Advertisement

Religion and Traditions of Inquiry

  • Brandon Daniel-Hughes
Chapter

Abstract

Section 5.1 argues that religious traditions are best understood as fallible inhabited experiments and embodied hypotheses. The social and existential security religious communities’ promise is only ever provisional, but they offer a wealth of resources for pursuing further avenues of inquiry within their boundaries and a rich store of semiotic resources for deeply engaging the world. Section 5.2 addresses the efficiency of inquiry and expands upon Peirce ’s treatment of sentiment, commonsense, and instinct. The argument is applicable both to religious and non-religious communities but is particularly relevant when inquiry involves matters of vital importance. Section 5.3 examines religious communities of inquiry, especially enduring, traditional, large-scale religious communities. Venerable religious traditions of inquiry are best understood as deeply invested experimental explorations of the value of engaging the world with a suite of culturally mediated habits and signs. These traditions cultivate and conserve a variety of vague signs, rituals, myths, and habits for engaging the world. The vagueness of the signs, it argues, enables relatively rich inquiry and flexible engagement within a multitude of contexts. Section 5.4 argues that religious traditions also become venerable through developing interpretive habits and signs that encourage correction and reform through disciplines of self-control.

Keywords

Venerable traditions Vagueness Sign networks Fallibilism Indices Ultimate orientation 

References

  1. Agassi, Joseph. 2014. Popper and His Popular Critics: Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend and Imre Lakatos. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel, Karl-Otto. 1981. Charles S. Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism. Trans. John Michael Krois. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, Richard J. 1965. Action, Conduct, and Self-Control. In Perspectives on Peirce, ed. Richard J. Bernstein, 66–91. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, Pascal. 1990. Tradition as Truth and Communication: A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W.M. 1983. The Economy of Peirce’s Abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 19 (4): 397–411.Google Scholar
  7. Daniel-Hughes, Brandon. 2016. Defanging Peirce’s Hopeful Monster: Community, Continuity, and the Risks and Rewards of Inquiry. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 37 (2): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2017. Peirce’s Critical Conservatism and Critical Commonsense: Insights Toward a More Nuanced Theory of Inquiry. Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (1): 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Chardin, Pierre Teilhard. 1961. The Phenomenon of Man. Trans. Julian Huxley. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Ejsing, Anette. 2007. Theology of Anticipation: A Constructive Study of C. S. Peirce. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Forster, Paul D. 1989. Peirce on the Progress and Authority of Science. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 25 (4): 421–452.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lao Tzu. 1963. Tao te Ching. In A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, ed. Wing-tsit Chan, 136–176. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Liszka, James Jakób. 1996. A General Introduction to the Semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McCauley, Robert N. 2011. Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Moltmann, Jürgen. 1993. Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology. Trans. James W. Leitch. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nadin, Mihai. 1980. The Logic of Vagueness and the Category of Synechism. The Monist 63 (3): 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neville, Robert Cummings. 1991. A Theology Primer. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1995. The Truth of Broken Symbols. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2001. Symbols of Jesus: A Christology of Symbolic Engagement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Newman, John Henry Cardinal. 1878/1989. An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ochs, Peter. 1998. Peirce, Pragmatism and the Logic of Scripture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1968. Revelation as History. Trans. David Granskou. London: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  24. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–58. In The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. Arthur W. Burks, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1967. Charles S. Peirce Papers. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Library, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  26. Robin, Richard S. 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sells, Michael A. 1994. Mystical Languages of Unsaying. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Short, Thomas L. 2001. The Conservative Pragmatism of Charles Peirce. Modern Age 43 (4): 295–303.Google Scholar
  29. Slater, Gary. 2015. C. S. Peirce and the Nested Continua Model of Religious Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stewart, Christopher W. 1991. Social and Economic Aspects of Peirce’s Conception of Science. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 27 (4): 501–526.Google Scholar
  31. Vannatta, Seth. 2013. The Inner and Outer Voices of Conservative Pragmatism: C.S. Peirce and Michael Oakeshott. Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1): 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2014. Conservatism and Pragmatism in Law, Politics, and Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Weissman, David. 1987. Intuition and Ideality. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1989. Hypothesis and the Spiral of Reflection. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wildman, Wesley. 2010. Religious Philosophy as Multidisciplinary Comparative Inquiry: Envisioning a Future for the Philosophy of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon Daniel-Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.John Abbott CollegeSainte-Anne-De-BellevueCanada

Personalised recommendations