Advertisement

Public Regulatory Trends in Sustainable Real Estate

  • Pernille H. Christensen
  • Jeremy Gabe
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the three main instruments which planning authorities can use to influence the uptake of sustainable development practices: forward planning, development controls and development incentives. The potential of mandatory disclosure and integrated reporting to mainstream sustainability as a decision criterion is explored, with international examples offering guidance on how the public sector can guide industry in the adoption and implementation of sustainable practices. Finally, this chapter assesses the role of public-sector sustainable procurement practices in stimulating the green economy. It proposes three recommendations to improve the efficacy of public policy to increase the uptake of sustainable development practice across both public and private sectors. A common thread in these recommendations is the need for a collaborative approach creating stakeholder buy in and a need to resource the application of the UN Sustainable Development Goals at all levels of planning policy.

References

  1. Adams, C. A., Muir, S., & Hoque, Z. (2014). Measurement of Sustainability Performance in the Public Sector. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 46–67.  https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2012-0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, S. C., Moorman, C. E., Peterson, M. N., Hess, G. R., & Moore, S. E. (2012). Overcoming Socio-Economic Barriers to Conservation Subdivisions: A Case-Study of Four Successful Communities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amati, M. (Ed.). (2008). Urban Green Belts in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Amati, M., & Yokohari, M. (2006). Temporal Changes and Local Variations in the Functions of London’s Green Belt. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, A., Wright, C., Ashea, B., & Nielsen, H. (2017). Enabling Innovation in Building Sustainability: Australia’s National Construction Code. Procedia Engineering, 180(1), 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audirac, I., Fol, S., & Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2010). Shrinking Cities in a Time of Crisis. Berkeley Planning Journal, 23(1), 51–57.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, A., Grubnic, S., & Birchall, F. (2014). Sustainability Accounting and Accountability in the Public Sector. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 176–195). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Beare, D., Buslovich, R., & Searcy, C. (2014). Linkages Between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Public Policy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 336–350.  https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brain, D. (2005). From Good Neighbourhoods to Sustainable Cities: Social Science and the Social Agenda of the New Urbanism. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable Procurement in the Public Sector: An International Comparative Study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 452–476.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. British Standards Institute (BSI). (2016). PAS 2080:2016 Carbon Management in Infrastructure. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  13. Centre for International Economics. (2012). Benefits of Building Regulation Reform. Canberra: Centre for International Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, G., Wiedmann, T., Wang, Y., & Hadjikakou, M. (2016). Transnational City Carbon Ffootprint Networks – Exploring Carbon Links Between Australian and Chinese Cities. Applied Energy, 184(1), 1082–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, P. H. (2012). Key Strategies of Sustainable Real Estate Decision-Making in the United States: A Delphi Study of the Stakeholders. Diss. Clemson U, Print.Google Scholar
  16. Christensen, P. H. (2017). A Post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) Framework for Strategic Planning, Assessment and Management Decision Making for US Sustainable Commercial Real Estate. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 35(6), 1–32.Google Scholar
  17. Christensen, P. H., & Sayce, S. (2015). Planning and Regulatory Issues Impacting Sustainable Property Development. In S. J. Wilkinson, S. L. Sayce, & P. H. Christensen (Eds.), Developing Property Sustainably. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. City of Seattle. (2013). Seattle Design Guidelines. Department of Planning and Development. Retrieved August 12, 2017, from www.seattle.gov/dpd/cs/groups/pan/@pan/documents/web_informational/p2083771.pdf.
  19. Clark, D. (2003). Incentives for Sustainable Buildings in Australia – A Designer’s Perspective. Sinclair Knight Merz Technical Paper. Melbourne: Sinclair Knight Merz. Retrieved September 15, from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.574.8495&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  20. Costonis, J. (1972). The Chicago Plan: Incentive Zoning and the Preservation of Urban Landmarks. Faculty Scholarship. Paper 63. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship/63.
  21. Dunham-Jones, E., & Williamson, J. (2011). Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2008). Public Procurement for a Better Environment, COM(2008) 400: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 16 September 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0400
  23. European Commission. (2013). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Building the Single Market for Green Products – Facilitating Better Information on the Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 16 September 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0196:FIN:%20EN:PDF
  24. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., & Chen, D. (2007). Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Chicago, IL: Urban Land Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Farneti, F., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organisations: Why they Report. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Global Reporting Initiative. (2005). GRI Sector Supplement for Public Agencies. Retrieved February 23, 2018, from www.globalreporting.org/information/g4/sector-guidance/sector-guidance/pilot-versions/public-agency/Pages/default.aspx.
  27. Global Reporting Initiative. (2013, January 10). GRI Reporting: Public Sector Progress. Retrieved February 23, 2018, from www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-reporting-Public-sector-progress.aspx.
  28. Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments. (2016). Roadmap for Localizing the SDGs: Implementation and Monitoring at Subnational Level. Retrieved September 16, 2017, from https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/roadmap_for_localizing_the_sdgs_0.pdf
  29. Göçmen, Z. A., & LaGro, J. A., Jr. (2016). Assessing Local Planning Capacity to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Residential Development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(8), 1513–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1080673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gurran, N. (2011). Australian Urban Land Use Planning: Principles, Systems and Practice (2nd ed.). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organizations. Public Money and Management, 28(6), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, T. (2011). Proactive Engagement in Urban Design – The Case of Chelmsford. In S. Tiesdell & D. Adams (Eds.), Real Estate Issues: Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process (pp. 74–91). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hargroves, K. (2015). Low Carbon Inclusions in Commonwealth and NSW Government Built Environment Sector Procurement. Sydney: CRC for Low Carbon Living Ltd.Google Scholar
  34. Hartwell, J. (2013). Sustainable Procurement. In A. Cotgrave & M. Riley (Eds.), Total Sustainability in the Built Environment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. International Council for Science (ICSU). (2015). ISSC Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
  36. ISEAL Alliance. 2013. London: ISEAL Alliance. Retrieved September 18, from www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/ISEALSPP-Report-Full-Document.pdf.
  37. Jacobsen, G. D., & Kotchen, M. J. (2013). Are Building Codes Effective at Saving Energy? Evidence from Residential Billing Data in Florida. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
  38. Jacobus, R. (2015). Inclusionary Housing Creating and Maintaining Inclusive Communities. Policy Focus Report. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  39. Jepson, E. J., Jr., & Haines, A. L. (2014). Zoning for Sustainability: A Review and Analysis of the Zoning Ordinances of 32 Cities in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(3), 239–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.981200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ji, H., & Darnall, N. (2017). All Are Not Created Equal: Assessing Local Governments’ Strategic Approaches Towards Sustainability. Public Management Review, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1293147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lens, M. C., & Monkkonen, P. (2015). Do Strict Land Use Regulations Make Metropolitan Areas More Segregated by Income? Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(1), 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newton, P., Pears, A., Whiteman, J., & Astle, R. (2012). The Energy and Carbon Footprints of Urban Housing and Transport: Current Trends and Future Prospects. In R. Tomlinson (Ed.), The Unintended City. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, D. R., & Davison, E. B. (2009). Evaluation of In-Lieu Fees and Offsite Construction as Incentives for Affordable Housing Production. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(2), 27–60.Google Scholar
  44. Randolph, J. (2011). Environmental Land Use Planning and Management (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  45. Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2011). Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, T., & Manley, K. (2011). Development of the Sustainable Building and Construction Products Industry in Australia. In J. W. F. Wamelink, R. P. Geraedts, & L. Volker (Eds.), MISBE2011: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment (pp. 1–9). Amsterdam: Delft University of Technology Accessed September 12, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46225/Google Scholar
  47. Saha, D., & Paterson, R. G. (2008). Local Government Efforts to Promote the “Three Es” of Sustainable Development Survey in Medium to Large Cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(1), 21–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08321803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sayce, S., Ellison, L., & Parnell, P. (2007). Understanding Investment Drivers for UK Sustainable Property. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 629–643.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701559515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schilling, J., & Logan, J. (2008). Greening the Rust Belt: A Green Infrastructure Model for Right Sizing America’s Shrinking Cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schindler, S. B. (2010). Following Industry’s LEED: Municipal Adoption of Private Green Building Standards. Florida Law Review, 62(2), 285–350.Google Scholar
  51. Schwieterman, J. P., & Caspall, D. M. (2006). The Politics of Place: A History of Zoning in Chicago. Chicago: Lake Claremont Press.Google Scholar
  52. Talen, E. (2013). Zoning For and Against Sprawl: The Case for Form-Based Codes. Journal of Urban Design, 18(2), 175–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1337495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teh, S. H., Wiedmann, T., Schinabeck, J., Rowley, H., & Moore, S. (2015). Integrated Carbon Metrics and Assessment for the Built Environment. Procedia CIRP, 29(1), 480–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and Opportunities of Green Public Procurement: An Effective Tool for Sustainable Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1893–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved August 12, from sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
  56. United Nations. (2016). United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved 12 August 2017, from www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
  57. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III). (2017). A/RES/71/256: New Urban Agenda. ISBN: 978-92-1-132731-1. Retrieved August 12, 2017, from habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda
  58. World Green Building Council. (2013). The Business Case for Green Building: A Review of the Costs and Benefits for Developers, Investors and Occupants. Retrieved September 15, 2017, from www.worldgbc.org/sites/default/files/Business_Case_For_Green_Building_Report_WEB_2013-04-11-2.pdf.
  59. Zhao, P. (2011). Managing Urban Growth in a Transforming China: Evidence from Beijing. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations