Mammographic Breast Density and Its Effects on Imaging
Mammographic breast density (MBD) is a term used to define the proportion of radiologically dense tissue in the breast.
MBD has been shown to be a strong predictor of mammography screening failure to detect breast cancer because it has a “masking effect” on underlying cancers and is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Relative to the lowest classification of breast density (fatty tissue, <5%), women with the highest classification (extreme density, >75%) may have a four- to sixfold increased risk of breast cancer.
Over the years, many breast density measurement methods have been introduced, and the development of automated quantitative density assessment software is an active area of research.
MBD assessment has clinical utility for identifying women at increased risk of developing breast cancer and determining which women would benefit from supplemental screening. Supplemental screening of women with dense breasts using different imaging technologies detects additional breast cancers, most of which are invasive, but increases false-positives, with the exception of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
KeywordsBreast density Mammographic density Quantitative assessment Qualitative assessment Tomosynthesis Supplemental screening Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM)
- 10.ACR. Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®). 3rd ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 1998.Google Scholar
- 11.ACR. Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.Google Scholar
- 12.ACR. Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®) Atlas. 5th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2014.Google Scholar
- 16.Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44.Google Scholar
- 33.Lindström S, Vachon CM, Li J, et al. Common variants in ZNF365 are associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2011;43(3):185–7. Pearce MS, Tennant PW, Mann KD, et al. Lifecourse predictors of mammographic density: the Newcastle Thousand Families Cohort Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;131(1):187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Are You Dense Inc. Are you dense? Exposing the best-kept secret. https://www.areyoudense.org. Accessed 28 Mar 2017.
- 40.Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G, Durando M, Tosto S, Monetti F, Airaldi S, Bignotti B, Nori J, Bagni A, Signori A, Sormani MP, Houssami N. Adjunct screening with Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in women with mammography—negative dense breast: interim report of a prospective comparative Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(16):1882–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Bernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017;122(10):723–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar