Advertisement

The Ethics of Uterus Transplantation: Moral Challenges and Recommendations for Progress

  • Arthur L. Caplan
  • Brendan Parent
  • Pasquale PatrizioEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Uterus transplants, a form of vascularized composite allograft, have so far, up until January 2019, resulted in eight successful live births in Sweden and additionally two births in the USA, one birth in Brazil, one birth in Serbia/Italy, one birth in India, and one birth in China. Moreover, there are several ongoing pregnancies with expected deliveries in 2019. In the USA, initial attempts resulted in failures. One case in Cleveland and three out of four transplants in Dallas resulted in uterus removal due to complications. The ethical concerns regarding whether the pursuit of a pregnancy justifies the risks involved with the surgery must now be updated to acknowledge the successes and failures of these first attempts. Similarly, concerns regarding how the practice should ethically be pursued must now be characterized. These include how to ensure adequate qualifications of transplant teams, designing research trials and patient selection criteria to protect recipients, selecting informed and voluntarily consenting living and cadaveric donors, defining adequate metrics for a “successful” uterine transplant, ensuring a strategy for managing failure, and ensuring equal access for potential recipients.

Abbreviations

AUFI

Absolute uterine factor infertility

IRB

Institutional review board

ISUTx

International Society of Uterus Transplantation

IVF

In vitro fertilization

UTx

Uterus transplantation

VCA

Vascularized composite allograft

References

  1. Allen-West C. Level of oxytocin in pregnant women predicts mother-child bond. Association for Psychological Science; 2007. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/level-of-oxytocin-in-pregnant-women-predicts-mother-child-bond.html.
  2. Bayefsky MJ, Berkman BE. The ethics of allocating uterine transplants. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016;25(3):350–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baylor Scott & White Health. Uterine transplant clinical trial update—October 5, 2016. Baylor Scott & White Health; 2016. http://news.bswhealth.com/releases/uterine-transplant-clinical-trial-oct-5-2016.
  4. Brännström M. Womb transplants with live births: an update and the future. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017;17(9):1105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnstromet N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brännström M, Bokström H, Dham-Khaler P, Diaz-Garcia C, Ekberg J, Enskog A, et al. One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caplan A, Perry C, Plante LA, Saloma J, Batzer FR. Moving the womb. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007;37:18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catsanos R, Rogers W, Lotz M. The ethics of uterus transplantation. Bioethics. 2013;27(2):65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Covington SN, Patrizio P. Gestational carriers and surrogacy. In: Sauer MV, editor. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. London: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falcone T, Farrell R, Flyckt R. The future of human uterine transplantation: can minimally invasive techniques provide a uterus suitable for transplant? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):243–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glionna J. Twins rejected, surrogate birth mother sues. 2001. http://articles.latimes.com/2001/aug/11/local/me-33076.
  12. Golombok S, Murray C, Jadva V, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Rust J. Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent–child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1918–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grady D. Uterus transplants may soon help some infertile women in the US become pregnant. NY Times. 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/13/health/uterus-transplants-may-soon-help-some-infertile-women-in-the-us-become-pregnant.html?_r=1.
  14. Grady D. Yeast infection led to removal of transplanted uterus. NY Times. 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/09/health/yeast-infectionled-to-removal-of-transplanted-uterus.html?_r=2.
  15. In re Baby M, 537 A.2d 1227, 109 N.J. 396 (N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
  16. In re Marriage of Buzzanca, 61 Cal. App. 4th 1410 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1998).Google Scholar
  17. Lewin T. Surrogates and couples face a maze of laws, state by state. NY Times. 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/us/surrogates-and-couples-face-a-maze-of-laws-state-bystate.html?_r=0.
  18. Mumtaz Z. Ethics criteria for uterine transplants: relevance for low-income, pronatalistic societies? J Clin Res Bioethics. 2012;S:1–5.Google Scholar
  19. Nair A, Stega J, Richard Smith J, Del Priore G. Uterus transplant; evidence and ethics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1127:83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman S. Why more people don’t adopt. Psychol Today. 2008. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/singletons/200810/why-more-people-don-t-adopt.
  21. Orentlicher D. Toward acceptance of uterus transplants. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(6):12–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. VCAs from living donors. 2015. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/resources/by-organ/vascular-composite-allograft/vcas-from-living-donors/.
  23. Parent B. Informing donors about hand and face transplants: time to update the uniform anatomical gift act. J Health Biomed Law. 2014;10:309–26.Google Scholar
  24. Petrini C, Gainotti S, Morresi A, Nanni Costa A. Ethical issues in uterine transplantation: psychological implications and informed consent. Transplant Proc. 2017;49:707–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saul S. New Jersey judge calls surrogate legal mother of twins. NY Times. 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/us/31surrogate.html.
  26. Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Pinborg A, Aittomäki K, Romundstad LB, et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;22(2):260–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tribune News Service. Cleveland clinic says first uterus transplant in U.S. fails. Chicago Tribune. 2016. http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/ct-uterus-transplant-fails-20160314-story.html.
  28. Wei L, Xue T, Tao K-S, Zhang G, Zhao G-Y, Yu S-Q. Modified human uterus transplantation using ovarian veins for venous drainage: the first report of surgically successful robotic-assisted uterus procurement and follow-up for 12 months. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woessner J, Blake V, Arora K. Ethical considerations in uterus transplantation. Theor Med Bioeth. 2015;5:81–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur L. Caplan
    • 1
  • Brendan Parent
    • 1
  • Pasquale Patrizio
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Medical EthicsNYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Yale School of Medicine, Yale Fertility Center and Yale Center for BioethicsNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations