Advertisement

The Health Promoting Potential of Interactive Art

  • Birgitta Cappelen
  • Anders-Petter Andersson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10897)

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for the value of participatory and interactive art, to increase the quality of health and health promoting technology, for children with special needs. UN states through several conventions that everyone has a right to take part in art and cultural experiences, also children and people with disabilities, because art is an important value in our society. With technology, we can make art accessible to people with special needs in completely new ways. By building on the participatory art tradition, in combination with new technology, we can develop new forms of expression and groundbreaking experiences. By incorporating knowledge about health promotion and universal design, we can create new health promoting technology and artistic empowering experiences, by making them more engaging, inspiring and participating for children with special needs. This opportunity has in too little extent, been recognized within Assistive Technology. The paper is based on our research and experience from testing an interactive art installation, with children with special needs at six schools within the Norwegian national school art program.

Keywords

Health promoting technology Art Design for diversity 

References

  1. 1.
    Norwegian Min. Culture: Report No. 8 (2007–08), A Cultural Rucksack, pp. 11–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christensen-Scheel, B.: Mobile Homes. Ph.d. thesis. University of Oslo (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sleinis, F.: Art and Freedom. University of Illinois Press, Chapel Hill (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruud, E.: Music Therapy: A Perspective from the Humanities. Barcelona (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaxter, M.: Health. Polity (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antonovsky, A.: Unraveling the Mystery of Health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    RL Mace Universal Design Inst. http://udinstitute.org/principles.php. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  8. 8.
    Cappelen, B., Andersson, A.: Towards an empowering tangible interaction design for diversity. In: Proceedings Include conference, Royal College of Art, London, Hong Kong (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stensæth, K.: Musical co-creation? Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being 8 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20704
  10. 10.
    Research Council of Norway: RHYME. http://www.rhyme.no. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  11. 11.
    Jøranson, N., et al.: Group activity with Paro in nursing homes. Int. Psychogeriatrics 28(8), 1345–1354 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holbrow, C., et al.: Vocal vibrations. In: Proceedings of NIME 2014, pp. 431–434. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Villafuerte, L., et al.: Acquisition of social abilities through musical tangible user interface. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp. 745–760. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magee, W., et al.: An exploratory study of the use of electronic music technologies in clinical music therapy. Nordic J. Music Ther. 17(2), 124–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cappelen, B., Andersson, A.: Embodied and distributed parallel DJing. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 229, pp. 528–539 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo School of Architecture and DesignOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGjøvikNorway

Personalised recommendations