Advertisement

Study of Annotations in e-health Domain

  • Khalil Chehab
  • Anis Kalboussi
  • Ahmed Hadj Kacem
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10898)

Abstract

The efforts to computerize the medical record of a patient began in 1990. In the documents of this record, the healthcare professional practices the annotation activity. Most medical annotation systems are made to perform a specific task. As a result, we have dozens of medical annotation system that we sneak a fragmented image in the absence of generic classification for these. In this article, we try to present a unified image by classifying 30 medical annotation systems based on 5 generic criteria and the features offered by them. From these two classifications, we present our observation and the limits of these systems.

Keywords

e-heath Annotation Classification Health record Annotation system Healthcare professionals 

References

  1. 1.
    Storck, M., Krumm, R., Dugas, M.: ODMSummary: a tool for automatic structured comparison of multiple medical forms based on semantic annotation with the unified medical language system. PLoS One 11(10), e0164569 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Segura, J., Sanchez-Garcia, R., Martinez, M., Cuenca-Alba, J., Tabas-Madrid, D., Sorzano, C.O.S., Carazo, J.M.: 3DBIONOTES v2. 0: a web server for the automatic annotation of macromolecular structures. Bioinformatics 33(22), 3655–3657 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McKain, M.R., Hartsock, R.H., Wohl, M.M., Kellogg, E.A.: Verdant: automated annotation, alignment and phylogenetic analysis of whole chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics 33(1), 130–132 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lavrič, P., Bohak, C., Marolt, M.: Collaborative view-aligned annotations in web-based 3D medical data visualization. In: 2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 259–263. IEEE, May 2017 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vizza, P., Guzzi, P.H., Veltri, P., Cascini, G.L., Curia, R., Sisca, L.: GIDAC: a prototype for bioimages annotation and clinical data integration. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 1028–1031. IEEE, December 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hart, S.N., Duffy, P., Quest, D.J., Hossain, A., Meiners, M.A., Kocher, J.P.: VCF-Miner: GUI-based application for mining variants and annotations stored in VCF files. Brief. Bioinform. 17(2), 346–351 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banerjee, I., Patanè, G., Spagnuolo, M.: SemAnatomy3D: annotation of patient-specific anatomy (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marrast, P.: Equipement informatique des annotations et des pratiques d’écriture professionnelles: une étude ancrée pour l’organisation des soins en cancérologie. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Toulouse, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deghou, S., Zeller, G., Iskar, M., Driessen, M., Castillo, M., van Noort, V., Bork, P.: CART—a chemical annotation retrieval toolkit. Bioinformatics 32(18), 2869–2871 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clark, T., Ciccarese, P.N., Goble, C.A.: Micropublications: a semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications. J. Biomed. Semant. 5(1), 28 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kocher, J.P.A., Quest, D.J., Duffy, P., Meiners, M.A., Moore, R.M., Rider, D., Dinu, V.: The Biological Reference Repository (BioR): a rapid and flexible system for genomics annotation. Bioinformatics 30(13), 1920–1922 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moreira, D.A., Hage, C., Luque, E.F., Willrett, D., Rubin, D.L.: 3D markup of radiological images in ePAD, a web-based image annotation tool. In: 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 97–102. IEEE, June 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roy, S., Brown, M.S., Shih, G.L.: Visual interpretation with three-dimensional annotations (VITA): three-dimensional image interpretation tool for radiological reporting. J. Digit. Imaging 27(1), 49–57 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pérez-Pérez, M., Glez-Peña, D., Fdez-Riverola, F., Lourenço, A.: Marky: a lightweight web tracking tool for document annotation. In: Saez-Rodriguez, J., Rocha, M., Fdez-Riverola, F., De Paz Santana, J. (eds.) PACBB 2014, pp. 269–276. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07581-5_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tian, L., Zhang, W., Bikakis, A., Wang, H., Yu, Y., Ni, Y., Cao, F.: MeDetect: a LOD-based system for collective entity annotation in biomedicine. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), 2013, vol. 1, pp. 233–240. IEEE, November 2013Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    López-Fernández, H., Reboiro-Jato, M., Glez-Peña, D., Aparicio, F., Gachet, D., Buenaga, M., Fdez-Riverola, F.: BioAnnote: a software platform for annotating biomedical documents with application in medical learning environments. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 111(1), 139–147 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou, J., Lamichhane, S., Sterne, G., Ye, B., Peng, H.: BIOCAT: a pattern recognition platform for customizable biological image classification and annotation. BMC Bioinform. 14(1), 291 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iakovidis, D.K., Goudas, T., Smailis, C., Maglogiannis, I.: Ratsnake: a versatile image annotation tool with application to computer-aided diagnosis. Sci. World J. (2014) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Navarro-Galindo, J.L., Samos, J.: The FLERSA tool: adding semantics to a web content management system. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 8(1), 73–126 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Federico, L., Néstor, D., Oscar, C.: Smitag: a social network for semantic annotation of medical images. In: 2012 XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana En Informatica (CLEI), pp. 1–7. IEEE, October 2012Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mata, C., Oliver, A., Torrent, A., Marti, J.: MammoApplet: an interactive Java applet tool for manual annotation in medical imaging. In: 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), pp. 34–39. IEEE, November 2012Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    David, R., Graf, N., Karatzanis, I., Stenzhorn, H., Manikis, G.C., Sakkalis, V., et al.: Clinical evaluation of DoctorEye platform in nephroblastoma. In: 2012 5th International Advanced Research Workshop on In Silico Oncology and Cancer Investigation-The TUMOR Project Workshop (IARWISOCI), pp. 1–4. IEEE, October 2012Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Möller, M., Regel, S., Sintek, M.: RadSem: semantic annotation and retrieval for medical images. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 21–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Rubin, D.L., Rodriguez, C., Shah, P., Beaulieu, C.: iPad: semantic annotation and markup of radiological images. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2008, p. 626. American Medical Informatics Association (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu, D., Cao, Y., Kim, K.H., Stanek, S., Doungratanaex-Chai, B., Lin, K., et al.: Arthemis: annotation software in an integrated capturing and analysis system for colonoscopy. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 88(2), 152–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bringay, S.: Les annotations pour supporter la collaboration dans le dossier patient électronique Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mrozowski, P., Kononowicz, A.A.: DSS-MEDA a web-based framework for video annotation in medical e-learning. Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems 2(4), 51–56 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Kalboussi, A., Omheni, N., Mazhoud, O., Kacem, A.H.: How to organize the annotation systems in human-computer environment: study, classification and observations. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9297, pp. 115–133. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charlet, J., Bachimont, B., Brunie, V., El Kassar, S., Zweigenbaum, P., Boisvieux, J.F.: Hospitexte: towards a document-based hypertextual electronic medical record. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, p. 713. American Medical Informatics Association (1998)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mille, D.: Modèles et outils logiciels pour l’annotation sémantiquede documentspédagogiques. Doctoral dissertation, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caussanel, J., Cahier, J.P., Zacklad, M., Charlet, J.: Les Topic Maps sont-ils un bon candidat pour l’ingénierie du Web Sémantique? In: Actes des 13e journées francophones d’ingénierie des connaissances (IC). Prix AFIA de la meilleure présentation (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Azouaou, F.: Modèles et outils d’annotations pour une mémoire personnelle de l’enseignant. Doctoral dissertation, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: Dublin core metadata element set, version 1.1 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.R., Prud’Hommeaux, E., Swick, R.R.: Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. Comput. Netw. 39(5), 589–608 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Kacem, A.H.: Comparative study of web annotation systems used by learners to enhance educational practices: features and services. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. (IJTEL) 8(2), 129–150 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Kacem, A.H.: Functionalities provided by annotation systems for learners in educational context: an overview. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (IJET) 11(2), 4–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Omheni, N., Kacem, A.H.: A new annotation system based on a semantic analysis of learner’s annotative activity to invoke web services. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 9(4), 350–370 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Kacem, A.H.: Annotative activity as a potential source of web service invocation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2013), pp. 288–292. SciTePress (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
    Kalboussi, A., Omheni, N., Mazhoud, O., Kacem, A.H.: An interactive annotation system to support the learner with web services assistance. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2015), pp. 409–410. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Hadj Kacem, A., Omheni, N.: A formal model of learner’s annotations dedicated to web services invocation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2013), pp. 166–169. APSCE (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khalil Chehab
    • 1
  • Anis Kalboussi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ahmed Hadj Kacem
    • 1
  1. 1.ReDCAD Research Laboratory and Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Higher Institute of Computer Science and ManagementUniversity of KairouanKairouanTunisia
  3. 3.ReDCAD Research LaboratoryUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations