Advertisement

Increase of Efficiency in the Optical Fiber Area in a Manufacturing Company. A Case Study

  • Arturo Realyvásquez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 793)

Abstract

Efficiency is one of the main parameters manufacturing companies want to improve. Defective products are negatively related to efficiciency. This chapter presents a case study of increase of efficiency in a manufacturing company, specifically in the optical fiber area (OFA). Initially, the OFA had a efficiency of 76.96%, which is unacceptable by the company, since the standard is ≥85%. Then, the objective of this project is to increase the efficiency of the OFA in a percentage within the srandard. To achieve this. The DMAIC method is applied. Results indicate that, once improvements ware implemented, total efficiency of the OFA was 90.17%, which is in the standard of the company. As conclusion, the DMAIC method is a valuable tool to increase the efficiency of manufacturing process. For this, it is recommended to apply this method in different proccess in the OFA.

Keywords

Optical fiber area Efficiency Defective products DMAIC Manufacturing process 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author wants to acknowledge to the company and engineers for allow implement this project. Also, author want to acknowledge to the Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana for allowing the use of its facilities.

References

  1. 1.
    Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E.: An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, K.: The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, 1st edn. (2013). https://doi.org/10.100/978-94-015-7721-2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    López-Roa, Á., García, E., Serrano, C.: Competitividad y eficiencia. Estud. Econ. Apl. 21, 423–450 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Globerman, S.: Foreign direct investment and “spillover” efficiency benefits in canadian manufacturing industries. Can. J. Econ. 12, 42 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/134570Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santos, J., Wysk, R., Torres, J.: Improving Production with Lean Thinking. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey (2014). (214AD)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubey, A., Yadav, S.: Implementation of six sigma DMAIC methodology in precast industry for quality improvement. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 3, 188–196 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, R., Chao, C.C., Cheng, Y.: To improve the measure fail rate on SEM through six sigma DMAIC methodology — Chien-Hui Lu. In: 2017 Joint International Symposium on e-Manufacturing and Design Collaboration & Semiconductor Manufacturing. IEEE, pp. 1–4 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, J.: Aligning Lean Six Sigma DMAIC with Project Management Methodology. The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sahno, J., Shevtshenko, E., Karaulova, T., Tahera, K.: Framework for continuous improvement of production processes. Eng. Econ. 26, 169–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.2.6969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghaleb, A.A., El-Sharief, M.A., El-Sebaie, M.G.: Study of tools, techniques and factors used in lean six sigma. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5, 1652–1658 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rose, K.H.: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)-Fifth Edition. Proj. Manag. J. 44, e1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringInstituto Tecnológico de TijuanaTijuanaMexico

Personalised recommendations