryser ET (2001) Antimicrobial, mechanical, and moisture barrier properties of low pH whey protein-based edible films containing p-aminobenzoic or sorbic acids. J Food Sci 66:865–870.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen J, Liu C, Chen Y et al (2008) Structural characterization and properties of starch/konjac glucomannan blend films. Carbohydr Polym 74:946–952.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.05.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chronakis IS, Doublier J-L, Piculell L (2000) Viscoelastic properties for kappa- and iota-carrageenan in aqueous NaI from the liquid-like to the solid-like behaviour. Int J Biol Macromol 28:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(00)00141-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chu H, Wei H, Zhu J, Hu S (2011) Preparation of starch esters with crosslinking structures derived from dianhydride. Front Chem Sci Eng 5:51–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-010-0534-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chung Y-L, Ansari S, Estevez L et al (2010) Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch–clay nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 79:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E (2011) Chitosan—a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 36:981–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Carvalho RA, Grosso CRF (2004) Characterization of gelatin based films modified with transglutaminase, glyoxal and formaldehyde. Food Hydrocoll 18:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. de Moura MR, Mattoso LHC, Zucolotto V (2012) Development of cellulose-based bactericidal nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles and their use as active food packaging. J Food Eng 109:520–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Demitri C, Sole RD, Scalera F et al (2008) Novel superabsorbent cellulose-based hydrogels crosslinked with citric acid. J Appl Polym Sci 110:2453–2460.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Demitri C, De Benedictis VM, Madaghiele M et al (2016) Nanostructured active chitosan-based films for food packaging applications: effect of graphene stacks on mechanical properties. Measurement 90:418–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diab T, Biliaderis CG, Gerasopoulos D, Sfakiotakis E (2001) Physicochemical properties and application of pullulan edible films and coatings in fruit preservation. J Sci Food Agric 81:988–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dimida S, Demitri C, De Benedictis VM et al (2015) Genipin-cross-linked chitosan-based hydrogels: reaction kinetics and structure-related characteristics. J Appl Polym Sci 132:2804–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Djagny KB, Wang Z, Xu S (2001) Gelatin: a valuable protein for food and pharmaceutical industries: review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 41:481–492.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091091904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Dodane V, Vilivalam VD (1998) Pharmaceutical applications of chitosan. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1:246–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Domenek S, Feuilloley P, Gratraud J et al (2004) Biodegradability of wheat gluten based bioplastics. Chemosphere 54:551–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00760-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dragan ES, Apopei DF (2011) Synthesis and swelling behavior of pH-sensitive semi-interpenetrating polymer network composite hydrogels based on native and modified potatoes starch as potential sorbent for cationic dyes. Chem Eng J 178:252–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eldin MSM, El-Sherif HM, Soliman EA et al (2011) Polyacrylamide-grafted carboxymethyl cellulose: smart pH-sensitive hydrogel for protein concentration. J Appl Polym Sci 122:469–479.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellis RP, Cochrane MP, Dale MFB et al (1998) Starch production and industrial use. J Sci Food Agric 77:289–311.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199807)77:3<289::AID-JSFA38>3.0.CO;2-DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. El-Mohdy HLA (2014) Radiation initiated synthesis of 2-acrylamidoglycolic acid grafted carboxymethyl cellulose as pH-sensitive hydrogel. Polym Eng Sci 54:2753–2761.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L et al (2004) Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials 25:5753–5762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Erdohan ZÖ, Turhan KN (2005) Barrier and mechanical properties of methylcellulose–whey protein films. Packag Technol Sci 18:295–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Espitia PJP, Du W-X, de Jesús Avena-Bustillos R et al (2014) Edible films from pectin: physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties—a review. Food Hydrocoll 35:287–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fama L, Rojas AM, Goyanes S, Gerschenson L (2005) Mechanical properties of tapioca-starch edible films containing sorbates. LWT Food Sci Technol 38:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Farhan A, Hani NM (2017) Characterization of edible packaging films based on semi-refined kappa-carrageenan plasticized with glycerol and sorbitol. Food Hydrocoll 64:48–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Farris S, Song J, Huang Q (2009) Alternative reaction mechanism for the cross-linking of gelatin with glutaraldehyde. J Agric Food Chem 58:998–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Farris S, Schaich KM, Liu L et al (2011) Gelatin–pectin composite films from polyion-complex hydrogels. Food Hydrocoll 25:61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Farris S, Introzzi L, Fuentes-Alventosa JM et al (2012) Self-assembled pullulan–silica oxygen barrier hybrid coatings for food packaging applications. J Agric Food Chem 60:782–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fiamingo A, Montembault A, Boitard S-E et al (2016) Chitosan hydrogels for the regeneration of infarcted myocardium: preparation, physicochemical characterization, and biological evaluation. Biomacromolecules 17:1662–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ficko-Blean E, Préchoux A, Thomas F et al (2017) Carrageenan catabolism is encoded by a complex regulon in marine heterotrophic bacteria. Nat Commun 8:1685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. García MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE (2000) Microstructural Characterization of Plasticized Starch-Based Films. Starch Stärke 52:118–124.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379X(200006)52:4<118::AID-STAR118>3.0.CO;2-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. García-González CA, Alnaief M, Smirnova I (2011) Polysaccharide-based aerogels—promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym 86:1425–1438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gennadios A, Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Effect of pH on properties of wheat gluten and soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 41:1835–1839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ghanbarzadeh B, Oromiehi AR (2008) Biodegradable biocomposite films based on whey protein and zein: barrier, mechanical properties and AFM analysis. Int J Biol Macromol 43:209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.05.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H, Entezami AA (2011) Improving the barrier and mechanical properties of corn starch-based edible films: effect of citric acid and carboxymethyl cellulose. Ind Crop Prod 33:229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Glibowski P, Mleko S, Wesolowska-Trojanowska M (2006) Gelation of single heated vs. double heated whey protein isolate. Int Dairy J 16:1113–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gómez-Guillén MC, Giménez B, López-Caballero ME, Montero MP (2011) Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocoll 25:1813–1827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Goudarzi V, Shahabi-Ghahfarrokhi I, Babaei-Ghazvini A (2017) Preparation of ecofriendly UV-protective food packaging material by starch/TiO2 bio-nanocomposite: characterization. Int J Biol Macromol 95:306–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Gregorova A, Saha N, Kitano T, Saha P (2015) Hydrothermal effect and mechanical stress properties of carboxymethylcellulose based hydrogel food packaging. Carbohydr Polym 117:559–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Guilbert S, Gontard N, Cuq B (1995) Technology and applications of edible protective films. Packag Technol Sci 8:339–346.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2770080607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gunasekaran S, Xiao L, Ould Eleya MM (2006) Whey protein concentrate hydrogels as bioactive carriers. J Appl Polym Sci 99:2470–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gupta B, Tummalapalli M, Deopura BL, Alam MS (2014) Preparation and characterization of in-situ crosslinked pectin–gelatin hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 106:312–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Gutiérrez TJ (2017) Chitosan applications for the food industry. In: Ahmed S, Ikram S (eds) Chitosan: derivatives, composites and applications. Wiley-Scrivener Publisher, pp 183–232.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119364849.ch8. ISBN: 978-1-119-36350-7
  68. Gutiérrez TJ (2018a) Characterization and in vitro digestibility of non-conventional starches from guinea arrowroot and La Armuña lentils as potential food sources for special diet regimens. Starch Stärke 70(1–2).  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201700124
  69. Gutiérrez TJ (2018b) Active and intelligent films made from starchy sources/blackberry pulp. J Polym Environ 15:445–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1134-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gutiérrez TJ, Alvarez VA (2017a) Properties of native and oxidized corn starch/polystyrene blends under conditions of reactive extrusion using zinc octanoate as a catalyst. React Funct Polym 112:33–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Gutiérrez TJ, Alvarez VA (2017b) Eco-friendly films prepared from plantain flour/PCL blends under reactive extrusion conditions using zirconium octanoate as a catalyst. Carbohydr Polym 178:260–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Gutiérrez TJ, Alvarez VA (2017c) Data on physicochemical properties of active films derived from plantain flour/PCL blends developed under reactive extrusion conditions. Data Brief 15:445–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Gutiérrez TJ, Alvarez VA (2017d) Cellulosic materials as natural fillers in starch-containing matrix-based films: a review. Polym Bull 74(6):2401–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1814-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gutiérrez TJ, Morales NJ, Tapia MS et al (2015a) Corn starch 80: 20 “waxy”: regular,“native” and phosphated, as bio-matrixes for edible films. Procedia Mater Sci 8:304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.077
  75. Gutiérrez TJ, Morales NJ, Pérez E, Tapia MS, Famá L (2015b) Physico-chemical study of edible films based on native and phosphating cush-cush yam and cassava starches. Food Packaging Shelf Life 3:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Gutiérrez TJ, Tapia MS, Pérez E, Famá L (2015c) Edible films based on native and phosphated 80:20 waxy:normal corn starch. Starch Stärke 67(1–2):90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201400164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Gutiérrez TJ, Tapia MS, Pérez E, Famá L (2015d) Structural and mechanical properties of native and modified cush-cush yam and cassava starch edible films. Food Hydrocoll 45:211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Gutiérrez TJ, González Seligra P, Medina Jaramillo C, Famá L, Goyanes S (2017) Effect of filler properties on the antioxidant response of thermoplastic starch composites. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Kessler MR (eds) Handbook of composites from renewable materials. Wiley-Scrivener Publisher, pp 337–370.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119441632.ch14. ISBN: 978-1-119-22362-7
  79. Hambleton A, Fabra M-J, Debeaufort F et al (2009) Interface and aroma barrier properties of iota-carrageenan emulsion–based films used for encapsulation of active food compounds. J Food Eng 93:80–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ham-Pichavant F, Sèbe G, Pardon P, Coma V (2005) Fat resistance properties of chitosan-based paper packaging for food applications. Carbohydr Polym 61:259–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Heidebach T, Först P, Kulozik U (2009a) Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins. Food Hydrocoll 23:1670–1677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Heidebach T, Först P, Kulozik U (2009b) Transglutaminase-induced caseinate gelation for the microencapsulation of probiotic cells. Int Dairy J 19:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hermansson A-M (1989) Rheological and microstructural evidence for transient states during gelation of kappa-carrageenan in the presence of potassium. Carbohydr Polym 10:163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Hermansson A-M, Eriksson E, Jordansson E (1991) Effects of potassium, sodium and calcium on the microstructure and rheological behaviour of kappa-carrageenan gels. Carbohydr Polym 16:297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Hong J, Zeng X-A, Brennan CS et al (2016) Recent advances in techniques for starch esters and the applications: a review. Foods 5:50.  https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5030050CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Hopkins EJ, Chang C, Lam RSH, Nickerson MT (2015) Effects of flaxseed oil concentration on the performance of a soy protein isolate-based emulsion-type film. Food Res Int 67:418–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hosseini MH, Razavi SH, Mousavi MA (2009) Antimicrobial, physical and mechanical properties of chitosan-based films incorporated with thyme, clove and cinnamon essential oils. J Food Process Preserv 33:727–743.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00307.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Hurtado-Lopez P, Murdan S (2005) Formulation and characterisation of zein microspheres as delivery vehicles. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 15:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Introzzi L, Blomfeldt TOJ, Trabattoni S et al (2012) Ultrasound-assisted pullulan/montmorillonite bionanocomposite coating with high oxygen barrier properties. Langmuir 28:11206–11214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Islam S, Bhuiyan MAR, Islam MN (2017) Chitin and chitosan: structure, properties and applications in biomedical engineering. J Polym Environ 25:854–866.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0865-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ismail H, Irani M, Ahmad Z (2013) Starch-based hydrogels: present status and applications. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 62:411–420.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2012.719141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Jensen A, Lim L-T, Barbut S, Marcone M (2015) Development and characterization of soy protein films incorporated with cellulose fibers using a hot surface casting technique. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:162–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.09.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Jin J, Song M, Hourston DJ (2004) Novel chitosan-based films cross-linked by genipin with improved physical properties. Biomacromolecules 5:162–168.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034286mCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. John MJ, Thomas S (2008) Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 71:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kadam DM, Thunga M, Wang S et al (2013) Preparation and characterization of whey protein isolate films reinforced with porous silica coated titania nanoparticles. J Food Eng 117:133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kamel S, Ali N, Jahangir K et al (2008) Pharmaceutical significance of cellulose: a review. Express Polym Lett 2:758–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Karim AA, Bhat R (2008) Gelatin alternatives for the food industry: recent developments, challenges and prospects. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:644–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kavoosi G, Rahmatollahi A, Mohammad Mahdi Dadfar S, Mohammadi Purfard A (2014) Effects of essential oil on the water binding capacity, physico-mechanical properties, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of gelatin films. LWT Food Sci Technol 57:556–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kayserilioğlu BŞ, Bakir U, Yilmaz L, Akkaş N (2003) Use of xylan, an agricultural by-product, in wheat gluten based biodegradable films: mechanical, solubility and water vapor transfer rate properties. Bioresour Technol 87:239–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00258-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Khalil HPSA, Saurabh CK, Tye YY et al (2017) Seaweed based sustainable films and composites for food and pharmaceutical applications: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kim S-J, Ustunol Z (2001) Thermal properties, heat sealability and seal attributes of whey protein isolate/lipid emulsion edible films. J Food Sci 66:985–990.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb08223.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Klein MP, Hackenhaar CR, Lorenzoni ASG et al (2016) Chitosan crosslinked with genipin as support matrix for application in food process: support characterization and β-d-galactosidase immobilization. Carbohydr Polym 137:184–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Kobašlija M, McQuade DT (2006) Removable colored coatings based on calcium alginate hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 7:2357–2361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Kong HJ, Alsberg E, Kaigler D et al (2004) Controlling degradation of hydrogels via the size of crosslinked junctions. Adv Mater 16:1917–1921.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200400014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Kontogiorgos V (2011) Microstructure of hydrated gluten network. Food Res Int 44:2582–2586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Krochta JM (2002) Proteins as raw materials for films and coatings: definitions, current status, and opportunities. In: Protein-based films and coatings. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  107. Kulkarni CV, Moinuddin Z, Patil-Sen Y et al (2015) Lipid-hydrogel films for sustained drug release. Int J Pharm 479:416–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.01.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Kumar R, Choudhary V, Mishra S et al (2002) Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Ind Crop Prod 16:155–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00007-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kumar P, Sandeep KP, Alavi S et al (2010) Preparation and characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on soy protein isolate and montmorillonite using melt extrusion. J Food Eng 100:480–489.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.04.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kuorwel KK, Cran MJ, Sonneveld K et al (2013) Migration of antimicrobial agents from starch-based films into a food simulant. LWT Food Sci Technol 50:432–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.08.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lacroix M, Le TC, Ouattara B et al (2002) Use of γ-irradiation to produce films from whey, casein and soya proteins: structure and functionals characteristics. Radiat Phys Chem 63:827–832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00574-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Lagaron JM, Fernandez-Saiz P, Ocio MJ (2007) Using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to design active antimicrobial food packaging structures based on high molecular weight chitosan polysaccharide. J Agric Food Chem 55:2554–2562.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf063110jCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Lagrain B, Goderis B, Brijs K, Delcour JA (2010) Molecular basis of processing wheat gluten toward biobased materials. Biomacromolecules 11:533–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Lakemond CMM, de Jongh HHJ, Paques M et al (2003) Gelation of soy glycinin; influence of pH and ionic strength on network structure in relation to protein conformation. Food Hydrocoll 17:365–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(02)00100-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Mülhaupt R (2002) Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23:4437–4447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Langendorff V, Cuvelier G, Michon C et al (2000) Effects of carrageenan type on the behaviour of carrageenan/milk mixtures. Food Hydrocoll 14:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Langmaier F, Mokrejs P, Kolomaznik K, Mladek M (2008) Biodegradable packing materials from hydrolysates of collagen waste proteins. Waste Manag 28:549–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Lawton JW (2002) Zein: a history of processing and use. Cereal Chem 79:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Li B, Kennedy JF, Jiang QG, Xie BJ (2006) Quick dissolvable, edible and heatsealable blend films based on konjac glucomannan—gelatin. Food Res Int 39:544–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Li L, Fang Y, Vreeker R et al (2007) Reexamining the egg-box model in calcium-alginate gels with X-ray diffraction. Biomacromolecules 8:464–468.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060550aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Li J-H, Miao J, Wu J-L et al (2014) Preparation and characterization of active gelatin-based films incorporated with natural antioxidants. Food Hydrocoll 37:166–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Liu LS, Kost J, Yan F, Spiro RC (2012) Hydrogels from biopolymer hybrid for biomedical, food, and functional food applications. Polymers (Basel) 4:997–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Liu J, Su D, Yao J et al (2017) Soy protein-based polyethylenimine hydrogel and its high selectivity for copper ion removal in wastewater treatment. J Mater Chem A 5:4163–4171.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA10814HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. LiuLiu LC-K, Fishman ML, Hicks KB (2007) Composite films from pectin and fish skin gelatin or soybean flour protein. J Agric Food Chem 55:2349–2355.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062612uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Livney YD (2010) Milk proteins as vehicles for bioactives. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 15:73–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. López de Dicastillo C, Bustos F, Guarda A, Galotto MJ (2016) Cross-linked methyl cellulose films with murta fruit extract for antioxidant and antimicrobial active food packaging. Food Hydrocoll 60:335–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.03.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Lourdin D, Della VG, Colonna P (1995) Influence of amylose content on starch films and foams. Carbohydr Polym 27:261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(95)00071-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Lu DR, Xiao CM, Xu SJ (2009) Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polym Lett 3:366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Luo Y, Wang Q (2014) Zein-based micro-and nano-particles for drug and nutrient delivery: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 131:40696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Mahalik NP, Nambiar AN (2010) Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:117–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Majdzadeh-Ardakani K, Navarchian AH, Sadeghi F (2010) Optimization of mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch/clay nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 79:547–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Majee SB, Avlani D, Biswas GR (2017) Pharmacological, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and diagnostic applications of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae and bacteria. African J Pharm Pharmacol 11:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Maltais A, Remondetto GE, Gonzalez R, Subirade M (2005) Formation of soy protein isolate cold-set gels: protein and salt effects. J Food Sci 70:C67–C73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09023.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Mangione MR, Giacomazza D, Bulone D et al (2005) K(+) and Na(+) effects on the gelation properties of kappa-Carrageenan. Biophys Chem 113:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2004.08.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Mao JS, Yin YJ, De Yao K (2003) The properties of chitosan–gelatin membranes and scaffolds modified with hyaluronic acid by different methods. Biomaterials 24:1621–1629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Märtson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T et al (1999) Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials 20:1989–1995.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00094-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Matignon A, Tecante A (2017) Starch retrogradation: from starch components to cereal products. Food Hydrocoll 68:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Mi F, Sung H, Shyu S (2000) Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan-based network prepared using naturally occurring crosslinker. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 38:2804–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Mi F-L, Tan Y-C, Liang H-C et al (2001) In vitro evaluation of a chitosan membrane cross-linked with genipin. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 12:835–850.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856201753113051CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Mi F-L, Shyu S-S, Peng C-K (2005) Characterization of ring-opening polymerization of genipin and pH-dependent cross-linking reactions between chitosan and genipin. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 43:1985–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.20669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Miles MJ, Morris VJ, Orford PD, Ring SG (1985) The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch. Carbohydr Res 135:271–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(00)90778-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Miller KS, Krochta JM (1997) Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 8:228–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01051-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Mishra RK, Banthia AK, Majeed ABA (2012) Pectin based formulations for biomedical applications: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 5:1–7Google Scholar
  144. Mohammadian M, Madadlou A (2016) Cold-set hydrogels made of whey protein nanofibrils with different divalent cations. Int J Biol Macromol 89:499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Mørch ÝA, Donati I, Strand BL, Skjåk-Braek G (2006) Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromolecules 7:1471–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060010dCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Mørch YA, Qi M, Gundersen POM et al (2012) Binding and leakage of barium in alginate microbeads. J Biomed Mater Res A 100:2939–2947.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. Morris VJ (1990) Starch gelation and retrogradation. Trends Food Sci Technol 1:2–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(90)90002-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Mu C, Guo J, Li X et al (2012) Preparation and properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked gelatin edible films. Food Hydrocoll 27:22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Muppalla SR, Kanatt SR, Chawla SP, Sharma A (2014) Carboxymethyl cellulose–polyvinyl alcohol films with clove oil for active packaging of ground chicken meat. Food Packaging Shelf Life 2:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Muyonga JH, Cole CGB, Duodu KG (2004) Extraction and physico-chemical characterisation of Nile perch (Lates niloticus) skin and bone gelatin. Food Hydrocoll 18:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Muzzarelli RAA (2009) Genipin-crosslinked chitosan hydrogels as biomedical and pharmaceutical aids. Carbohydr Polym 77:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Narayanan RP, Melman G, Letourneau NJ et al (2012) Photodegradable Iron(III) cross-linked alginate gels. Biomacromolecules 13:2465–2471.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm300707aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Nguyen KT, West JL (2002) Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:4307–4314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. Ni N, Dumont M-J (2017) Protein-based hydrogels derived from industrial byproducts containing collagen, keratin, zein and soy. Waste Biomass Valori 8:285–300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9684-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Ni N, Duquette D, Dumont M-J (2017) Synthesis and characterization of zein-based cryogels and their potential as diesel fuel absorbent. Eur Polym J 91:420–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.04.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Ni N, Zhang D, Dumont M-J (2018) Synthesis and characterization of zein-based superabsorbent hydrogels and their potential as heavy metal ion chelators. Polym Bull 75:31–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2017-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Nur Hanani ZA, Roos YH, Kerry JP (2014) Use and application of gelatin as potential biodegradable packaging materials for food products. Int J Biol Macromol 71:94–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Oladoja NA, Unuabonah EI, Amuda OS, Kolawole OM (2017) Progress and prospects of polysaccharide composites as adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment. In: Polysaccharides as a green and sustainable resources for water and wastewater treatment. Springer, pp 65–90Google Scholar
  159. Ou S, Wang Y, Tang S et al (2005) Role of ferulic acid in preparing edible films from soy protein isolate. J Food Eng 70:205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.09.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Oun AA, Rhim J-W (2017) Carrageenan-based hydrogels and films: effect of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles on the physical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll 67:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.12.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Padhi JR, Nayak D, Nanda A et al (2016) Development of highly biocompatible Gelatin & i-Carrageenan based composite hydrogels: in depth physiochemical analysis for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 153:292–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Pal K, Banthia AK, Majumdar DK (2006) Development of carboxymethyl cellulose acrylate for various biomedical applications. Biomed Mater 1:85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Pandey M, Mohamad N, Low W-L et al (2017) Microwaved bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel microparticles for the healing of partial thickness burn wounds. Drug Deliv Transl Res 7:89–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Pang J, Liu X, Yang J et al (2016) Synthesis of highly polymerized water-soluble cellulose acetate by the side reaction in carboxylate ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Sci Rep 6:33725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  165. Papageorgiou SK, Kouvelos EP, Favvas EP et al (2010) Metal–carboxylate interactions in metal–alginate complexes studied with FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 345:469–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Pardeike J, Hommoss A, Müller RH (2009) Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int J Pharm 366:170–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.10.003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Park SY, Marsh KS, Rhim JW (2002) Characteristics of different molecular weight chitosan films affected by the type of organic solvents. J Food Sci 67:194–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Pasqui D, De Cagna M, Barbucci R (2012) Polysaccharide-based hydrogels: the key role of water in affecting mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel) 4:1517–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Peh K, Khan T, Ch’ng H (2000) Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan films for wound dressing. J Pharm Pharm Sci 3:303–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Pereira VA, de Arruda INQ, Stefani R (2015) Active chitosan/PVA films with anthocyanins from Brassica oleraceae (Red Cabbage) as time–temperature indicators for application in intelligent food packaging. Food Hydrocoll 43:180–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Pourjavadi A, Ghasemzadeh H, Mojahedi F (2009) Swelling properties of CMC-g-poly (AAm-co-AMPS) superabsorbent hydrogel. J Appl Polym Sci 113:3442–3449.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Prabaharan M, Mano JF (2006) Stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on polysaccharides incorporated with thermo-responsive polymers as novel biomaterials. Macromol Biosci 6:991–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Prajapati VD, Maheriya PM, Jani GK, Solanki HK (2014) Carrageenan: a natural seaweed polysaccharide and its applications. Carbohydr Polym 105:97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. Pranoto Y, Rakshit SK, Salokhe VM (2005a) Enhancing antimicrobial activity of chitosan films by incorporating garlic oil, potassium sorbate and nisin. LWT Food Sci Technol 38:859–865.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2004.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Pranoto Y, Salokhe VM, Rakshit SK (2005b) Physical and antibacte rial properties of alginate-based edible film incorporated with garlic oil. Food Res Int 38:267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Qiu X, Hu S (2013) “Smart” materials based on cellulose: a review of the preparations, properties, and applications. Materials (Basel) 6:738–781.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6030738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Racine L, Texier I, Auzély-Velty R (2017) Chitosan-based hydrogels: recent design concepts to tailor properties and functions. Polym Int 66:981–998.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Ramos ÓL, Fernandes JC, Silva SI et al (2012) Edible films and coatings from whey proteins: a review on formulation, and on mechanical and bioactive properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 52:533–552.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.500528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Remondetto GE, Subirade M (2003) Molecular mechanisms of Fe2+−induced beta-lactoglobulin cold gelation. Biopolymers 69:461–469.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.10423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Remya P, Nicolas J, Nicole L (2012) Photodegradable iron (III) cross-linked alginate gels. Biomacromolecules 13:2465–2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Rhein-Knudsen N, Ale MT, Meyer AS (2015) Seaweed hydrocolloid production: an update on enzyme assisted extraction and modification technologies. Mar Drugs 13:3340–3359.  https://doi.org/10.3390/md13063340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. Rhim J-W, Gennadios A, Weller CL et al (1998) Soy protein isolate–dialdehyde starch films1Journal Series No. 12010, Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. This study was conducted at the Industrial Agricultural Products Center. Ind Crop Prod 8:195–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(98)00003-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Ribeiro C, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA, Miranda C (2007) Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biol Technol 44:63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Rinaudo M (2008) Main properties and current applications of some polysaccharides as biomaterials. Polym Int 57:397–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Ring SG (1985) Some studies on starch gelation. Starch Stärke 37:80–83.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19850370303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Romero-Bastida CA, Bello-Pérez LA, García MA et al (2005) Physicochemical and microstructural characterization of films prepared by thermal and cold gelatinization from non-conventional sources of starches. Carbohydr Polym 60:235–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Römling U (2002) Molecular biology of cellulose production in bacteria. Res Microbiol 153:205–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Rong Huei C, Hwa H-D (1996) Effect of molecular weight of chitosan with the same degree of deacetylation on the thermal, mechanical, and permeability properties of the prepared membrane. Carbohydr Polym 29:353–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(96)00007-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, Perrier S (2009) Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38:2046–2064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  190. Roy N, Saha N, Sáha P (2011) Biodegradable hydrogel film for food packaging. In: Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on engineering mechanics, structures, engineering geology (EMESEG’11), Corfu Islands, Greece. pp 329–334Google Scholar
  191. Rudyardjo DI, Wijayanto S (2017) The synthesis and characterization of hydrogel chitosan-alginate with the addition of plasticizer lauric acid for wound dressing application. In: Journal of physics: conference series. IOP Publishing, p 12042Google Scholar
  192. Sajilata MG, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR (2006) Resistant starch—a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 5:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sannino A, Esposito A, Nicolais L et al (2000) Cellulose-based hydrogels as body water retainers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 11:247–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Sannino A, Mensitieri G, Nicolais L (2004) Water and synthetic urine sorption capacity of cellulose-based hydrogels under a compressive stress field. J Appl Polym Sci 91:3791–3796.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.13540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Sannino A, Demitri C, Madaghiele M (2009) Biodegradable cellulose-based hydrogels: design and applications. Materials (Basel) 2:353–373.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2020353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Santo VE, Frias AM, Carida M et al (2009) Carrageenan-based hydrogels for the controlled delivery of PDGF-BB in bone tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 10:1392–1401.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm8014973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Sayanjali S, Ghanbarzadeh B, Ghiassifar S (2011) Evaluation of antimicrobial and physical properties of edible film based on carboxymethyl cellulose containing potassium sorbate on some mycotoxigenic Aspergillus species in fresh pistachios. LWT Food Sci Technol 44:1133–1138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Shahbazi M, Ahmadi SJ, Seif A, Rajabzadeh G (2016) Carboxymethyl cellulose film modification through surface photo-crosslinking and chemical crosslinking for food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll 61:378–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.04.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Shewan HM, Stokes JR (2013) Review of techniques to manufacture micro-hydrogel particles for the food industry and their applications. J Food Eng 119:781–792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.06.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Shi K, Huang Y, Yu H et al (2011) Reducing the brittleness of zein films through chemical modification. J Agric Food Chem 59:56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103164rCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Shit SC, Shah PM (2014) Edible polymers: challenges and opportunities. J Polym 2014:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Shukla R, Cheryan M (2001) Zein: the industrial protein from corn. Ind Crop Prod 13:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Sikorski P, Mo F, Skjak-Braek G, Stokke BT (2007) Evidence for egg-box-compatible interactions in calcium-alginate gels from fiber X-ray diffraction. Biomacromolecules 8:2098–2103.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0701503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. Siripatrawan U, Harte BR (2010) Physical properties and antioxidant activity of an active film from chitosan incorporated with green tea extract. Food Hydrocoll 24:770–775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Siripatrawan U, Vitchayakitti W (2016) Improving functional properties of chitosan films as active food packaging by incorporating with propolis. Food Hydrocoll 61:695–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Smithers GW, John Ballard F, Copeland AD et al (1996) New opportunities from the isolation and utilization of whey proteins. J Dairy Sci 79:1454–1459.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76504-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Somerville C (2006) Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:53–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  208. Song F, Zhang L-M, Yang C, Yan L (2009) Genipin-crosslinked casein hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Int J Pharm 373:41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.02.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  209. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2000a) Oxygen permeability and mechanical properties of films from hydrolyzed whey protein. J Agric Food Chem 48:3913–3916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2000b) Water vapor permeability and solubility of films from hydrolyzed whey protein. J Food Sci 65:700–703.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16075.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Sothornvit R, Rhim J-W, Hong S-I (2009) Effect of nano-clay type on the physical and antimicrobial properties of whey protein isolate/clay composite films. J Food Eng 91:468–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Sreeram KJ, Yamini Shrivastava H, Nair BU (2004) Studies on the nature of interaction of iron(III) with alginates. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1670:121–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Su K, Wang C (2015) Recent advances in the use of gelatin in biomedical research. Biotechnol Lett 37:2139–2145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1907-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  214. Suárez G, Gutiérrez TJ (2017) Recent advances in the development of biodegadable films and foams from cassava starch. In: Klein C (ed) Handbook on cassava: production, potential uses and recent advances. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 297–312. ISBN: 978-1-53610-307-6Google Scholar
  215. Sun J, Tan H (2013) Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications. Materials (Basel) 6:1285–1309.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6041285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Sung HW, Huang RN, Huang LL, Tsai CC (1999) In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 10:63–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Tansaz S, Durmann A, Detsch R, Boccaccini AR (2017) Hydrogel films and microcapsules based on soy protein isolate combined with alginate. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Tavares GM, Croguennec T, Carvalho AF, Bouhallab S (2014) Milk proteins as encapsulation devices and delivery vehicles: applications and trends. Trends Food Sci Technol 37:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Tavassoli-Kafrani E, Shekarchizadeh H, Masoudpour-Behabadi M (2016) Development of edible films and coatings from alginates and carrageenans. Carbohydr Polym 137:360–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. Tomihata K, Ikada Y (1997) In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials 18:567–575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00167-6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Trojani C, Weiss P, Michiels J-F et al (2005) Three-dimensional culture and differentiation of human osteogenic cells in an injectable hydroxypropylmethylcellulose hydrogel. Biomaterials 26:5509–5517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. Varshney VK, Naithani S (2011) Chemical functionalization of cellulose derived from nonconventional sources. In: Cellulose fibers: bio-and nano-polymer composites. Springer, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  223. Videcoq P, Garnier C, Robert P, Bonnin E (2011) Influence of calcium on pectin methylesterase behaviour in the presence of medium methylated pectins. Carbohydr Polym 86:1657–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Wang LZ, Liu L, Holmes J et al (2007) Assessment of film-forming potential and properties of protein and polysaccharide-based biopolymer films. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:1128–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Wang H, Qian J, Ding F (2017a) Emerging chitosan-based films for food packaging applications. J Agric Food Chem 66(2):395–413.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Wang X, Yu T, Chen G et al (2017b) Preparation and characterization of a chitosan/gelatin/extracellular matrix scaffold and its application in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 23:169–179.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2016.0511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. Wieser H (2007) Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol 24:115–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  228. Willats WGT, Knox JP, Mikkelsen JD (2006) Pectin: new insights into an old polymer are starting to gel. Trends Food Sci Technol 17:97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Wu C, Peng S, Wen C et al (2012) Structural characterization and properties of konjac glucomannan/curdlan blend films. Carbohydr Polym 89:497–503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Wu J, Ge S, Liu H et al (2014) Properties and antimicrobial activity of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) skin gelatin-chitosan films incorporated with oregano essential oil for fish preservation. Food Packaging Shelf Life 2:7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Xiong H, Tang S, Tang H, Zou P (2008) The structure and properties of a starch-based biodegradable film. Carbohydr Polym 71:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Yapo BM (2011) Pectic substances: from simple pectic polysaccharides to complex pectins—a new hypothetical model. Carbohydr Polym 86:373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Yu S, Zhang X, Tan G et al (2017) A novel pH-induced thermosensitive hydrogel composed of carboxymethyl chitosan and poloxamer cross-linked by glutaraldehyde for ophthalmic drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 155:208–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  234. Zakaria S, Bakar NHA (2015) Extraction and characterization of gelatin from black tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) scales and bones. In: International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering, Technology & Natural Resources (ICASETNR-15). pp 27–28Google Scholar
  235. Zargar V, Asghari M, Dashti A (2015) A review on chitin and chitosan polymers: structure, chemistry, solubility, derivatives, and applications. ChemBioEng Rev 2:204–226.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201400025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Zhai M, Yoshii F, Kume T, Hashim K (2002) Syntheses of PVA/starch grafted hydrogels by irradiation. Carbohydr Polym 50:295–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00031-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Zhang X, Do MD, Casey P et al (2010) Chemical modification of gelatin by a natural phenolic cross-linker, tannic acid. J Agric Food Chem 58:6809–6815.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1004226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  238. Zhao R, Torley P, Halley PJ (2008) Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:3058–3071.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2434-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Zhuang C, Tao F, Cui Y (2017) Eco-friendly biorefractory films of gelatin and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose ester for food packaging application. J Sci Food Agric 97:3384–3395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  240. Zubeldía F, Ansorena MR, Marcovich NE (2015) Wheat gluten films obtained by compression molding. Polym Test 43:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akbar Ali
    • 1
  • Shakeel Ahmed
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryGovernment Degree College MendharPoonchIndia

Personalised recommendations