Advertisement

Evaluating Deep Retrofit Strategies for Buildings in Urban Waterfronts

  • Nicola StrazzaEmail author
  • Piero Sdrigotti
  • Carlo Antonio Stival
  • Raul Berto
Chapter
Part of the Innovative Renewable Energy book series (INREE)

Abstract

The renovation and requalification of existing building stock and the exploitation of renewable energy sources are considered key actions in the European Energy Roadmap to 2050.

In this scope, a noticeable potential application is represented by urban constrained built heritage, whose rehabilitation can be considered both as a strategy for its conservation and an enhancement of competitiveness for a sustainable city.

The proposed research evaluates the potential of scalable retrofit strategies in existing buildings through the exploitation of on-site renewable energy sources available in urban waterfront. The methodology starts with the collection of data concerning environmental and climate conditions, predictable building energy demand for heating and cooling services, and timescales of available on-site renewable energy sources.

The approach has been tested by the development of a detailed building energy model (BEM) for a constrained building in the urban waterfront of Trieste, in Northeastern Italy; the building construction dates back to the early 1980s and it is located in a valuable historical and cultural context. According to the preliminary rehabilitation proposal by Trieste Municipality, a baseline energetic model has been carried out to evaluate and optimize retrofit strategies for building envelope and energy systems, including renewable energy source exploitation.

The study considers particularly hydrothermal energy stored in sea basin that could play a significant role in urban waterfronts contexts. The main results show that the most effective adaptation strategies are characterized by key factors such as envelope thermal inertia in reducing heating and cooling demand in middle seasons, thermal effects of roof greening, and the combination of plants that exploit several discontinuous renewable sources and accumulation systems, such as photovoltaic systems and sea hydrothermal energy.

This paper looks at a strategic vision that focuses the need to manage plant systems through advanced commissioning or by developing an integrated smart thermal grid.

This research is embedded in a pilot project concerning the development of a low-temperature thermal grid in the waterfront of the old town of Trieste.

Keywords

Urban waterfront Hydrothermal energy Mediterranean climate Heritage rehabilitation 

References

  1. 1.
    De Santoli L (2015) Reprint of guidelines on energy efficiency of cultural heritage. Energ Buildings 95:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Commission of the European Communities (2005) Green Paper on energy efficiency or Doing more with lessGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Italian Government (2004) Legislative Decree n. 42/2004 of the Italian Government. Code of cultural heritage and landscapeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Italian Government (2005) Ministerial Decree n. 192/2005 of the Italian Government. Implementation of Directive 2002/91/CE on energy efficiency in buildingsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Italian Government (2015) Interministerial Decree of the Italian Government 26 June 2015. Application of energy performances calculation methodologies and definition of mandatory prescriptions and requirements of buildingsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Italian Government (2013) Decree-Law of the Italian Government 4 June 2013, No. 63. Urgent provisions for the transposition of Directive 2010/31/UE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings for the definition of infringement procedures started by European Commission, and other provisions on social cohesionGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friotherm AG, Ropsten V (2005) The largest sea water heat pump facility worldwide, with 6 Unitop® 50FY and 180 MW total capacity. Friotherm AG, WinterthurGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riipinen M (2013) District heating and cooling in Helsinki. In: Proceedings of the international CHP/DHC workshop, Paris, 12–13 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friotherm AG (2005) Oslo – Fornebu. Sustainable development with a district heating/cooling system using a Unitop® 28/22CY. Friotherm AG, WinterthurGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao ZK, Han H, Gu B, Zhang L, Hu ST (2009) Application of seawater source heat pump. J Energy Inst 82:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell MS, Spitler JD (2012) Open-loop direct surface water cooling and surface water heat pump systems – a review. HVAC&R Res J 19(2):125–140Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schumacher P (2015) Energy efficiency for Eu historic districts sustainability. Smart management and integration of renewable and energy efficiency solutions. BAU Münich, Münich, 19–24th Jan 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vieites E, Vassileva I, Arias JE (2015) European initiatives towards improving the energy efficiency in existing and historic buildings. Energy Procedia 75:1679–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pisello AL, Petrozzi A, Castaldo VL, Cotana F (2016) On an innovative integrated technique for energy refurbishment of historical buildings: thermal-energy, economic and environmental analysis of a case study. Appl Energy 162:1313–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moschella A, Salemi A, Lo Faro A, Sanfilippo G, Detommaso M, Privitera A (2013) Historic buildings in Mediterranean area and solar thermal technologies: architectural integration vs preservation criteria. Energy Procedia 42:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allegrini J, Orehounig K, Mavromatidis G, Ruesch F, Dorer V, Evins R (2015) A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1391–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gagliano A, Detommaso M, Nocera F, Evola G (2015) A multi-criteria methodology for comparing the energy and environmental behaviour of cool, green and traditional roofs. Build Environ 34:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Athienitis A, O’Brien W (eds) (2015) Modeling, design, and optimization of net-zero energy buildings. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keirstread J, Nilay S (eds) (2013) Urban energy systems: an integrated approach. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gang W, Wang S (2016) District cooling systems: technology integration, system optimization, challenges and opportunities for applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iammarino L, Ricci P (Trieste Municipality, 2014) Preliminary project for Ex Meccanografico building renovationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ceranic B, Latham D, Dean A (2015) Sustainable design and building information modelling: case study of energy plus house, Hieron’s Wood, Derbyshire UK. Energy Procedia 83:434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flemming HC (2002) Biofouling in water systems – cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59(6):629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ezgi C, Ozbalta N (2012) Optimization of heat exchanger cleaning cycle on a ship. J Nav Sci Eng 8:133–146Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saiz S, Kennedy C, Bass B, Pressnail K (2006) Comparative life cycle assessment of standard and green roofs. Environ Sci Technol 40:4312–4316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt RR, Fevrier N, Dumas P (2013) Smart cities and communities. Key to innovation integrated solution. Smart Thermal Grids, versionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Strazza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Piero Sdrigotti
    • 1
  • Carlo Antonio Stival
    • 2
  • Raul Berto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of TriesteTrieste(IT)Italy
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPadova(IT)Italy

Personalised recommendations