Advertisement

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Model and Landslide Susceptibility

  • Sujit Mandal
  • Subrata Mondal
Chapter

Abstract

The present study is dealt with the preparation of landslide susceptibility map of Darjeeling Himalaya with the help of GIS tools and artificial neural network (ANN) model. Fifteen landslide causative factors, i.e. elevation, slope aspect, slope angle, slope curvature, geology, soil, lineament density, distance to lineament, drainage density, distance to drainage, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetted index (TWI), rainfall, normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI) and land use and land cover (LULC) were considered to produce the landslide susceptibility zonation map. To generate all these aforesaid causative factors map, topographical maps, geological map, soil map, satellite imageries, Google earth images and some other authorized maps were processed and constructed into a spatial data base using GIS and image processing techniques. The back-propagation method was applied to estimate factor’s weight and the landslide hazard indices were derived with the help of trained back-propagation weights. Then, the landslide susceptibility zonation map of Darjeeling Himalaya was made using GIS tool and classified into five, i.e. very low, low, moderate, high, and very low landslide susceptibility. To validate the prepared landslide susceptibility map, landslide inventory was used and accuracy result was obtained after processing ROC curve. The accuracy of the landslide susceptibility map was 81.5% which is desirable.

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility Artificial neural network (ANN) GIS tool ROC curve 

References

  1. Aleotti, P. (2004). A warning system of rainfall-induced shallow failure. Engineering Geology, 73, 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerji, P. K., Guha, P. K., & Dhiman, L. C. (1980). Inverted metamorphism in the Sikkim-Darjeeling Himalaya. Geological Society of India, 21, 330–342.Google Scholar
  3. Benardos, A. G., & Kaliampakos, D. C. (2004). A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—illustrated by Athens Metro, Greece. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41(4), 987–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benardos, A. G., Benardos, A. P. (2005). Applications of artificial neural networks in geotechnology. Chron Min Metall, 15(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
  5. Bui, D. T., et al. (2012). Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in HoaBinh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena, 96, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caparrini, F., Caporali, E., & Castelli, F. (1996). Neural network analysis of satellite images for land cover discrimination. In P. Claps & F. Siccardi (Eds.), Mediterranean Storms. Proceedings of the EGS Plinius Conference held at Maratea, Italy, October, 1999 (pp. 603–613).Google Scholar
  7. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V., & Reichenbach, P. (1991). GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16, 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guazzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (1995). GIS techniques in mapping landslide hazard. In A. Carrara & F. Guzzetti (Eds.), Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards (pp. 135–175). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosta, G. (1998). Regionalization of rainfall threshold: an aid to landslide hazard evaluation. Environmental Geology, 35(2–3), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crozier, M. J. (1999). Prediction of rainfall-triggered landslides: a test of the antecedent water status model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24, 825–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emami, S. M. R., Iwao, Y., & Harada, T. (1998) Performance of Artificial Network system in prediction issues of earthquake engineering. Proceedings of 8th International IAEG Congress (pp. 733–738).Google Scholar
  12. Fausett, L. (1994). Fundamentals of neural networks architectures, Algorithms and applications (p. 461). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Froehlich, W., Gil, E., Kasza, I., & Starkel, L. (1990). Thresholds in the transformation of slopes and river channels in the Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Mountain Research and Development, 10(4), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glade, T., Crozier, M., & Smith, P. (2000). Applying probability determination to refine landslidetriggering rainfall thresholds using an empirical Antecedent Daily Rainfall Model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 1059–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guzzetti, F., Cardinali, M., Reichenbach, P., Cipolla, F., Sebastiani, C., Galli, M., & Salvati, P. (2004). Landslides triggered by the 23 November 2000 rainfall event in the Imperia Province, Western Liguria, Italy. Engineering Geology, 73, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guzzetti, F., Peruccacci, S., Rossi, M., & Stark, C. P. (2007) Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, online first version. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-007-0262-7. Retrieved July 8, 2007.
  17. Hagan, T. M., Demuth, B. H., & Beale, H. M. (1996). Neural network design, Electrical Engineering Series (p. 730). Boston: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  18. Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks. A comprehensive foundation (2nd ed.p. 696). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Hong et al. (2005). The influence of intense rainfall on the activity of large scale crystalline schist landslides in Shikoku Island, Japan. Landslides, 2, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong, H., et al. (2015). Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena, 133, 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ilanloo, M. (2011). A comparative study of fuzzy logic approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS: an experience of Karaj dam basin in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 668–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, S., Ryu, J., Min, K., & Won, J. (2001). Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS ‘01 (vol. 5, pp. 2364–2366), IEEE 2001 International.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., Lee, M. J., & Won, J. S. (2003a). Landslide susceptibility analysis using artificial neural network at Boun, Korea, Environmental Geology, 44, 820–833.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., Min, K. D., & Won, J. S. (2003b). Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27, 1361–1376.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, S., Ryu, J. H., Lee, M. J., & Won, J. S. (2006). The Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Janghung, Korea. Mathematical Geology, 38(2), 199–220.Google Scholar
  26. Mayoraz, F., Cornu, T., & Vuillet, L. (1996) Using neural networks to predict slope movements. Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Landslides, Trondheim, June 1966, 1 (pp. 295–300). Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  27. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. II). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Montgomery, D. R., & Dietrich, W. E. (1994). A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resources Research, 30(4), 1153–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pistocchi, A., Luzi, L., & Napolitano, P. (2002). The use of predictive modeling techniques for optimal exploitation of spatial databases: a case study in landslide hazard mapping with expert system-like methods. Environmental Geology, 41, 765–775.Google Scholar
  30. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010a). Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environment and Earth Science, 60, 1037–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010b). Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(6), 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010c). Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides, 7(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sezer, E. A., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2011). Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8208–8219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Starkel, L. (1972). The role of catastrophic rainfall in the shaping of the relief of the Lower Himalaya (Darjeeling Hills). Geographia Polonica, 21, 103–147.Google Scholar
  35. Terlien, M. T. J. (1997). Hydrological landslide triggering in ash covered slopes of Manizales (Columbia). Geomorphology, 20, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Terlien, M. T. J. (1998). The determination of statistical and deterministic hydrological landslide triggering thresholds. Environmental Geology, 35(2–3), 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsangaratos, P., & Ilia, I. (2016). Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece. Landslides, 13(2), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wieczorek, G. F. (1987). Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on debris flows in central Santa Cruz Mountains, California. In G. Crosta & G. F. Wieczorek (Eds.), Debris flows/ avalanches: Processes, recognition and mitigation, Reviews in Engineering Geology (Vol. 7, pp. 23–104). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
  39. Wieczorek, G. F. (1996). Landslide triggering mechanisms. In: Turner, A. K., Schuster, R. L. (Eds.), Landslides: Investigation and mitigation (pp. 76–79), Transportation Research Board, Special Report 247. Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, R. C., & Wieczorek, G. F. (1995). Rainfall threshold for the initiation of debris flow at La Honda, California. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 1(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu, X., Ren, F., & Niu, R. (2014). Landslide susceptibility assessment using object mapping units, decision tree, and support vector machine models in the Three Gorges of China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71(11), 4725–4738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zezere, J. L., Trigo, R. M., & Trigo, I. F. (2005). Shallow and deep landslides induced by rainfall in the Lisbon region (Portugal): Assessment of relationships with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou, W. (1999). Verfication of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classification, IEEE Trans. On Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 771–779.Google Scholar
  44. Zhu, A.-X., et al. (2014). An expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and fuzzy logic. Geomorphology, 214, 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sujit Mandal
    • 1
  • Subrata Mondal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyDiamond Harbour Women’s UniversitySarishaIndia
  2. 2.University of Gour BangaMokdumpurIndia

Personalised recommendations