Advertisement

TokenAccess: Improving Accessibility of Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs) by Transferring the Interface and Interaction to Personal Accessible Devices

  • Emre Zaim
  • Klaus Miesenberger
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10896)

Abstract

ATM interaction tends to be restrictive and prescriptive in the way one can interact with. The hardware (screen, keyboard, slot) and most often also the software interfaces are fixed and miss many layers of adaptability for diverse groups of users including those with disabilities. All studies on accessibility and usability underline the difficulty due to often contradictory requirements (what helps one user makes it more complex for another user) making it very hard, cost intensive and almost impossible to reach a satisfactory user experience. Therefore, considerations are vital to investigate the feasibility of transferring the interaction with ATMs as much as possible to a standard HCI and web based system and to runs as much as possible of the interaction on a personal device, which might connect ATs in a well-controlled and accessible environment. The TokenAccess approach is a feasibility study of these considerations. It provides a prototype of a technical infrastructure demonstrating the feasibility of such approach by integrating steps of interaction into already existing services such as e-banking, online check-in or eTicketing. The development of the prototype was done using a user centered design approach involving disabled colleagues and students at the Institute Integriert Studieren at the University of Linz as co-researchers and evaluators. Heuristic Evaluation, Cognitive Walkthrough and observation have been used in each step from requirements engineering towards evaluation.

Keywords

Accessibility ATM Mobile devices 

References

  1. 1.
    Sidel, R.: ATMs fall short on disability rule. Wall Str. J. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204276304577265710282201338. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
  2. 2.
    Blinden- und Sehbehindertenverband Österreich: Barrierefreie Geldausgabe. http://www.blindenverband.at/home/672. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    Tracy, E.: Safer banking tips for disabled people. BBC News Ouch Blog. http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-ouch-31108792. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  4. 4.
    Edison, T.: How blind people use the ATM. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzah0A6IC5o. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  5. 5.
    Noonan, T.: Barriers to using automated teller machines. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/barriers-using-automatic-teller-machines#_Toc474344391. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  6. 6.
    Pous, M.: Enhancing accessibility: mobile to ATM case study. In: 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Consumer eHealth Platforms, Services and Applications (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan, C.C., Wong, A.W., Lee, T.M., Chi, I.: Modified automatic teller machine prototype for older adults: a case study of participative approach to inclusive design. Appl. Ergon. 40, 151–160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zaim, E.: Transferring ATM interface and interaction to mobile devices for enhancing accessibility and usability. Master Thesis (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergman, E., Johnson, E.: Towards accessible human-computer interaction. In: Advances in Human Computer Interaction (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hiroko, A., Hiroyuki, M.: Usability research for the elderly people. Oki Tech. Rev. 71, 54–57 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tarakanov-plax, A.: Design concept for ATM machine, accessible for the elderly users in Israel. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Inclusive Design (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO: ISO 9241.171:2008 Ergonomics of human-system interaction. https://www.iso.org/standard/39080.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    W3C/WAI: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed 25 Mar 2018
  14. 14.
    Madrid, R.I., Schrader, K., Ortega-Moral, M.: Improving the accessibility of public digital terminals through personalisation: comparison of direct and indirect interaction modes. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8513, pp. 258–269. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07437-5_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biswas, P., Halder, A., Maheswary, K., Arjun, S.: Inclusive Personalization of User Interfaces, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 65. Springer, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R., Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Icons: Computer by Martin Vanco, Smartphone by João Luiz, Server by iconsmind.com. http://iconsmind.com. ATM by Luca Trinchero, all from the “Noun Project”, February 2018. https://thenounproject.com/
  18. 18.
    Icons: Computer by Icon Solid, Smartphone by João Luiz, ATM by BomSymbols, all from the “Noun Project”, February 2018. https://thenounproject.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Integriert StudierenJKU LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations