Advertisement

An Inventory of Proglacial Systems in Austria, Switzerland and Across Patagonia

  • Jonathan CarrivickEmail author
  • Tobias Heckmann
  • Mauro Fischer
  • Bethan Davies
Chapter
Part of the Geography of the Physical Environment book series (GEOPHY)

Abstract

Deglaciation since the Little Ice Age has exposed only a small areal proportion of alpine catchments, but these proglacial systems are disproportionately important as sediment sources. Indeed sediment yields from proglacial rivers are amongst the highest measured anywhere in the World. Motivated by a desire to understand where exactly within catchments this sediment is coming from and how it might evolve, this chapter presents the first digital inventories of proglacial systems and the first comparative inter- and intra-catchment comparison of their geometry, topography and geomorphology. Whilst focussing on the description of these inventories and on descriptive statistics, it highlights the potential of these data, with examples from Austria, Switzerland and Patagonia, for interpreting landscape evolution status, predominant earth surface processes and glacial meltwater inundation patterns. Switzerland has by far the highest proportion of very small (<0.5 km2) proglacial systems. Patagonia has the most even distribution of proglacial systems in terms of areal size and elevation above sea level. We found no east–west or north–south spatial pattern in geometric or topographical metrics, such as hypsometric index, thereby refuting a straightforward control of climate-driven precipitation or air temperature. However, we note that geology, particularly rock hardness, could be a major factor in proglacial system character. Likely sediment sinks can occupy up to ~30 and 20% of proglacial systems in Austria and Switzerland, respectively, but up to 90% of those in Patagonia where many systems terminate on a coastline. Meltwater influence maps and landform maps, derived from contributing area and slope data, respectively, will not only be useful for many environmental science disciplines but also for water resources, landscape managers and natural hazards authorities. Overall, this chapter presents an objective and easily implemented method for making proglacial systems inventories and for characterising inter- and intra-catchment geomorphological form and function.

Keywords

Little Ice Age Deglaciation Proglacial areas Geomorphometry Glacier inventory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Andrea Fischer is thanked for pointing us towards the sources of Austria glacier outline and DEM data. Oliver Korup provided a critical yet constructive review, and Editor David Morche is thanked for his assistance.

References

  1. Ballantyne CK (2002) Paraglacial geomorphology. Quat Sci Rev 21:1935–2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00005-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann S, Winkler S, Andreassen LM (2009) Mapping glaciers in Jotunheimen, South-Norway, during the “Little Ice Age” maximum. Cryosphere 3:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-3-231-2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beylich AA, Lamoureux SF, Decaulne A, Dixon JC, Orwin JF, Otto JC, Overeem I, Saemundsson T, Warburton J, Zwolinski Z (2010) Sedimentary fluxes and budgets in changing cold environments: the global IAG/AIG sediment budgets in cold environments (SEDIBUD) programme. Geografiska Annaler: Ser A, Phys Geogr 92:151–153.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00386.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop M, Shroder JF, Bonk R, Olsenholler J (2002) Geomorphic change in high mountains: a western Himalayan perspective. Global Planet Change 32:311–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00073-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosson J-B, Deline P, Bodin X, Schoeneich P, Baron L, Gardent M, Lambiel C (2015) The influence of ground ice distribution on geomorphic dynamics since the Little Ice Age in proglacial areas of two cirque glacier systems. Earth Surf Process Land 40:666–680.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson ML, Flagstad LA, Gillet F, Mitchell EAD (2010) Community development along a proglacial chronosequence: are above-ground and below-ground community structure controlled more by biotic than abiotic factors? Above- and below-ground communities in succession. J Ecol 98:1084–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01699.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrivick JL, Heckmann T (2017) Short-term geomorphological evolution of proglacial systems. Geomorphology 287:3–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrivick JL, Rushmer EL (2009) Inter- and intra-catchment variations in proglacial geomorphology: an example from Franz Josef Glacier and Fox Glacier, New Zealand. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41:18–36.  https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246(07-099)%5bCARRIVICK%5d2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrivick JL, Tweed FS (2013) Proglacial lakes: character, behaviour and geological importance. Quat Sci Rev 78:34–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrivick JL, Tweed FS (2016) A global assessment of the societal impacts of glacier outburst floods. Global Planet Change 144:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrivick JL, Geilhausen M, Warburton J, Dickson NE, Carver SJ, Evans AJ, Brown LE (2013) Contemporary geomorphological activity throughout the proglacial area of an alpine catchment. Geomorphology 188:83–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrivick JL, Berry K, Geilhausen M et al (2015a) Decadal-Scale Changes of the Ödenwinkelkees, Central Austria, Suggest Increasing Control of Topography and Evolution Towards Steady State. Geografiska Annaler: Ser A, Phys Geogr 97:543–562.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrivick JL, Smith MW, Carrivick DM (2015b) Terrestrial laser scanning to deliver high-resolution topography of the upper Tarfala valley, arctic Sweden. GFF 137:383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2015.1037569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavalli M, Trevisani S, Comiti F, Marchi L (2013) Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments. Geomorphology 188:31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Church M, Ryder JM (1972) Paraglacial sedimentation: a consideration of fluvial processes conditioned by glaciation. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:3059.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1972)83%5b3059:PSACOF%5d2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clubb FJ, Mudd SM, Milodowski DT, Valters DA, Slater LJ, Hurst MD, Limaye AB (2017) Geomorphometric delineation of floodplains and terraces from objectively defined topographic thresholds. Earth Surf Dyn 5:369–385.  https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D’Amico ME, Freppaz M, Filippa G, Zanini E (2014) Vegetation influence on soil formation rate in a proglacial chronosequence (Lys Glacier, NW Italian Alps). CATENA 113:122–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daten Österreichs (2016) Digitales Geländemodell (DGM) Österreich. https://www.data.gv.at/katalog/dataset/b5de6975-417b-4320-afdb-eb2a9e2a1dbf. Last visited Mar, 2016
  19. Davies BJ, Glasser NF (2012) Accelerating shrinkage of Patagonian glaciers from the Little Ice Age (∼AD 1870) to 2011. J Glaciol 58:1063–1084.  https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG12J026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egli M, Wernli M, Kneisel C, Haeberli W (2006) Melting glaciers and soil development in the proglacial area morteratsch (Swiss Alps): I. soil type chronosequence. Arct Antarct Alp Res 38:499–509.  https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2006)38%5b499:MGASDI%5d2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer M, Huss M, Barboux C, Hoelzle M (2014) The New Swiss Glacier Inventory SGI2010: relevance of using high-resolution source data in areas dominated by very small glaciers. Arct Antarct Alp Res 46:933–945.  https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.4.933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer A, Seiser B, Stocker Waldhuber M, Mitterer C, Abermann J (2015a) Tracing glacier changes in Austria from the Little Ice Age to the present using a lidar-based high-resolution glacier inventory in Austria. Cryosphere 9:753–766.  https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-753-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer M, Huss M, Hoelzle M (2015b) Surface elevation and mass changes of all Swiss glaciers 1980–2010. Cryosphere 9:525–540.  https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-525-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer A, Seiser B, Stocker-Waldhuber M, Abermann J (2015c) The Austrian Glacier Inventory GI 3, 2006. In: ArcGIS (shapefile) format.  https://doi.org/10.1594/pangaea.844985
  25. Fryirs KA, Wheaton JM, Brierley GJ (2016) An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes: measuring confinement along fluvial corridors. Earth Surf Proc Land 41:701–710.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geilhausen M, Otto J-C, Schrott L (2012) Spatial distribution of sediment storage types in two glacier landsystems (Pasterze & Obersulzbachkees, Hohe Tauern, Austria). J Maps 8:242–259.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2012.708540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glasser NF, Harrison S, Jansson KN (2009) Topographic controls on glacier sediment–landform associations around the temperate North Patagonian Icefield. Quat Sci Rev 28:2817–2832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.07.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groß G, Patzelt G (2015) The Austrian Glacier inventory for the Little Ice Age maximum (GI LIA) in ArcGIS (shapefile) format.  https://doi.org/10.1594/pangaea.844987
  29. Hallet B, Hunter L, Bogen J (1996) Rates of erosion and sediment evacuation by glaciers: a review of field data and their implications. Global Planet Change 12:213–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8181(95)00021-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heckmann T, McColl S, Morche D (2016) Retreating ice: research in pro-glacial areas matters: research in pro-glacial areas. Earth Surf Proc Land 41:271–276.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaeger JM, Koppes MN (2016) The role of the cryosphere in source-to-sink systems. Earth Sci Rev 153:43–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiskoot H, Curran CJ, Tessler DL, Shenton LR (2009) Changes in Clemenceau Icefield and Chaba Group glaciers, Canada, related to hypsometry, tributary detachment, length–slope and area–aspect relations. Ann Glaciol 50:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.3189/172756410790595796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kjær KH, Korsgaard NJ, Schomacker A (2008) Impact of multiple glacier surges—a geomorphological map from Brúarjökull, East Iceland. J Maps 4:5–20.  https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2008.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knoll C, Kerschner H, Heller A, Rastner P (2009) A GIS-based Reconstruction of Little Ice Age Glacier maximum extents for South Tyrol, Italy: reconstruction of Little Ice Age Glacier maximum extents. Trans GIS 13:449–463.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01173.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambiel C, Maillard B, Kummert M, Reynard E (2016) Geomorphology of the Hérens valley (Swiss Alps). J Maps 12:160–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.999135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lane SN, Bakker M, Gabbud C, Micheletti N, Saugy JN (2017) Sediment export, transient landscape response and catchment-scale connectivity following rapid climate warming and Alpine glacier recession. Geomorphology 277:210–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loye A, Jaboyedoff M, Pedrazzini A (2009) Identification of potential rockfall source areas at a regional scale using a DEM-based geomorphometric analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1643–1653.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1643-2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucchesi S, Fioraso G, Bertotto S, Chiarle M (2014) Little Ice Age and contemporary glacier extent in the Western and South-Western Piedmont Alps (North-Western Italy). J Maps 10:409–423.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.880226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maisch M, Haeberli W, Hoelzle M, Wenzel J (1999) Occurrence of rocky and sedimentary glacier beds in the Swiss Alps as estimated from glacier-inventory data. Ann Glaciol 28:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.3189/172756499781821779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Micheletti N, Lane SN (2016) Water yield and sediment export in small, partially glaciated Alpine watersheds in a warming climate. Water Resour Res 52:4924–4943.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Micheletti N, Lambiel C, Lane SN (2015) Investigating decadal-scale geomorphic dynamics in an alpine mountain setting. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 120:2155–2175.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schiefer E, Gilbert R (2007) Reconstructing morphometric change in a proglacial landscape using historical aerial photography and automated DEM generation. Geomorphology 88:167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shiyin L, Wenxin S, Yongping S, Gang L (2003) Glacier changes since the Little Ice Age maximum in the western Qilian Shan, Northwest China, and consequences of glacier runoff for water supply. J Glaciol 49:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.3189/172756503781830926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith MJ, Rose J, Booth S (2006) Geomorphological mapping of glacial landforms from remotely sensed data: an evaluation of the principal data sources and an assessment of their quality. Geomorphology 76:148–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith MW, Carrivick JL, Quincey DJ (2016) Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography. Prog Phys Geogr 40:247–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315615805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solomon S (ed) (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Zanoner T, Carton A, Seppi R et al (2017) Little Ice Age mapping as a tool for identifying hazard in the paraglacial environment: the case study of Trentino (Eastern Italian Alps). Geomorphology 295:551–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Carrivick
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tobias Heckmann
    • 2
  • Mauro Fischer
    • 3
  • Bethan Davies
    • 4
  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Physical GeographyCatholic University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtEichstättGermany
  3. 3.Unit of GeographyUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  4. 4.Centre for Quaternary Research, Department of Geography, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations