Advertisement

Sense and Sensibility in Fashion Design Education

  • Ines Simoes
  • Mário Matos Ribeiro
  • Nuno Nogueira
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 785)

Abstract

This article discusses the conventional function of drawing as a tool to generate ideas and solve problems in Western art and in art and design higher education. The problem of design ideation is also examined regarding Generation Z fashion students and their seeming inability to express ideas through drawing. In our view, this is not because they don’t have graphic skills but because they exclude from consciousness much of the clothes details, a circumstance that is inversely proportional to their access to fashion images via digital devices as well as clothes via fast fashion stores. Our aim is not to discredit fashion education’s orthodox approach altogether, but to contribute to its redesign toward a more hands-on methodology. Thus, we present six exercises that use drawing in combination with other exploratory techniques, as their effectiveness proved their right to become part of the curriculum of our BA in Fashion Design.

Keywords

Drawing Generation Z Fashion design’s orthodox approach Alternative exploratory approaches 

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson, K.: Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative, 2nd edn. Wiley-Academy, Chichester (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finch, J.: What is Generation Z, and what does it want? FastCompany (2015). https://www.fastcompany.com/3045317/what-is-generation-z-and-what-does-it-want
  3. 3.
    Burnett, R.: The Evolution of Reading (2017). https://ron-burnett.squarespace.com/?offset=1493515483698
  4. 4.
    Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    What is Drawing? Education and community programmes, Irish Museum of Modern Art (2013). http://www.imma.ie/en/downloads/whatisdrawing2013.pdf
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Sennet, R.: The Craftsman. Penguin, London (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seivewright, S.: Research and Design. AVA Publishing, Lausanne (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    South, H.: What is a working drawing? (2017). https://www.thoughtco.com/working-drawing-fine-art-definition-1123036
  10. 10.
    Sorger, R., Udale, J.: The Fundamentals of Fashion Design. AVA Publishing, Lausanne (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldschmidt, G.: The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Des. Issues Winter 19(1), 72–88 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huette, S., Kello, C.T., Rhodes, T., Spivey, M.J.: Drawing from memory: hand-eye coordination at multiple scales. PLoS ONE 8(3), e58464 (2013). Ed. Joy J. GengCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joy, A., Sherry, J., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., Chan, R.: Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fash. Theory 16(13), 273–296 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pallasmaa, J.: The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Wiley-Academy, Chichester (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Palfrey, G., Gasser, U.: Born digital: How Children Grow Up in a Digital Age. Basic Books, Philadelphia (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, A.: Move Over, Millennials, Here Comes Generation Z. The New York Times (2015). https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/fashion/move-over-millennials-here-comes-generation-z.html
  18. 18.
    Chon, H.: Fashion as aesthetic experience: a discussion of subject-object interaction. In: 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research: Consilience and Innovation in Design. Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freeman, C., Marcketti, S., Karpova, E.: Creativity of images: using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards. Fash. Text. 4, 17 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vyzoviti, S.: Super Surfaces: Generating Forms for Architecture, Products and Fashion. Page One Publishing Private, Singapore (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoette, R.: col·lec·tion. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Research Through Design Conference, Cambridge, UK, Article 34 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monteiro, P.: Como Evitar el Obvio en la era de la facilidad. In: 7º Encuentro Bid Enseñanza y Diseño, pp. 179–180 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ines Simoes
    • 1
  • Mário Matos Ribeiro
    • 1
  • Nuno Nogueira
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for Architecture, Urbanism and Design (CIAUD)Lisbon School of ArchitectureLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations