Advertisement

Creating Smarter Spaces to Unleash the Potential of Health Apps

  • Jean-Marie BonninEmail author
  • Valérie GayEmail author
  • Frédéric WeisEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10898)

Abstract

Technologies necessary for the development of pervasive health apps with intensive and seamless interactions with their environments are now widely available. Research studies and experimentations have demonstrated the real ability for health apps to interact with their environment. However, designing, testing and ensuring the maintenance and evolution of pervasive health apps remains very complex. In particular, there is a lack of tools to enable developers to design apps that can adapt to increasingly complex and changing environments (sensors added or removed, failures, mobility etc.). This paper reflects our vision to reduce this complexity and is based on our current research work on smart environment and personalized health monitoring apps. It uses SAM, a smart asthma monitoring app as an illustration to highlight the need for a comprehensive set of new interactions to help health app developers interact with the users’ environment, and more specifically get a smarter access to the data. Some requirements can be on the minimum quality level of the data and the way to adapt to the diversity of the sources (data fusion/aggregation), on the network mechanisms used to collect the data (network/link level) and on the collection of the raw data (sensors). It discusses possible solutions to address these needs.

Keywords

Smart space Ubiquitous applications Edge/Fog computing e-Health Chronic disease management Asthma management IoT Context awareness 

References

  1. 1.
    F-interop: Platform for online interoperability and performance test (2016). Accessed 1 Mar 2018. http://www.f-interop.eu/
  2. 2.
    Antignac, T., Le Métayer, D.: Privacy by design: from technologies to architectures. In: Preneel, B., Ikonomou, D. (eds.) APF 2014. LNCS, vol. 8450, pp. 1–17. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06749-0_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, S., Miron-Shatz, T., Schumacher, N., Krocza, J., Diamantidis, C., Albrecht, U.V.: mhealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2(2), May 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calinescu, R., Ghezzi, C., Kwiatkowska, M., Mirandola, R.: Self-adaptive software needs quantitative verification at runtime. Commun. ACM 55(9), 69–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Challa, S., Gulrez, T., Chaczko, Z., Paranesha, T.: A data driven approach for discovering data quality requirements. In: IEEE 8th International Conference on Information Fusion. University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand, December 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, X., Matricardi, P.M.: Allergy and asthma care in the mobile phone era. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol, May 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jayaraman, P.P., Zaslavsky, A., Delsing, J.: On-the-Fly Situation composition within smart spaces. In: Balandin, S., Moltchanov, D., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART -2009. LNCS, vol. 5764, pp. 52–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04190-7_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jayawardene, V., Sadiq, S., Indulska, M.: An Analysis of Data Quality Dimensions. Technical report, The University of Queensland, February 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khaleghi, B., Khamis, A., Karray, F.O., Razavi, S.N.: Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf. Fusion 14(1), 28–44 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandl, K., Mandel, J., Kohane, I.: Driving innovation in health systems through an apps-based information economy. Cell Syst. 1(1), 8–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mun, M., Reddy, S., Shilton, K., Yau, N., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Howard, E., West, R., Boda, P.: PEIR, The personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys 2009, pp. 55–68. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pietropaoli, B., Dominici, M., Weis, F.: Multi-sensor data fusion within the belief functions framework. In: Balandin, S., Koucheryavy, Y., Hu, H. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART -2011. LNCS, vol. 6869, pp. 123–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22875-9_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Xu, L.: Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(5), 637–646 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    TalebiFard, P., Leung, V.C.: A data fusion approach to context-aware service delivery in heterogeneous network environment. In: 2nd International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT-2011), Niagara Falls, Canada, pp. 312–319, September 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Votis, K., Lalos, A., Moustakas, K., Tzovaras, D.: Analysis, modelling and sensing of both physiological and environmental factors for the customized and predictive self-management of asthma. In: 6th Panhellenic Conference of Biomedical Technology. Athens, Greece, May 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMT Atlantique - IRISARennesFrance
  2. 2.University of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia
  3. 3.University Rennes 1 - IRISARennesFrance

Personalised recommendations