Exploring Large Stereoscopic 3D Dashboards for Future Automotive User Interfaces

  • Florian WeidnerEmail author
  • Wolfgang Broll
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 786)


The ongoing digitalization of our world also offers an increasing amount of information to the human. To present this data to a driver, visualization strategies are necessary going beyond traditional displays. In this paper we investigate the effect of stereoscopic 3D (S3D) visualization and the influence of the S3D contents’ locations on the dashboard. In a driving simulator study, 61 participants were required to perform a car following task. Using a large-scale S3D dashboard, the experimental group was exposed to a stereoscopic 3D visualization, whereas the control group experienced traditional 2D. While driving, they had to perform two simplified tasks: first a change detection task and after that a list selection task. Analysis indicates that the presentation of S3D content has no statistically significant influence on secondary task performance and driving performance. This applies for the entire dashboard as well as for its individual subareas. There was no effect with respect to simulator sickness.


Information interfaces and presentation Multimedia and systems Automotive user interfaces Artificial, Augmented, and Virtual realities Screen design Driving simulation 



This work has partially been funded by the Free State of Thuringia, Germany, through the VISTA4F project (FKZ: TUI-I-01-14).


  1. 1.
    Chun, J., Kim, S., Dey, A.K.: Exploring the value of information delivered to drivers. In: Stanton, N.A., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 27–31 July 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA, pp. 963–977. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Continental: Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays as key-technology for holistic HMI (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rümelin, S., Butz, A.: How to make large touch screens usable while driving. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haeuslschmid, R., Pfleging, B., Alt, F.: A design space to support the development of windshield applications for the car. In: Proceedings of the 2016 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McIntire, J.P., Havig, P.R., Geiselman, E.E.: Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: a comprehensive review. Displays 35, 18–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howard, I.P., Rogers, B.J.: Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reichelt, S., Haussler, R., Fütterer, G., Leister, N.: Depth cues in human visual perception and their realization in 3D displays. In: Three Dimensional Imaging, Visualization and Display, vol. 7690, pp. 76900B–76900B–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lambooij, M., IJsselsteijn, W., Fortuin, M., Heynderickx, I.: Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 53, 30201 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D.M., Banks, M.S.: The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. J. Vis. 11, 1–29 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tönnis, M., Broy, V., Klinker, G.: A survey of challenges related to the design of 3D user interfaces for car Drivers. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, p. 134 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broy, N., André, E., Schmidt, A.: Is stereoscopic 3D a better choice for information representation in the car? In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szczerba, J., Hersberger, R.: The use of stereoscopic depth in an automotive instrument display: evaluating user-performance in visual search and change detection. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, pp. 1184–1188 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broy, N., Guo, M., Schneegass, S., Pfleging, B., Alt, F.: Introducing novel technologies in the car - conducting a real-world study to test 3D dashboards. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2015, pp. 179–186. ACM Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pitts, M.J., Hasedžić, E., Skrypchuk, L., Attridge, A., Williams, M.: Adding depth: establishing 3D display fundamentals for automotive applications. In: SAE Technical Paper. SAE International (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broy, N., Alt, F., Schneegass, S., Pfleging, B.: 3D displays in cars: exploring the user performance for a stereoscopic instrument cluster. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2014, pp. 1–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 203–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alper, B., Hollerer, T., Kuchera-Morin, J., Forbes, A.: Stereoscopic highlighting: 2D graph visualization on stereo displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 17, 2325–2333 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ilmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations