Advertisement

Using Augmented Reality and Gamification to Empower Rehabilitation Activities and Elderly Persons. A Study Applying Design Thinking

  • Oliver KornEmail author
  • Lea Buchweitz
  • Adrian Rees
  • Gerald Bieber
  • Christian Werner
  • Klaus Hauer
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 787)

Abstract

We present the design of a system combining augmented reality (AR) and gamification to support elderly persons’ rehabilitation activities. The system is attached to the waist; it collects detailed movement data and at the same time augments the user’s path by projections. The projected AR-elements can provide location-based information or incite movement games. The collected data can be observed by therapists. Based on this data, the challenge level can be more frequently adapted, keeping up the patient’s motivation. The exercises can involve cognitive elements (for mild cognitive impairments), physiological elements (rehabilitation), or both. The overall vision is an individualized and gamified therapy. Thus, the system also offers application scenarios beyond rehabilitation in sports. In accordance with the methodology of design thinking, we present a first specification and a design vision based on inputs from business experts, gerontologists, physiologists, psychologists, game designers, cognitive scientists and computer scientists.

Keywords

Augmented reality (AR) Human-centered rehabilitation Personalized rehabilitation Gamification Human factors Human-systems integration 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations: World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siegel, C., Hochgatterer, A., Dorner, T.E.: Contributions of ambient assisted living for health and quality of life in the elderly and care services - a qualitative analysis from the experts’ perspective of care service professionals. BMC Geriatr. 14, 112 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Active and Assisted Living Programme | ICT for ageing well. http://www.aal-europe.eu/. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
  5. 5.
    Alfaro-Acha, A., Al Snih, S., Raji, M.A., Markides, K.S., Ottenbacher, K.J.: Does 8-foot walk time predict cognitive decline in older Mexicans Americans? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 55(2), 245–251 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cesari, M., et al.: Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people–results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53(10), 1675–1680 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montero-Odasso, M., et al.: Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. J. Gerontol. Ser. A: Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 60(10), 1304–1309 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Studenski, S.: Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305(1), 50 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verghese, J., Wang, C., Holtzer, R.: Relationship of clinic-based gait speed measurement to limitations in community-based activities in older adults. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92(5), 844–846 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vanacken, L., et al.: Game-based collaborative training for arm rehabilitation of MS patients: a proof-of-concept game, March 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sousa, M., Vieira, J., Medeiros, D., Arsenio, A., Jorge, J.: SleeveAR: augmented reality for rehabilitation using realtime feedback, pp. 175–185 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UW Design 2016 | TrainARGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Backlund, P., Hendrix, M.: Educational games - are they worth the effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serious games. In: 2013 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pp. 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morelli, T., Foley, J., Folmer, E.: Vi-bowling: a tactile spatial exergame for individuals with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, New York, NY, USA, pp. 179–186 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brach, M., et al.: Modern principles of training in exergames for sedentary seniors: requirements and approaches for sport and exercise sciences, vol. 11 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Korn, O., Tietz, S.: Strategies for playful design when gamifying rehabilitation: a study on user experience. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, New York, NY, USA, pp. 209–214 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNevin, N.H., Wulf, G., Carlson, C.: Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning: implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. 80(4), 373–385 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bassett, S.: The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation, vol. 31 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brumels, K.A., Blasius, T., Cortright, T., Oumedian, D., Solberg, B.: Comparison of efficacy between traditional and video game based balance programs, vol. 62 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin, A.L., Götz, U., Müller, C., Bauer, R.: ‘Gabarello v.1.0’ and ‘Gabarello v.2.0’: development of motivating rehabilitation games for robot-assisted locomotion therapy in childhood. In: Games for Health 2014, pp. 101–104. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Reine, P.P.: The culture of design thinking for innovation. J. Innov. Manag. 5(2), 56–80 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Serrat, O.: “Design Thinking”, in Knowledge Solutions, pp. 129–134. Springer, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McFarlane, D.C., Wilder, S.M.: Interactive dirt: increasing mobile work performance with a wearable projector-camera system. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, New York, NY, USA, pp. 205–214 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou, H., Hu, H.: Human motion tracking for rehabilitation—a survey. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 3(1), 1–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Korn
    • 1
  • Lea Buchweitz
    • 1
  • Adrian Rees
    • 1
  • Gerald Bieber
    • 2
  • Christian Werner
    • 3
  • Klaus Hauer
    • 3
  1. 1.Offenburg UniversityOffenburgGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics ResearchRostockGermany
  3. 3.Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus Heidelberg gGmbHHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations