Advertisement

Rhetorical-Performative Analysis of the Urban Symbolic Landscape: Populism in Action

  • Emilia Palonen
Chapter
Part of the Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse book series (PSDS)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a rhetorical-performative analysis as a tool for exploring urban symbolic landscape and populism and hence deals with relationality and materiality from the postfoundational perspective. It connects the articulation theory of cultural theorists Stuart Hall or political theorists Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and spatial analysis of cultural geographer Doreen Massey to the study of populism. The case of Hungary shows how political frontiers have been articulated in the public space, contestable interpretations of the past are deliberately used and key symbolic urban landscapes transformed radically to articulate a political ‘us’—and ‘them.’ In the 2010s, in the Hungarian capital Budapest, the top-down process transforming urban space faced bottom-up movements which reproduce the populist logic of articulation.

Keywords

Hungary Populism Ernesto Laclau Cultural politics Urban culture 

References

A

  1. Akçalı, E., & Korkut, U. (2015). Urban Transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal Governmentality in the EU’s Semi-Periphery and Its Limits. Political Geography, 46, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2006 [1983, 1985, 1991]). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Azaryahu, M. (1996). The Power of Commemorative Street Names. Environment and Planning D, 14(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B

  1. Bátory, A. (2016). Populists in Government? Hungary’s System of National Cooperation. Democratization, 23(2), 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg, L. D. (2011). Banal Naming, Neoliberalism, and Landscapes of Dispossession. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 10(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bodnár, J. (2000). Fin de Millenaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of Urban Life. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bozóki, A. (2015). Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In P. Krasztev & J. Van Til (Eds.), The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy (pp. 3–36). Budapest/New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Žižek, S. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London: Verso.Google Scholar

D

  1. Dányi, E. (2015). Democracy in Ruins: The Case of Hungarian Parliament. In D. Gafijczuk & D. Sayer (Eds.), The Inhabited Ruins of Central Europe (pp. 55–78). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. De Man, P. (1978). The Epistemology of Metaphor. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLuca, K. (1999). Articulation Theory: A Discursive Grounding for Rhetorical Practice. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 32(4), 334–348.Google Scholar
  4. Dikeç, M. (2005). Space, Politics, and the Political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

F

  1. Finlayson, A. (2007). From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(4), 545–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G

  1. Gillis, J. R. (Ed.). (1994). Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

H

  1. Hall, S. (1986). The Problem of Ideology-Marxism Without Guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hall, S. (1993). What Is This “Black” in Black Popular Culture? Social Justice, 20(51/52), 104–114.Google Scholar
  3. Hirschberger, G., Kende, A., & Weinstein, S. (2016). Defensive Representations of an Uncomfortable History: The Case of Hungary and the Holocaust. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Howarth, D. (1996). Reflections on the Politics of Space and Time. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 1(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

K

  1. Kolamo, S., & Vuolteenaho, J. (2013). The Interplay of Mediascapes and Cityscapes in a Sports Mega-Event: The Power Dynamics of Place Branding in the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa. International Communication Gazette, 75(5–6), 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

L

  1. Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What’s in a Name? In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 32–49). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Laclau, E. (2014). The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (1st ed.). London/ New York: Verso.Google Scholar

M

  1. Marchart, O. (2014). Institution and Dislocation: Philosophical Roots of Laclau’s Discourse Theory of Space and Antagonism. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(3), 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin, J. (2013). Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Marttila, T. (2015). Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  4. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

N

  1. Nyyssönen, H. (1999). Presence of the Past in Politics: ‘1956’ in Hungary After 1956. Jyväskylä: Sophi.Google Scholar

P

  1. Palonen, K. (2006). The Struggle with Time: A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Palonen, E. (2008). The City-Text in Post-Communist Budapest: Street Names, Memorials and the Politics of Commemoration. GeoJournal, 73, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Palonen, E. (2009). Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2), 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Palonen, E. (2011). Rupture and Continuity: Fidesz and the Hungarian Revolutionary Tradition. In La Révolution française. Paris: Cahiers de l’Institut d’histoire de la Révolution française.Google Scholar
  5. Palonen, E. (2012). Transition to Crisis in Hungary: Whistle-Blowing on the Naked Emperor. Politics & Policy, 40(5), 930–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Palonen, E. (2013). Millennial Politics of Architecture: Reinstating the Nation in Budapest. Nationalities Papers, 41(4), 536–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Palonen, E. (2014). Assigning Meaning to (EU-)Europe Through Cultural Policy: European Capitals of Culture. In C. Wiesner & M. Schmidt-Gleim (Eds.), Meanings for Europe: Changes and Exchanges of a Contested Concept (Routledge Advances in Sociology, Vol. 118, pp. 144–159). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Palonen, E. (2015). The Politics of Street Names: Local, National, Transnational Budapest. In M. Beyen & G. Deseure (Eds.), Local Memories in a Nationalizing and Globalizing World (pp. 51–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Palonen, E. (2017). Building a New City Through a New Discourse. In R. Rose-Redwood, D. Alderman, & M. Azaryahu (Eds.), The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics, and Place (pp. 98–113). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Palonen, E., & Saresma, T. (2017). Jätkät & jytkyt: Perussuomalaiset ja populismin retoriikka. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  11. Pőcze, F. (2014). A Moszkva tér gyermekei. Budapest: Libri.Google Scholar
  12. Polyák, L. (2015). Hungary. DisP – The Planning Review, 51(1), 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R

  1. Rose-Redwood, R., Alderman, D., & Azaryahu, M. (2017). The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics, and Place. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

S

  1. Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Smith, A. D. (1990). Towards Global Culture? Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2), 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith, A. D. (1991). The Nation: Invented, Imagined, Reconstructed? Millennium, 20(3), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Smith, A. D. (1992). National Identity and the Idea of European Unity. International Affairs, 68(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

T

  1. Turnbull, N. (2017). Political Rhetoric and Its Relationship to Context: A New Theory of the Rhetorical Situation, the Rhetorical and the Political. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilia Palonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations