Advertisement

Landscape Lab pp 159-186 | Cite as

Landscape and Modern City: Requalification of the Perugia Railway Station District

  • Fabio Bianconi
  • Marco Filippucci
Chapter
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 20)

Abstract

The interpretation of landscape, in the figurative process, comes into crisis in places characterized by an absence of definition, of boundary, of identity – the conditions of our suburban districts. “Urban landscape”, “rural landscape”, or “natural landscape” exist: no one thinks about a “suburban landscape” because these spaces are often “Characters in Search of an Author”, a condensed center of disjointedness, where anthropization has too many times decreased natural and environmental values. Rethinking and redrawing landscape means reinterpreting places and confronting the urban question as landscape topics aim to generate links of reconstruction between community and city. The applicative results of research in this topic starts from the national call for suburban boundaries requalification, for which Perugia Municipality has sealed an agreement with the group of researchers representing the University of Perugia to study the image of the next district, Fontivegge, around the railway station. The project developed aims to stop the deterioration of this central part of Perugia, intervening in a saturated urban landscape through new signs targeting the citizen in the recovering of public spaces and for the construction of a smart city. The proposal acts in a multitasking strategy of redrawing parks, urban mobility, and spatial reconnection, and funds were awarded (16 million euros) for work that is coming soon. According to the smart city principle of “doing more with less,” the proposal is developed with zero-volume architecture rethinking the visual. The proposal results in application of the Lynchian theory of the image of the city in the centrality of perception, in a research approach based on a human–environmental relationship. Building with nature, this concept valorizes the main ecological basins of the area with a process of improvement in user services, space quality, and ecological and environmental value. The draft increases the existing vegetation, especially with the use of edible plants, and it involves the construction of urban gardens for the local community to generate the re-appropriation of spaces by the community itself valorizing the perceptual senses. The idea is to create a public space that can promote the urban vitality of the entire district, by becoming the attractor for the community, and it becomes a district safety supervision. The aim of the project is to retrieve the urban space, in the new relationship between man and the environment, redrawing the urban landscape for a new image of the city. However, the proposal launches more questions than answers, asking how is it possible to reappropriate the hold of public space. The hope is that it can generate a dispute about solutions, involving citizens to co-design their place and revaluing their urban landscape according to a common good value. The approach in representation topic is central to connecting the analysis developed through an urban survey with the project, according to the study of architecture in a contemporary approach for the sustainability of the spaces.

Keywords

Suburban Image of the city Project Requalification Perception 

References

  1. Ahvenniemi H, Huovila A, Pinto-Seppä I, Airaksinen M (2016) What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? City 60Google Scholar
  2. Alexander C (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander C (1965) A city is not a tree. Arch Forum 172Google Scholar
  4. Ancona L (1972) Perception dynamics, scientific and technical. Mondadori, MilanGoogle Scholar
  5. Appleyard D, Lynch K, Myer JR (1964) The view from the road. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnheim R (1954) Art and visual perception. A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnheim R (1977) The dynamics of architectural form. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  8. Barthes R (1967) Semiology and urban planning. Op. Cit. 9Google Scholar
  9. Bassoli M, Polizzi E (eds) (2011) La Governance del territorio. Partecipazione e rappresentanza della società civile nelle politiche. FrancoAngeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauman Z (2013) Does the richness of the few benefit us all? Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Benjamin W (1968) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Arendt H (ed) Illuminations. Harcourt, Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergoglio JM (2013) Guarire dalla corruzione. EMI, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  13. Bettencourt L, West GB (2011) Bigger cities do more with less. Scientific Am 305(3):52–53Google Scholar
  14. Bianconi F (2008) Nuovi paesaggi. Morlacchi, PerugiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Boeri S, Lanzardi A, Marini E (1992) Nuovi spazi senza nome. Casabella:597–598Google Scholar
  16. Bohn K, Viljoen A (2009) The edible city: envisioning the Continuous Productive Urban Landscape (CPUL). Open House International 34Google Scholar
  17. Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M (2005) Protected landscapes: a conservation approach that links nature, culture and community. In: Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M (eds) The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. International Union for Conservation of Nature, GlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chourabi H et al (2012) Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework, in System Science (HICSS). 45th Hawaii international conference, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Clément G (2004) Manifeste du Tiers paysage. Éditions Sujet/Objet, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Clemente M (2015) Liveliness and livability of urban space. Perception of well-being and public space design. In Gospodini A (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on changing cities II spatial design, Landscape & Socio-Economic Dimensions, Grafima, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  21. Cocchia A (2014) Smart and digital city: a systematic literature review. In: Dameri RP, Rosenthal-Sabroux C (eds) Smart city. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  22. Couclelis H (2004) The construction of the digital city. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 1Google Scholar
  23. Creasy R (2010) Edible landscaping. Sierra Club Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. De Fiore G (2005) Appunti di Viaggio. In: Volta V (ed) Immagine della città europea. Tamellini, LegnagoGoogle Scholar
  25. de Rubertis R (2002) La città rimossa. Officina, RomaGoogle Scholar
  26. de Rubertis R, Soletti A (eds) (2000) De Vulgari Architectura. Indagine sui luoghi urbani irrisolti, Officina, RomaGoogle Scholar
  27. Diderot D, D’Alembert JR (1751–1757) Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des metiers, Le Breton for Briasson, David the elder, Le Breton and Durand, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Duchamp M, Sanouillet M, Peterson E (1973) The writings of Marcel Duchamp. Da Capo Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Eliade M (1948) Traite d’histoire des religions. Payot, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Ergazakis K, Metaxiotis K, Psarras J ((2004)) Towards knowledge cities: conceptual analysis and success stories J Knowl Manage 8(5):5–15Google Scholar
  31. Ewing R, Handy S (2009) Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. J Urban Des 14:65–84Google Scholar
  32. Farina A (2000) The cultural landscape as a model for the integration of ecology and economics. Bioscience 50:313–320Google Scholar
  33. Farinelli F (2008) Per la genealogia del territorio moderno. In Blanco L (ed) Organizzazione del potere e territorio. Contributi per una lettura storica della spazialità, FrancoAngeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  34. Feyles M (2012) Studi per la fenomenologia della memoria. FrancoAngeli, RomaGoogle Scholar
  35. Filippucci M (2018) Dalla forma urbana all’immagine della città. Percezione e figurazione all'origine dello spazio costruito. tesi di Dottorato, Sapienza Università di Roma, Dottorato in Scienze della Rappresentazione e del rilievo, XXIV ciclo (2012), in0805/1506Google Scholar
  36. Filippucci M, Feyles M (2012) Scrittura/disegno. Riduzione, tecnica, interpretazione. In: Belardi P et al (eds) Trascrizioni. Idee per la rappresentazione, Artegrafica Pls, RomaGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobbes T (1651) Leviathan, or the matter, form and power of a common wealth ecclesiastical and civil. In: Crooke A (ed) Green Dragon in St. Pauls Churchyard, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Hollands RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Italy DPCM no.127/2016 Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri. Approvazione del bando con il quale sono definiti le modalità e la procedura di presentazione dei progetti per la riqualificazione urbana e la sicurezza delle periferie delle città metropolitane, dei comuni capoluogo di provincia e della città di AostaGoogle Scholar
  40. Jencks C, Braid G (eds) (1969) Meaning in architecture. Barric and Rockliffe, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Jelin E (2000) Towards a global environmental citizenship? Citizenship Studies 4(1):47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Katz D (1944) Gestaltpsychologie. Benno Schwabe, BaselGoogle Scholar
  43. Kepes G (1944) Language of vision. Paul Theobald, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Klee P (1956) Das Denken bildnerische. Benno Schwabe & Co., BaselGoogle Scholar
  45. Leake JR, Bradford AA, Rigby JE (2009) Health benefits of ‘grow your own’ food in urban areas: implications for contaminated land risk assessment and risk management? Environ Health 8(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. Harvard-MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies Series, BostonGoogle Scholar
  47. Lynch K (1981) Good City form. Harvard-MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies Series, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. Gingko Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  49. Norberg-Schulz C (1980) Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Academy Editions Ltd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD (2012) OECD environmental outlook to 2050. The consequences of inaction. OCD Publ, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orwell G (1945) Animal Farm. Secker and Wardburg, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petranzan M, Neri G, Purini F (2005) La città uguale. Scritti scelti sulla città e il progetto urbano dal 1966 al 2004. il Poligrafo, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  54. Purini F (1990) Inventiamo le città. Ricostruire pensando all’uomo. La Repubblica 19 settembreGoogle Scholar
  55. Purini F (1992a) Corpi ambientali virtuali. Casabella:597–598Google Scholar
  56. Purini F (1992b) Dodici frammenti per disegnare il disegno…lettera romana a Margherita De Simone, Palermo: le parole e i segni. In: Moschini F, Neri G (eds) Dal Progetto. Scritti teorici di Franco Purini, Kappa, RomaGoogle Scholar
  57. Purini F (1992c) Spazi e Parole. In: Moschini F, Neri G (eds) Dal Progetto. Scritti teorici di Franco Purini, Kappa, RomaGoogle Scholar
  58. Purini F (1996) Costruire la demolizione. In: Criconia A (ed) Figure della demolizione. Costa & Nolan, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  59. Raban J (1996) Bad land: an American romance. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Riegl A (1985) Il culto moderno dei monumenti. Nuova Alpha, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  61. Righi PV, Marchi G, Dondi G (1986) Stabilization through drainage wells of a landslide in the city of Perugia, in Acts the XVI National Conference Geotechnics, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  62. Saint Augustine De Civitate Dei (426)Google Scholar
  63. Schuler D (2001) Digital cities and digital citizens. Comput Sociol Approaches IIGoogle Scholar
  64. Settis S (2005) Battaglie senza eroi. I beni culturali tra istituzioni e profitto. Mondadori Electa, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  65. Settis S (2012) Paesaggio Costituzione cemento. La battaglia per l'ambiente contro il degrado civile. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  66. Settis S (2014) Azione popolare. Cittadini per il bene comune. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  67. Settis S (2017) Architettura e democrazia. Paesaggio, città, diritti civili. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  68. Stiglitz JE (2015) Il prezzo della disuguaglianza. Come la società divisa di oggi minaccia il nostro futuro. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  69. Stimmel CL (2015) Building smart cities: analytics, ICT, and design thinking. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turri E (1979) Semiologia del paesaggio italiano. Longanesi, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  71. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, and United Nations, Department of Economic (2015) A world urbanization prospects the 2014 revision. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Wall RS, Stavropoulos S (2016) Smart cities within world city networks. Appl Econ Lett 23(12):875–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zevi B (1948) Saper vedere l’architettura. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang J, Sui YH (2012) Selection and design of ornamental plants for low-carbon urban landscape: a review. Appl Mech Mater 174/177(3):2314–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Bianconi
    • 1
  • Marco Filippucci
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Study of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations