Advertisement

Management of and Quality Control in the Pulmonary Function Laboratory

  • Susan Blonshine
  • Jeffrey Haynes
  • Katrina Hynes
Chapter
Part of the Respiratory Medicine book series (RM)

Abstract

Management of the pulmonary function laboratory (PFL) encompasses multiple components that directly impact the integrity of the data. Interpretation and application of the results are dependent on quality systems that begin with qualified personnel that have received adequate training and oversight. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) acceptability and repeatability standards for pulmonary function testing (PFT) must be understood by the medical director and staff to achieve the desired results. Management of the equipment, scheduling procedures, documents, and regulatory compliance are also required of a well-managed PFL system. Each of these components is included in the ATS assessment checklist for accreditation of PFLs and is required for laboratory accreditation.

Keywords

Personnel requirements Quality control Accreditation Standard operating procedures Path of workflow Test sequencing Troubleshooting 

Selected References

  1. American Thoracic Society pulmonary function laboratory management and procedure manual. 3rd ed: American Thoracic Society; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Blonshine S, Mottram CD, Berte LM, et al. Application of a quality management system model for respiratory services: approved guidelines. In: CLSI document HS4-A2. 2nd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Blonshine S. Integrating education with diagnostics, patient and technologist. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1997;3(2):139–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg BM, Hartley MF, Bailey MJ, Thompson BR. Adherence to acceptability and repeatability criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories. Respir Care. 2012;57(12):2032–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. CLIA Personnel Policies for Individuals Directing or Performing Non-waived Tests.www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Downloads/PSV-FAQs.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
  6. Culver BH, Graham BL, Coates AL, Wanger J, Berry CE, Clarke PK, Hallstrand TS, Hankinson JL, Kaminsky DA, MacIntyre NR, McCormack MC, Rosenfeld M, Stanojevic S, Weiner DJ. ATS Committee on proficiency standards for pulmonary function laboratories. Recommendations for a standardized pulmonary function report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1463–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, Irvin CG, Leigh MW, Lundberg JO, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):602–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham BL, Brusasco VB, Burgos F, Cooper BG, Jensen R, Kendrick A, et al. ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(1):2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haynes JM, Sweeney EL. The effect of telephone appointment-reminder calls on outpatient absenteeism in a pulmonary function laboratory. Respir Care. 2006;51(1):36–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Haynes JM. Quality assurance of the pulmonary function technologist. Respir Care. 2012;57(1):114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey D, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:1428–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HS4-A2. Application of a quality system model for respiratory services, approved guideline. Wayne: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen R, Leyk M, Crapo R, Muchmore D, Berclaz PY. Quality control of DLCO instruments in global clinical trials. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(4):828–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkby J, Aurora P, Spencer H, Rees S, Sonnappa S, Stocks J. Stitching and switching: the impact of discontinuous lung function reference equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;39(5):1256–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005a;26(1):153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005b;26(1):153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Cassaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005c;26(2):319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mottram CD. Pulmonary function testing equipment. In: Mottram CD, editor. Ruppel’s manual of pulmonary function testing. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018. p. 363–414.Google Scholar
  19. Oostveen E, MacLeod D, Lorino H, Farré R, Hantos Z, Desager K, Marchal F. ERS task force on respiratory impedance measurements. The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(6):1026–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Patout M, Sesé L, Gille T, Coiffard B, Korzeniewski S, Lhuillier E, et al. Does training respiratory physicians in clinical respiratory physiology and interpretation of pulmonary function testing improve core knowledge? Thorax. 2018;73:78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porszasz J, Blonshine S, Cao R, Paden HA, Casaburi R, Rossiter HB. Biological quality control for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multicenter clinical trials. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Eur Respir J. 1993;6 Suppl 16:5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quality management system: a model for laboratory services, Approved guideline. CLSI document 4. Wayne: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
  24. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1324–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, Pedersen OF, Brusasco V, Burgos F, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(3):511–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zavorsky GS, Hsia CC, Hughes JM, Borland CD, Guénard H, van der Lee I, et al. Standardisation and application of the single-breath determination of nitric oxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(2):1600962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Blonshine
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Haynes
    • 2
  • Katrina Hynes
    • 3
  1. 1.TechEd Consultants, Inc.MasonUSA
  2. 2.Pulmonary Function LaboratorySt. Joseph HospitalNashuaUSA
  3. 3.Pulmonary Function LaboratoryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations