Advertisement

How Does Presence of a Human Operator Companion Influence People’s Interaction with a Robot?

  • Yuwei Sun
  • Daniel W. Carruth
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 784)

Abstract

It is increasingly common for people to work alongside robots in a variety of situations. When a robot is completing a task, the human operator of the robot may be present at the work site or operating remotely. It is important to understand how people’s behavior towards a robot is influenced by the presence or absence of the operator. We observed individuals in public locations as they pass by a robot with and without a visible human operator. We show that individuals were more likely to approach and interact with the robot when it was alone. Also, individuals that interacted with the robot when it was alone were more likely to take extra candy from the robot. Our results suggest that robots with visible operators discourage interaction with the robot but encourage honesty in interactions with the robot.

Keywords

Human factors Human-robot interaction Honest behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems at Mississippi State University for providing funds to support the research project. We would also like to thank Christopher Hudson, T.J. Ciufo, Darren Fray, Austin Chambliss, Jennifer Carruth, and the staff at the Colvard Student Union and the Mitchell Memorial Library for their assistance and support during the study.

References

  1. International Federation of Robotics. Service Robots (2017). https://ifr.org/service-robots/
  2. May, D.C., Holler, K.J., Bethel, C.L., Strawderman, L., Carruth, D.W., Usher, J.: Survey of factors for the prediction of human comfort with a non-anthropomorphic robot in public spaces. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9(2), 165–180 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Nomura, T., Sasa, M.: Investigation of differences on impressions of and behaviors toward real and virtual robots between elder people and university students. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2009, pp. 934–939 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209626
  4. Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A.M., Wagner, A.R.: Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 101–108 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451740
  5. Stricker, R., Müller, S., Einhorn, E., Schröter, C., Volkhardt, M., Debes, K., Gross, H.-M.: Konrad and Suse, two robots guiding visitors in a university building. In: Autonomous Mobile Systems, pp. 49–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Kim, R.H., Moon, Y., Choi, J.J., Kwak, S.S.: The effect of robot appearance types on motivating donation. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 210–211 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, G., Forlizzi, J., Ayal, S., Steinfeld, A., Antanitis, J., Hochman, G., Hochendoner, E., Finkenaur, J.: Robot presence and human honesty: experimental evidence. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 181–188 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696487

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Vehicular SystemsStarkvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations