Advertisement

Participant Training for a Flight Test Evaluation of Interval Management

  • Roy Roper
  • Brian Baxley
  • Kurt Swieringa
  • Clay HubbsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 785)

Abstract

Interval Management is a concept designed to be used by air traffic controllers and flight crews to more efficiently and precisely manage inter-aircraft spacing. NASA, in cooperation with Boeing, Honeywell, and United Airlines, tested an avionics prototype onboard flight test aircraft. A critical need was identified to train the pilots participating in the flight test prior to the first flight. This paper documents the flight training regimen that successfully trained the pilots on the Interval Management concepts and flight crew procedures and suggests potential improvements to future training regimens for industry use.

Keywords

Interval Management Pilot training Cockpit procedures Flight test 

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson III, J.E., Thipphavong, J., Johnson, W.C.: Enabling performance-based navigation arrivals: development and simulation testing of terminal sequencing and spacing system. Air Traffic Control Q. 23(1), 5–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Callantine, T.J., Hunt, S.M., Prevot, T.: Simulation evaluation of controller-managed spacing tools under realistic operational conditions. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, HCI-Aero 2014. Association Computing Machinery, New York, NY (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barmore, B., et al.: Interval management: development and implementation of an airborne spacing concept. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2016-1608, San Diego, CA (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Tulder, P.A.: Flight Deck Interval Management Flight Test Final Report. NASA CR-2017-219626 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Cino, T.J.: A usability and learnability case study of glass flight deck interfaces and pilot interactions through scenario-based training. Nova Southeastern University (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell, B.S., Kozlowski, S.W.J.: Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(2), 296–316 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis, K.A., Harris, D.: Computer-based simulation as an adjunct to ab-initio flight training. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 8(3), 261–276 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alves, E.: FIM Avionics Operations Manual. NASA CR-2017-219593 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swieringa, K., et al.: Flight test evaluation of the ATD-1 interval management application. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), AIAA 2017-4094, Denver, CO (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baxley, B.A., et al.: Flight crew survey responses from the interval management (IM) avionics Phase 2 flight test. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), AIAA 2017-4095, Denver, CO (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scharl, J.: Boeing Post-Flight Data Analysis Report. The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, doc. num. D780-10416-1 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baxley, B., et al.: Human-in-the-loop assessment of alternative clearances in interval management arrival operations. NASA TP-2016-219362 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baxley, B., et. al.: Experiment description and results for arrival operations using interval management with spacing to parallel dependent runways. NASA TP-2013-217998 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Roper
    • 1
  • Brian Baxley
    • 1
  • Kurt Swieringa
    • 1
  • Clay Hubbs
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA
  2. 2.All Aspect Aerospace Innovations, LLCParkerUSA

Personalised recommendations