Advertisement

Democracies and Their Citizens

  • Jennifer Shore
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

This chapter examines the implications of economic inequality for the quality of democracy and discusses the origins and various forms of democratic citizenship. How socioeconomic inequality can constrain an equal exercise of politics rights is the second focus of the chapter. Citizens with fewer resources, for example, in terms of income, education, or social networks, are also those who are the least likely to be engaged with politics. Those who lack socioeconomic, cultural, and cognitive capital are, therefore, at a much greater risk of experiencing disadvantages across various spheres of citizenship. The trap of poverty is thus not constrained to economic disadvantage but renders other forms of citizenship difficult to attain as well.

References

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alber, Jens, and Ulrich Kohler. 2009. The Inequality of Electoral Participation in Europe and America and the Politically Integrative Functions of the Welfare State. In United in Diversity? Comparing Social Models in Europe and America, ed. Jens Alber and Neil Gilbert, 63–90. International Policy Exchange Series. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Political Science Association Task Force. 2004. American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270404040X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2008. Income, Inequality, and Electoral Participation. In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Pablo Beramendi and Christopher J. Anderson, 278–311. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beramendi, Pablo, and Christopher J. Anderson. 2008. Income Inequality and Democratic Representation. In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Pablo Beramendi and Christopher J. Anderson, 3–24. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Berinsky, Adam J., and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2011. Education and Political Participation: Exploring the Causal Link. Political Behavior 33 (3): 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9134-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Scholzman. 1995. Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bühlmann, Marc, Wolfgang Merkel, Bernhard Wessels, and Lisa Müller. 2007. The Quality of Democracy: Democracy Barometer for Established Democracies. NCCR Working Paper (10). Accessed March 18, 2018. http://opus.kobv.de/hsog/volltexte/2010/121/.
  12. Dagger, Richard. 2008. Republican Citizenship. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, ed. Engin F. Isin and Bryan S. Turner. Repr., 145–157. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, Larry. 2010. Why Are There No Arab Democracies. Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond, Larry, and Leonardo Morlino, eds. 2005a. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2005b. Introduction. In Assessing the Quality of Democracy, ed. Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino, ix–xliii. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elster, Jon. 1982. The Case for Methodological Individualism. Theory and Society 11 (4): 453–482. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferejohn, John. 2009. Is Inequality a Threat to Democracy? In The Unsustainable American State, ed. Lawrence R. Jacobs and Desmond S. King, 34–57. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedom House. 2018. Freedom in the World 2018. Washington, DC. Accessed February 27, 2018. http://www.freedomhouse.org/reports.
  21. Galston, William A. 2001. Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayes, Bernadette C., and Clive S. Bean. 1993. Political Efficacy: A Comparative Study of the United States, West Germany, Great Britain and Australia. European Journal of Political Research 23 (3): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hernes, Helga M. 1988. Scandinavian Citizenship. Acta Sociologica 31 (3): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iversen, Torben. 2008. Capitalism and Democracy. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, 601–623. Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Janowitz, Morris. 1991. On Social Organization and Social Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1994. Observations on the Sociology of Citizenship. In Citizenship: Critical Concepts, ed. Bryan S. Turner and Peter Hamilton, 42–62. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. King, Desmond, and Jeremy Waldron. 1988. Citizenship, Social Citizenship and the Defence of Welfare Provision. British Journal of Political Science 18 (4): 415–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Pippa Norris, 31–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kymlicka, Will. 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lane, Robert Edwards. 1959. Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma—Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2001. Democracy in the 21st Century: Can We Be Optimistic? European Review of Social Psychology 9 (2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798701000163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  34. Maslow, Abraham H. 1943. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1975. Three Essays: On Liberty, Representative Government, the Subjection of Women. With the Assistance of R. (e.) Wollheim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nie, Norman H., Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Barry. 1996. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pateman, Carole. 2000. Participation and Democratic Theory. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Persson, Mikael. 2010. An Empirical Test of the Relative Education Model in Sweden. Political Behavior 33 (3): 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9138-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ringen, Stein. 2007. What Democracy Is For: On Freedom and Moral Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2004. Addressing Inequality. Journal of Democracy 15: 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saunders, Trevor J. 2000. Politics: Books I and II. Reprinted. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1942. Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
  44. Shklar, Judith N. 1991. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shore, Jennifer. 2014. How Welfare States Shape Participatory Patterns. In How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public: Policy Feedback, Participation, Voting and Attitudes, ed. Staffan Kumlin and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen, 41–62. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  46. Simpson Bueker, Catherine. 2009. The Limits of Political Citizenship. Society 46 (5): 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solt, Frederick. 2008. Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2012. A Remedy for Unequal Participation? How Welfare States Impact on Social and Political Engagement. In Professionalization and Individualized Collective Action: Analyzing New ‘Participatory’ Dimensions in Civil Society, ed. William Maloney and Jan W. van Deth, 139–156. Milton Park and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  50. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Scholzman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Shore
    • 1
  1. 1.Mannheim Centre for European Social ResearchUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations