Advertisement

Landscape as a Geosystem

  • László Miklós
  • Erika Kočická
  • Zita Izakovičová
  • Dušan Kočický
  • Anna Špinerová
  • Andrea Diviaková
  • Viktória Miklósová
Chapter

Abstract

This is the core chapter of the book dealing with the theoretical principles of the geosystems. Defines the topical and choric models of geosystems, as well as the simplified model of the geocomplexes. There is explained the difference between state variables and typological characteristics of the elements of geosystems. Specific respect is given to the definition of the structures of the landscape. According to the genesis, physical character of the elements and according to the relation of structures to their role and management in planning processes we divide the landscape as geosystem to three substructures. Primary landscape structure is a set of material elements of the landscape and their relations that constitute the original and permanent foundation for other structures. These elements are mainly the elements of the abiotic sphere—the geological base and subsoils, soils, waters, georelief, air. Secondary landscape structure is constituted by human-influenced, reshaped and created material landscape elements that currently cover the Earth’s surface. These are the elements of land use, real biota, man-made objects and constructions. Tertiary (socio-economic) landscape structure is a set intangible (non-material) socio-economic factors/phenomena displayed to the landscape space as interests, manifestations and consequences of the activities of individual sectors that are relevant to landscape. These are the protection and other functional zones of nature and natural resources protection, hygienic and safety zones of industrial and infrastructure objects, zones of declared zones of specific environmental measures, administrative boundaries, etc. Finally, the chapter gives the geosystem definition of the landscape and its reflection in the law in Slovakia. This definition reeds: “Landscape is a complex system of space, location, georelief and other mutually, functionally interconnected material natural elements and elements modified and created by a man, in particular the geological base and soil creating substratum, soil, water bodies, air, flora and fauna, artificial structures and the elements of land use, as well as their connections, which determine also the socio-economic factors related to landscape. Landscape is the environment of man and other living organisms.” The chapter is illustrated by figures and graphics explaining the structure of the geosystem.

Keywords

Geosystem Geocomplex Elements Primary landscape structure Secondary landscape structure Tertiary landscape structure 

References

  1. Antrop M (2005) From holistic landscape synthesis to transdisciplinary landscape management. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application, UR Frontis Series, vol 12. Springer Science + Business Media, Wageningen, 5 Sept 2011, pp 27–50. http://library.wur.nl/frontis/landscape_research/03_antrop.pdf.accessed
  2. Antrop M (2013) A brief history of landscape research. In: Howard P, Ian Thompson I, Waterton E (eds) The Routledge companion to landscape studies. Routledge, Oxon, New York, pp 12–22Google Scholar
  3. Antrop M, Van Eetvelde V (2017) Landscape perspectives. The holistic nature of landscape. Springer, Netherlands, p 372Google Scholar
  4. Bailey RG (2002) Ecoregion-based design for sustainability. Nova Iorque: Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastian O (2001) Landscape ecology—towards an unified discipline? Landscape Ecol 16:757–766Google Scholar
  6. Bastian O (2008) Landscape classification between fact and fiction. In: Lechnio J, Kulczyk S, Malinowka E, Szumacher I (eds) Landscape classification. Theory and practice, Warshaw, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  7. Bastian O, Schreiber KF (1994) Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena - Stuttgart, p 502Google Scholar
  8. Bastian O, Kronert R, Lipsky Z (2006) Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol 21:359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobeck H, Schmithüsen J (1949) Die Landschaft im logischen System der Geographie. Erdkunde 3:112–120Google Scholar
  10. Brandt J (1995) Ecological networks in Denmark. In: Van Buuren M, Jongman R (eds) Ecological networks in Europe, Special issue of the journal “Landschap”, Wageningen, pp 63–76Google Scholar
  11. Brandt J (1999) Geography as ‘landscape ecology’ Dan J Geogr 1(Special Issue):21–32Google Scholar
  12. Breuste J, Kozová M, Finka M (eds) (2009) European landscapes in transformation: challenges for landscape ecology and management european IALE conference 2009, Salzburg (Austria), Bratislava (Slovakia)Google Scholar
  13. Bruns D, Kühne O, Schönwald A, Theile S (eds) (2015) Landscape culture—culturing landscapes. The differentiated construction of landscapes. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658042837
  14. Bunce RGH, Ryszkowski L, Paoletti MG (1993) Landscape ecology and agroecosystems. Lewis Publishers Conference publication, Boca Raton, FL, p 241Google Scholar
  15. Chorley RJ, Kennedy BA (1971) Physical geography—a system approach. Prentice—Hall Interantional Inc, London, p 370Google Scholar
  16. Christopherson RW, Cunha S, Thomsen CE (2016) Geosystems core. Pearson, p 512Google Scholar
  17. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Csorba P (1987) A tájökológia időszerű kérdései az angol nyelvű szakirodalom alapján. Földrajzi Közlemények 35 (111) (1–2):74–80Google Scholar
  19. Csorba P (1988) The ecogeographical pattern map of Tokaj “Great Hill” and its environs. In: Ruzicka M, Hrnciarová T, Miklós L (eds) Spatial and functional relationships in landscape ecology. VIIIth international symposium on problems of landscape ecological research. IEBE CBES of SAS. IALE East European Region, vol 1. Bratislava, pp 273–284Google Scholar
  20. Csorba P (2008a) Landscape ecological fragmentation of the small landscape units (Microregions) of Hungary based on the settlement network and traffic infrastructure. Ekológia (Bratislava) 27(1):99–116Google Scholar
  21. Csorba P (2008b) A tájhatárok kijelölése és változása. Földrajzi Közlemények 132(2):220–226Google Scholar
  22. Csorba P(2014) A tájszerkezet földrajzi értelmezése. A geographical interpretation of landscape structure. 4D Tájépítészeti és kertművészeti folyóirat. J Landscape Archit Gard Art 36:32–39Google Scholar
  23. Csorba P, Szabó Sz (2012) The application of landscape indices in landscape ecology. In: Tiefenbacher J (ed) Perspectives on nature conservation—patterns, pressures and prospects. pp 121–140. http://www.intechopen.com/books/perspectives-on-natureconservation-patterns-pressures-and-prospects/the-application-of-landscape-indices-in-landscape-ecology
  24. De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 6:453–462Google Scholar
  25. Demek J (1974) Systémová teórie a štúdium krajiny. Studia Geographica, 40, Brno, Geografický ústav ČSAV, p 198Google Scholar
  26. Demek J (1978) The landscape as a geosystem. Geoforum 9(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diviaková A (2011) Biotické komplexy pre environmentálny manažment. VKÚ, a. s., Harmanec, p 120Google Scholar
  28. Drdos J, Urbánek J, Mazúr E (1980) Landscape syntheses and their role in solving the problems of environment, vol 32. Geografický Casopis, Bratislava pp 119–l29Google Scholar
  29. Drdoš J, Miklós L, Kozová M, Urbánek J (1995) Základy krajinného plánovania. Technická univerzita Zvolen, p 172Google Scholar
  30. Ellenberg H (ed) (1973): Ökosystemforschung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Farina A (1998) Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Chapmann and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Feranec J, Oťaheľ J (2001) Krajinná pokrývka Slovenska/Land cover of Slovakia. Bratislava (Veda)Google Scholar
  33. Finke L (1994) Landschaftsökologie. Westermann Verlag, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  34. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 632Google Scholar
  35. Forman RTT, Godron M (1981) Patches and structural components for landscape ecology. Bioscience 31:733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forman RTT Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Golley FB, Bellot J (eds) (1991) Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landscape Urban Plann 21(1–2):3–11Google Scholar
  38. Grodzinski MD (2005) Piznannya landschaftu: misce i prostir (Understanding Landscape. Place and Space. In Ukrain). Kiev. U 2-x t. Vidavnicsho-poligrafichesky centr Kiivsky universitet. T.1, 431 pp., T.2, 503 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) (2015) Ecosystem services—concept, methods and case studies. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, p 312Google Scholar
  40. Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guth J, Kučera T (1997) Monitorování změn krajinného pokryvu s využitím DPZ a GIS. Příroda 10:107–124Google Scholar
  42. Haase G (1973) Zu Inhalt und Terminologie der topischen und chorischen Landschaftserkundung. Beitrag zu IIIrd Internacional Symposium on Problems of Ecological Landscape Research, Smolenice, Bratislava: ÚBK SAV, p 19Google Scholar
  43. Haase G (1978) Zur Ableitung und Kennzeichnung von Naturraumpotentialen. Petermanns Geogr Mitt 122(2):113–125Google Scholar
  44. Haase G (1980) Izučenie topičeskich i choričeskich struktur, ich dinamiki i razvitija v landšaftnych sistemach. In: Structura, dinamika i razvitije landšaftov. Moskva: Institut geografii AN SSSR, pp 57–81Google Scholar
  45. Haase G et al (1991) Naturraumerkundung und Landnutzung. Geochorologische Verfahren zur Analyse, Kartierung und Bewertung von Naturräumen. Beiträge zur Geographie. Berlin, 34, I und IIGoogle Scholar
  46. Haase G (1996) Geotopologie und Geochorologie — Die Leipzig-Dresdner Schule der Landschaftsökologie. In: Haase G, Eichler E (Hrsg): Wege und Fortschritte der Wissenschaft. — Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Akademie Verlag, pp 201–229Google Scholar
  47. Haber W (1980) Entwicklung und Probleme der Kulturlandschaft im Spiegel ihrer Ökosysteme. Forsiarchiv Jg. 51, H. 12, 245–250Google Scholar
  48. Haber W (2002) Kulturlandschaft zwischen Bild und Wirklichkeit. In: Schweizerisches Akademie der Geistes und Sozialwissenschaften. Bern, Akadenmievorträge, Heft IX, p 19Google Scholar
  49. Haber W (2004) Landscape ecology as a bridge from ecosystems to human ecology. Ecol Res 19:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Haber W (2005) Pflege des Landes – Verantwortung für Landschaft und Heimat. In: Deutscher Rat für Landespflege (ed): Landschaft und Heimat. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege, Meckenheim 77:100–107Google Scholar
  51. Haber W (2007) Vorstellungen über Landschaft. In: Busch B (ed) Jetzt ist die Landschaft ein Katalog voller Wörter. In: Beiträge zur Sprache der Ökologie, 5:78–85Google Scholar
  52. Hofierka J, Šúri M (1996) Modelling spatial and temporal changes of soil water erosion. Geografický časopis 48:255–269Google Scholar
  53. Hrnčiarová T, Miklós L (1991) Morphometric indices in the interpretation of water and material motion dynamics illustrated on the example Dolná Malanta. Ecology (CSFR) 10(2):187–221Google Scholar
  54. Hunziker M, Buchecker M, Hartig T (2007) Space and place—two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. In: Kienast F, Wildi O, Ghosh S (eds) A changing world. Challenges for landscape research, Landscape Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  55. Hynek A (2010) Krajina: objekt nebo konstrukt? In: Herber V (ed) Fyzickogeografický sborník 8. Fyzická geografie a kulturní krajina. MU, Brno, pp 138–142Google Scholar
  56. Hynek A (2011) Geografie – geograficita prostorovost. In: Svobodová H (ed) Prostorovost: místa, území, krajiny, regiony, globiony. Sborník príspěvku z konference. GaREP, s.r.o. Brno, pp 6–50Google Scholar
  57. Isachenko AG (1980) Optimization of the Natural Environment. Moscow: Mysl. Topological Aspects of the Science of Geosystems. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1974Google Scholar
  58. Isachenko AG (1981) Predstavlenije o geosisteme v sovremennoj fizičeskoj geografiji. Izv. VGO Leningrad 113(4):297–306Google Scholar
  59. Iverson AL, Marín LE, Ennis KK, Gonthier DJ, Connor-barrie BT, Remfert JL, Cardinale BJ, Perfecto I (2014) Do polycultures promote winâ wins or tradeâ offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A metaâ analysis. J Appl Ecol 51(6):1593–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones KB, Zurlini G, Kienast F, Petrosillo I, Edwards T, Wade TG, Li B-L, Zaccarell N (2013) Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landscape Ecol 28:1175–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge, p 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. IX. Kárpát-medencei környezettudományi konferencia (2013) Symposium abstracts, Miskolci Egyetem, Sapientia Erdélyi Magyar Tudományegyetem. MiskolcGoogle Scholar
  63. Kerényi A (2003) Környezettan. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, p 470Google Scholar
  64. Kertész Á (2002) Tájökológia. Holnap Kiadó, Budapest, p 166Google Scholar
  65. Kertész Á (2010) Tájökológiai kutatások 2010. IV. Magyar Tájökológiai Konferencia, MTA FKI, Budapest, p 294Google Scholar
  66. Khoroshev AV, Eremeeva AP, Merekalova K A (2013) Evaluation of intercomponents linkages in the steppe and taiga landscapes with account for modifiable areal unit. Proc of Russ Geogr Soc 145(3):32–42 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  67. Kienast F, Wildi O, Ghosh S (eds) (2007) A changing world. Challenges for landscape research. Landscape series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 753–754Google Scholar
  68. Kistowski (1998) Relations between the structure of landscape and its potential at the territory of last glaciation in Poland. In: The problems of landscape ecology, vol III, Warsaw, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  69. Kolejka M et al (2011) Krajina Česka a Slovenska v současném výzkumu. Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogicka fakulta, BrnoGoogle Scholar
  70. Konkoly-Gyuró E, Tirási Á, Wrbka T, Prinz M, Renetzeder C (2010) Der Charakter grenzüberschreitender Landschaften. Das Fertő/Neusiedlersee-Hanság-Becken und die Region Sopron. Verlag Universität Westungarn. Lőverprint, Sopron, p 43Google Scholar
  71. Kozová M, Hrnčiarová T, Drdoš et al (2007) Landscape ecology in Slovakia. Development, current state, and perspectives. Contribution of the slovak landscape ecologists to the IALE world congress 2007 and to the 25th anniversary of IALE. Bratislava: Ministry of the environment of the Slovak Republic, Slovak association for landscape ecology—IALE-SK, 2007, CD ROM, p 541Google Scholar
  72. Krcho J (1968) Prírodná časť geosféry ako kybernetický systém a jeho vyjadrenia v mape. Bratislava, Geografický časopis, 20(2):115–130Google Scholar
  73. Krcho J (1974) Štruktúra a priestorová diferenciácia fyzicko -geografickej sféry ako kybernetického systému. Bratislava, Geografický časopis 26(2):132–162Google Scholar
  74. Krcho J (1978) The spatial organisation of the physical-geographical sphere as a cybernetic system expressed by means of measure as entropy. In: Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitas Comenianae, Geographica, vol 16. pp 57–147Google Scholar
  75. Krcho J (1991) Georelief as a subsystem of landscape and the influence of morphometric parameters of georelief on spatial diferentation of landscape-ecological processes. Ecology (CSFR), Bratislava 10(2):115–158Google Scholar
  76. Landscape Ecology (2015) Symposium abstracts. In:17th International symposium. ILE SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  77. Landscape Ecology: From Theory to Practice (2012) In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on problems of landscape ecological research. ILE SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  78. Leser H (1991) Landschaftsökologie: Ansatz, Modelle, Methodik, Anwendung. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, p 647Google Scholar
  79. Leser H (1997) Landschaftsökologie. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  80. Longatti P, Dalang T (2007) The meaning of “Landscape”—an exegesis of Swiss Government texts. In: Kienast F, Wildi O, Ghosh S (eds) A changing world. Challenges for landscape research. Landscape series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  81. Łowicki D, Mizgajski A (2013) Typology of physical-geographical regions in Poland in line with land-cover structure and its changes in the years 1990–2006. W: Geographia Polonica, Warszawa, 86(3):255–266Google Scholar
  82. Mander Ü, Müller F, Wrbka T (2005) Functional and structural landscape indicators: upscaling and downscaling problems. Ecol Ind 5(4):267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McGarigal K (2002) Landscape pattern metrics. In: El-Shaarawi AH, Piegorsch WW (eds) Encyclopedia of environmetrics, Chichester, vol 2. Wiley, England, pp 1135–1142Google Scholar
  84. Mezősi G, Fejes Cs (2004) Landscape metrics (in Hungarian), In: Táj és Környezet, MTA FKI, Budapest, Hungary, pp 229–242Google Scholar
  85. Mičian Ľ (1982) A system approach to landscape and the sciences realizing it with a special to the system of geographical scienecs. In: VIth International symposium on problems of landscape ecological research, Piešťany, Institute of Experimental Biology and Ecology SAS, Bratislava, Oct 1982Google Scholar
  86. Miklós L (1988) Space and position—scene of the origin of spatial ecological landscape problems. Ekológia (ČSSR) 7:381–395Google Scholar
  87. Miklós L, Hrnčiarová T et al (eds) (2002) Atlas krajiny Slovenskej republiky. 1. vydanie, MŽP SR Bratislava, SAŽP Banská Bystrica, p 344Google Scholar
  88. Miklós L, Izakovičová Z (1997) Krajina ako geosystém. VEDA, SAV, Bratislava, p 152Google Scholar
  89. Miklós L, Špinerová A (2011) Krajinno-ekologické plánovanie LANDEP. VKÚ, Harmanec, p 159Google Scholar
  90. Miklós L, Diviaková A, Izakovičová Z (2011a) Ekologické siete a územný systém ekologickej stability. Vydavateľstvo TU vo Zvolene, p 141Google Scholar
  91. Miklós L, Ivanič B, Kočický D (2011b) Krajinnoekologická základňa integrovaného manažmentu povodia Ipľa. Digitálna databáza a tematické mapové vrstvy. Projekt HUSK 0801/2.1.2/0162 Vytvorenie jednotného monitoringu na báze priestorového informačného systému v povodí Ipľa. Banská Štiavnica, Esprit, spol. s r. o. (elektronický zdroj)Google Scholar
  92. Miklós L, Izakovičová Z, Kanka R, Ivanič B, Kočický D, Špinerová A, David S, Piscová V, Štefunková D, Oszlányi J, Ábrahámová A (2011c) Geografický informačný systém povodia Ipľa: Katalóg GIS a výber máp. Bratislava: Ústav krajinnej ekológie SAV: Katedra UNESCO, Fakulta ekológie a environmentalistiky, Technická univerzita Zvolen, Esprit Banská Štiavnica, p 143Google Scholar
  93. Miklós L, Németh R, Verrasztó Z (2014) Application of GIS in studying the drainage basin of the Ipoly River. Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute, Tulcea, Romania, 20:109–128Google Scholar
  94. Mizgajski A, Markuszewska I (eds) (2010) Implementation of landscape ecological knowledge in practice. The problems of landscape ecology. Volume XXVIII. Polish Association for Landscape Ecology, Wydawnictvo Naukowe Adam Miczkiewicz University, PoznańGoogle Scholar
  95. Mizgajski A, Stępniewska M (2012) Ecosystem services assessment for Poland—challenges and possible solutions. Ekonomia i Środowisko, Białystok 2(42):54–73Google Scholar
  96. Mosimann T (1984) Methodische Grundprinzipien für die Untersuchung von Geoökosystemen in der topologischen Dimension. In: Geomethodica, Veröff. 9. Basler Geometh. Coll., Bd. 9:31–65Google Scholar
  97. Mosimann T (1990) Ökotope als elementare Prozesseinheiten der Landschaft (Konzept zur prozessorientierten Klassifikation von Geosystem). Geosynthesis, 1, Geographisches Institut der Universität Hanover, p 56Google Scholar
  98. Nassauer JI (ed) (1997) Placing nature: culture and landscape ecology. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  99. Naveh Z (1990) Landscape ecology as a bridge between bioecology and human ecology. In: Svobodova H (ed) Cultural aspects of landscape. Pudoc Wageningen, p 173Google Scholar
  100. Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1984) Landscape ecology—theory and application. Springer, New York, p 356Google Scholar
  101. Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1993) Landscape ecology—theory and application, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1994) Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Neef E (1963) Topologische und chorologische Arbeitsweisen in der Landschaftsforschung. PGM 107(4):249–259Google Scholar
  104. Neef E (1967) Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre. H. Haack, Gotha, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  105. Neef E, Richter H, Barsch H, Haase G (1973) Beitrage zur Klarung der Terminologie in der Landschaftsforschung Geographisches Institut der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Leipzig, p 28Google Scholar
  106. Odum EP (1975) Ecology: the link between the natural and the social sciences, 2nd edn. Holt Rinehart and Winston, London, New York, Sidney, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  107. Oťaheľ J (2004) Landscape and landscape research in Slovakia. Belgeo - Revue belge de géographie 2–3. Landscape research in EuropeGoogle Scholar
  108. Oťaheľ J, Feranec J, Cebecauer T, Pravda J, Husár K (2004) Krajinná štruktúra okresu Skalica: hodnotenie zmien, diverzity a stability. Geographia Slovaca, 19, p 123Google Scholar
  109. Pedroli B (ed) (2000) Landscape our home (Lebensraum Landschaft). Indigo, Zeist StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  110. Preobrazhensky VS (1983) System orientation of landscape research in geography and its present-day realization. In: Drdoš J (ed) Landscape synthesis. Geoecological foundations of the complex landscape management. VEDA, Bratislava, pp 31–36Google Scholar
  111. Preobrazhensky VS, Minc AA (1973) Sootnoshenye ponyaty geosystema a ekosystema. In: Práce a materiály z biológie krajiny 20. Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on the landscape ecological research. ÚBK SAV, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  112. Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on the Landscape Ecological Research (1973) Práce a materiály z biológie krajiny 20, ÚBK SAV, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  113. Proceedings of 4th Congress of the Czechoslovak Geographers (1978) Geographical institute of the SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  114. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on the Landscape Ecological Research (1976) Institute of experimental biology and ecology SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  115. Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on the Landscape Ecological Research (1979) Institute of experimental biology and ecology SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  116. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Problems of Landscape Ecological Research (1982) Institute of experimental biology and ecology SAS, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  117. Puzachenko JG (2006) Landscape planning: general fundamentals, methodology, technology. Moscow, pp 4–80 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  118. Renetzeder C, Wrbka T, Mücher S, Eupen MV, Kiers M (2010) Landscape structure analysis in selected european regions and its use for sustainability impact assessment. In: Andel J, Bicik I, Dostal P, Lipsky Z, Shahneshin SG (eds) Landscape modelling. Geographical space, transformation and future scenarios, Urban and landscape perspectives, vol 8, p 236Google Scholar
  119. Richling A, Solon J (1993) Ekologia krajobrazu. Wydaznictvo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, p 225Google Scholar
  120. Richling A, Solon J (1996) Landscape ecology. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, p 464 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  121. Risser PG, Karr JR, Forman RTT (1984) Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey. Special Publ. 2, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  122. Ružička M (2000) Krajinnoekologické plánovanie - LANDEP. (Systémový prístup v krajinnej ekológii). Združenie BIOSFÉRA. BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  123. Ružička M, Miklós L (1982) Landscape ecological planning (LANDEP) in the process of territorial planning. Ekologia (CSSR) 1(3):297–312Google Scholar
  124. Ružička M et al (1978) Krajinné zložky, prvky a štruktúra v biologickom plánovaní krajiny. Quasestiones geobiologicae 23:7–63Google Scholar
  125. Ružičková H, Ružička M (1973) Druhotná štruktúra krajiny ako kritérium biologickej rovno¬váhy. Quaestiones geobiologicae 12:23–62Google Scholar
  126. Schilleci F, Todaro V, Lotta F (2017) Connected lands: new perspectives on ecological networks planning. Springer, p 85Google Scholar
  127. Schmithüsen J (1968) Was ist eine Landschaft?. Universität d. Saarlandes, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmithüsen J (1974) Landschaft und Vegetation. Geograph. Inst. d. Univ. d. Saarlandes, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  129. Schmithüsen J (1976) Allgemeine Geosynergetik. Grundlagen der Landschaftskunde. de Gruyter, New York, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  130. Schreiber KF (1980) Brachflachen in der Kulturlandschaft. Daten und Dokumente zum Umweltschutz, Sonderreihe Umwelttaguug ‘Okologische Probleme in Agrarlandschaften’, Univ. Hohenheim 30:61–93Google Scholar
  131. Schreiber K F (1985) Was leistet die Landschaftsäkologie für eine àkologische Planung? Schriften reihe für Orts-, Regional-und Landesplanung 34. Zürich, Switzerland, pp 7–28Google Scholar
  132. Snacken F, Antrop M (1983) Structure and dynamics of landscape systems. In: Drdoš J (ed) Landscape synthesis: geoecological foundations of the complex landscape management. VEDA, Bratislava, pp 10–30Google Scholar
  133. Snytko VA (1983) Substance dynamics in geosystems GeoJournal 7(2):135–138Google Scholar
  134. Snytko V, Semenov YM (2008) The study of geosystem structure, development and functioning in Siberia. The V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch of RAS IrkutskGoogle Scholar
  135. Sochava VB (1977) Landscapes of Southeastern Siberia (1:1 500000 map). Russia, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  136. Sochava VB (1978) Vvedenie v učenije o geosistemach (An Introduction to the Science of Geosystems in Russian). Nauka, Novosibirsk, p 319Google Scholar
  137. Špinerová A (2015) Štruktúra krajiny ako regulátor dynamiky pohybu vody a materiálu. Technická univerzita Zvolen, p 132Google Scholar
  138. Špulerová J, Dobrovodská M et al. (2011) Stratégia ochrany a manažmentu historických štruktúr poľnohospodárskej krajiny v modelovom území Liptovská Teplička. Bratislava: Ústav krajinnej ekológie SAV, p 152Google Scholar
  139. Stanová V, Valachovič M et al (eds) (2002) Katalóg biotopov slovenska. Bratislava: DAPHNE – Inštitút aplikovanej ekológie, p 225Google Scholar
  140. Šteffek J, Gallay I, Gallayová Z, Kunca V, Lepeška T, Olah B, Škvareninová J, Ujházy K, Ujháziová M, Wiezik M, Križanová Z (2008) Krajinnoekologický výskum: teória, metódy a prax. Zvolen: FEE TU, p 222Google Scholar
  141. Štefunková D et al (2011) Vybrané výsledky výskumu starej vinohradníckej krajiny Svätého Jura. In Ekologické štúdie: Vedecký časopis venovaný aktuálnym problémom ekológie, krajinnej ekológie a príbuzných vedných disciplín 2(1–2):126–131, ISSN 1338-2853Google Scholar
  142. Štefunková D, Hanušin J (2015) Analysis of the spatial and temporal distribution of selected landscape diversity indexes in detailed scale (Example of Viticultural Landscape Svätý Jur). In: Halada Ľ, Bača A, Boltižiar M (eds) Landscape and landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on landscape ecology. Institute of landscape ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 185–191Google Scholar
  143. Szabó M (2007) Tájszerkezeti változások a Felső-Szigetközben az elmúlt 20 évben. Földrajzi Közlemények. CXXXI. (LV). 1(2):55–74Google Scholar
  144. Szabó M (2008) A bioszféra sokfélesége—az élővilág változatossága és veszélyeztetettsége. Földrajzi Közlemények. 132(4):441–449Google Scholar
  145. Szabó Sz, Csorba P, Varga K (2008) Landscape indices and landuse—tools for landscape managment. In: Plit J, Andreychouk V (eds) Methods of landscape research, Dissertations Commission of Cultural Landscape, Sosnowiec, Poland, 8:7–20, ISSN 1896-1460Google Scholar
  146. Szádeczky-Kardoss E (1989) A jelenségek univerzális kapcsolódása (Akadémiai Kiadó Bp., pp 1–292)Google Scholar
  147. Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology 16(3):284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33(2):309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Teleki P (1917) A földrajzi gondolat története -MTA székfoglaló, (Kossuth Könyvkiadó. Bp. 1996:1–194Google Scholar
  150. Tjallingii SP, De Veer AA (eds) (1982) Perspectives in landscape ecology. In: Proceedings of the 1st international congress in landscape ecology, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, 6–11 Apr 1981Google Scholar
  151. Tremboš P (1994) Geoekologická syntéza Diviackej pahorkatiny - metodický postup vymedzovania základných krajinných jednotiek. In: Minár, J. (ed.): Prírodná časť krajiny, jej výskum a návrhy na využitie, /Zborník/, KFGaG PRIF UK, Bratislava, pp 118–120Google Scholar
  152. Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape Urban Plann 57(3–4):143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Troll C (1939) Luftbildplan und ökologische Bodenforschung (Aerial photography and ecological studies of the earth). Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde, Berlin, pp 241–298Google Scholar
  154. Turner M (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of the landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol 4(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Turner M G, Gardner RH (eds) (1991) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  156. Vejre H, Brandt J (2004) Contemporary Danish landscape research. Belgeo—Revue belge de géographie 2–3. Landscape research in EuropeGoogle Scholar
  157. Verrasztó Z (1979) Land formation and the geological aspects of environmental protection. In: Symposium Changes of the geological environment under the influence of man’s activity. IAEG National group, Krakow-SandomierzBelchatow-Plock-Warszawa, pp 135–141Google Scholar
  158. Verrasztó Z (2017) Holisztikus környezeti modellezés kartográfiai, GIS és távérzékelési módszerek alkalmazásával. Remote Sens 7(1):490–516Google Scholar
  159. Veteikis D, Kavaliauskas P, Skorupskas R (2015) Assessing the optimality of landscape structure in a landscape plan (a Lithuanian example) In: Halada Ľ, Bača A, Boltižiar M (eds) Landscape and landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on landscape ecology. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 348–358Google Scholar
  160. Vidal De La Blache P (1922) Principes de géographie humaine. Armand Colin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  161. Vološčuk I (2003) Ochrana prírody krajiny. TU vo Zvolene, ZvolenGoogle Scholar
  162. von Bertalanffy L (1950) An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci 1(2):134–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory. Foundations, development and applications. George Brazileer, Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  164. Wascher D (ed) (2005) European landscape character areas. Alterra Report, No. 1254, p 160Google Scholar
  165. Wascher D, Jongman R (2000) European landscapes, classification, assessment and conservation. European Environmental Agency, CoppenhagenGoogle Scholar
  166. Wrbka T (2009) Das Waldviertel - Wildnisreste in historisch gewachsener Kulturlandschaft am Grünen Band Europas. In: Wrbka T, Zmelik K, Grünweis FM (eds) Das Grüne Band Europas - Grenze.Wildnis.Zukunft. Weitra. Bibliothek der Provinz, p 342Google Scholar
  167. Wrbka T, Erb KH, Schulz NB, Peterseil J, Hahn CO, Haberl H (2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. an empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Wrbka T, Stocker-Kiss A, Schmitzberger I, Peterseil J (2005) Network landscapes of Austria—identification and ecological assessment. In: Konkoly Gyuró É (ed) Greenways. Conference presentations on ecological corridors, green corridors, Sopron, Hungary, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  169. Wu J (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecol 28:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Žigrai F (1983) Krajina a jej využívanie. 1. vyd. Brno: UJEP, 1983, p 131Google Scholar
  172. Žigrai F (1995) Integračný význam štúdia využitia zeme v geografii a krajinnej ekológii na príklade modelového územia Lúčky v Liptove. Geografické štúdie, p 4Google Scholar
  173. Žigrai F (2015) Meta-landscape ecology as a new ecological science (selected metascientific aspects). In: Halada Ľ, Bača A, Boltižiar M (eds) Landscape and landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on landscape ecology. Institute of landscape ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, pp 25–35Google Scholar
  174. Zonneveld JIS (1981) The ecological backdrop of regional geography. In: Tjallingii SP, de Veer AF (eds) Perspective in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the international congress of the Netherlands society of landscape ecology, Veldhoven, PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 67–90Google Scholar
  175. Zonneveld IS (1995) Land ecology: an introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation. Land management and conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • László Miklós
    • 1
  • Erika Kočická
    • 1
  • Zita Izakovičová
    • 2
  • Dušan Kočický
    • 3
  • Anna Špinerová
    • 1
  • Andrea Diviaková
    • 1
  • Viktória Miklósová
    • 2
  1. 1.UNESCO-Chair for Sustainable DevelopmentTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Landscape Ecology SASBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.ESPRIT Ltd.Banská ŠtiavnicaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations