Advertisement

Formidability and Alliance Politics in Humans and Nonhuman Species

  • Christopher D. Watkins
Chapter

Abstract

Here an overview of the role of traits related to dominance in ‘alliance politics’ in other species and humans of diverse cultural backgrounds is presented. The importance of alliances from the point of view of evolutionary biology and the technology used to investigate the formation of preferences for other people based on minimal information such as their facial appearance is also presented. A research agenda for future work in this area outlining the importance of understanding how we might seek (or avoid) a dominant-looking individual as an ally then forms the foundation for two specific recommendations for further research. The use of new media presents novel challenges for how we evaluate politicians based on both first impression judgements and our own allegiances.

References

  1. Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2012). Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature, 481(7382), 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 1–63.Google Scholar
  3. Bendahan, S., Zehnder, C., Pralong, F. P., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Leader corruption depends on power and testosterone. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception, 22(3), 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya, K., Ghosh, A., Monsivais, D., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Kaski, K. (2016). Sex differences in social focus across the life cycle in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324(5932), 1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, W. W. (2015). The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 733–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caro, T. M., & Collins, D. A. (1987). Male cheetah social organization and territoriality. Ethology, 74(1), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carré, J. M. (2009). No place like home: Testosterone responses to victory depend on game location. American Journal of Human Biology, 21(3), 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R., & Barre, L. M. (1999). Superalliance of bottlenose dolphins. Nature, 397(6720), 571–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R., & Barre, L. M. (2001). Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance’. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268(1464), 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan, M. L., Watkins, C. D., Fraccaro, P. J., Feinberg, D. R., & Little, A. C. (2016). It’s the way he tells them (and who is listening): Men’s dominance is positively correlated with their preference for jokes told by dominant-sounding men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(2), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curry, O. S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Vasdev, S. (2001). Income inequality and homicide rates in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 219–236.Google Scholar
  16. David-Barrett, T., Kertesz, J., Rotkirch, A., Ghosh, A., Bhattacharya, K., Monsivais, D., & Kaski, K. (2016). Communication with family and friends across the life course. PLoS ONE, 11, e0165687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. David-Barrett, T., Rotkirch, A., Carney, J., Izquierdo, I. B., Krems, J. A., Townley, D., … Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015). Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: Cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., … Quattrochiocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113(3), 554–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS ONE, 4, e5802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffy, K. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Silk, J. B. (2007). Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities. Current Biology, 17(15), R586–R587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emlen, D. J. (2008). The evolution of animal weapons. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feh, C. (1999). Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Animal Behaviour, 57(3), 705–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Little, A. C. (2008). Correlated preferences for men’s facial and vocal masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(1), 10–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large scale social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337, a2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fraser, O. N., & Bugnyar, T. (2012). Reciprocity of agonistic support in ravens. Animal Behaviour, 83(1), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fruhen, L. S., Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2015). Perceptions of facial attractiveness, dominance and trustworthiness predict managerial pay awards in experimental tasks. Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galton, F. (1878). Composite portraits made by combining those of many different persons into a single figure. Nature, 18, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gavrilets, S., Auerbach, J., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Convergence to consensus in heterogeneous groups and the emergence of informal leadership. Scientific Reports, 6, 29704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilby, I. C., Brent, L. J. N., Wroblewski, E. E., Rudicell, R. S., Hahn, B. H., Goodall, J., & Pusey, A. E. (2013). Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(3), 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glowacki, L., & von Rueden, C. (2015). Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1683), 20150010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Harcourt, A. H., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harcourt, J. L., Zen Ang, T., Sweetman, G., Johnstone, R. A., & Manica, A. (2009). Leadership, personality and social feedback. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 2(4), 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, D. D. P., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(8), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, D. D. P., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). The evolution of overconfidence. Nature, 477(7364), 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, D. D. P., McDermott, R., Barrett, E. S., Cowden, J., Wrangham, R., McIntyre, M. H., & Rosen, S. P. (2006). Overconfidence in wargames: Experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273(1600), 2513–2520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 428–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Judge, T. A., Hurst, C., & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 742–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kandrick, M., Hahn, A. C., Han, C., Wincenciak, J., Fisher, C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2017). Does the interaction between cortisol and testosterone predict men’s facial attractiveness? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(4), 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segall, M. H. (1981). A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology, 2(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. King, A. J., Johnson, D. D. P., & van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19(19), R911–R916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kraus, S. (1988). Televised presidential debates and public policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li, N. P., Griskevickius, V., Durante, K. M., Jonason, P. K., Pasisz, D. J., & Aumer, K. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on humor: Sexual selection or interest indicator? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 923–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366(1571), 1638–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Macfarlan, S. J., Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V., & Chagnon, N. A. (2014). Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(47), 16662–16669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246(5427), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Neave, N., & Wolfson, S. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiology and Behavior, 78(2), 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noë, R., & Sluijter, A. (1995). Which adult male savanna baboons form coalitions? International Journal of Primatology, 16(1), 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1982). Cooperation and competition within coalitions of male lions: Kin selection or game theory? Nature, 296(5859), 740–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., … Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perry, S., Barrett, H. C., & Manson, J. H. (2004). White-faced capuchin monkeys show triadic awareness in their choice of allies. Animal Behaviour, 67(1), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Sell, A., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). The ancestral logic of politics: Upper body strength regulates men’s assertion of self-interest over economic redistribution. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1098–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  65. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  66. Pound, N., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Surridge, A. K. (2009). Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276(1654), 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Price, M. E., Kang, J., Dunn, J., & Hopkins, S. (2011). Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Price, M. E., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Sidanius, J., & Pound, N. (2017). Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 626–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Puts, D. A., Apicella, C. L., & Cárdenas, R. A. (2012). Masculine voices signal men’s threat potential in forager and industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 279, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Re, D. E., Hunter, D. W., Coetzee, V., Tiddeman, B. P., Xiao, D., DeBruine, L. M., … Perrett, D. (2013). Looking like a leader: Facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability. PLoS ONE, 8, e80957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T. (2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31(2), 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. G., Jr., Ozono, H., Nakashima, S., Yoshikawa, S., & Watabe, M. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Santos, E. S. A., Scheck, D., & Nakagawa, S. (2011). Dominance and plumage traits: Meta-analysis and metaregression analysis. Animal Behaviour, 82(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schülke, O., Bhagavatula, J., Vigilant, L., & Ostner, J. (2010). Social bonds enhance reproductive success in male macaques. Current Biology, 20(24), 2207–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276(1656), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Setchell, J. M., & Dixson, A. F. (2001). Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) are associated with gain and loss of alpha status. Hormones and Behavior, 39(3), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sherman, G. D., Lerner, J. S., Josephs, R. A., Renshon, J., & Gross, J. J. (2015). The interaction of testosterone and cortisol is associated with attained status in male executives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 921–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21(3), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taylor, S. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thomsen, L., Frankenhuis, W. E., Ingold-Smith, M., & Carey, S. (2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331(6016), 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(5), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predicts election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1631), 20130080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Vugt, M., & Grabo, A. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership: An Evolutionary-psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 6484–6489.Google Scholar
  89. von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 278, 2223–2232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walker, P. L. (2001). A bioarcheological perspective on the history of violence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Watkins, C. D. (2013). Cues derived from facial appearance in security-related contexts: A biological and socio-cognitive framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Watkins, C. D., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners. Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2016). Competition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in allies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(12), 2071–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Watkins, C. D., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010a). Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 967–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Watkins, C. D., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010b). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21(5), 943–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Whitehead, H., & Connor, R. C. (2005). Alliances I: How large should alliances be? Animal Behaviour, 69(1), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Abertay UniversityDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations