Advertisement

Conceptual Description of the Key Determinants of Effective Monitoring and Evaluation System

  • Callistus TenganEmail author
  • Clinton Aigbavboa
  • Didi Thwala
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 785)

Abstract

This chapter presents a conceptual description of the key determinants of effective monitoring and evaluation system as critical factors for the successful implementation of projects. This is done through a comprehensive review of literature. Nineteen (19) monitoring and evaluation determinants were identified via the extensive review of journal, conference and academic thesis’. The top five (5) determinants were identified as budgetary allocation for M&E, data quality, technical capacity of the M&E team or department, leadership and monitoring and evaluation information system (MEIS). The study advocates for a critical approach to budgeting and allocating funds for M&E, the quality of M&E data gives the necessary confidence in the M&E finding upon which project panning relies on, there is the need to build the technical capacity of the M&E team and or department through training to undertake effective M&E and finally adopt effective and efficient approach in the implementation of M&E. The compliment of all the above determinates will see a shift in the era of poor performance to one of a successful project implementation.

Keywords

Budgetary allocation Data quality Leadership Monitoring & Evaluation Stakeholder involvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Amoah, P., Ahadzie, D.K., Dansoh, A.: The factors affecting construction performance in Ghana: the perspective of small-scale building contractors. Ghana Surv. 4(1), 41–48 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munns, A.K., Bjeirmi, B.F.: The role of project management in achieving project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 14(2), 81–87 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takim, R., Akintoye, A.: Performance indicators for successful construction project performance. In: 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, vol. 2, pp. 545–555 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tengan, C., Aigbavboa, C.: The role of monitoring and evaluation in construction project management. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2018). Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, 7–9 January 2018, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, pp. 571–582. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otieno, F.A.O.: The roles of monitoring and evaluation in projects. In: 2nd International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries: Challenges Facing the Construction Industry in Developing Countries, pp. 15–17 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tengan, C., Aigbavboa, C.: Evaluating barriers to effective implementation of project monitoring and evaluation in the ghanaian construction industry. Procedia Eng. 164, 389–394 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alreck, P.I., Settle, R.B.: The Survey Research Handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girden, E.R., Kabacoff, R.I.: Evaluating Research Articles: From Start to Finish, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Ltd., Los Angeles (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kissi, E., Boateng, E.B., Adjei-Kumi, T., Badu, E.: Principal component analysis of challenges facing the implementation of value engineering in public projects in developing countries. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 17(2), 142–150 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kimani, R.N.: The Effect of Budgetary Control on Effectiveness of Non-government Organisations in Kenya, School of Business, University of Nairobi (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamau, C.G., Mohamed, H.B.: Efficacy of monitoring and evaluation function in achieving project success in Kenya: a conceptual framework. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 3(3), 82 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Musomba, K.S., Kerongo, F.M., Mutua, N.M., Kilika, S.: Factors affecting the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation of constituency development fund projects in Changamwe Constituency, Kenya. J. Int. Acad. Res. Multidiscip. 1(8), 175–216 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mugambi, F., Kanda, E.: Determinants of effective monitoring and evaluation of strategy implementation of community based projects. Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev. 2(11), 67–73 (2013). ISSN 2278-0211Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mugo, P.M., Oleche, M.O.: Monitoring and evaluation of development projects and economic growth in Kenya. Int. J. Nov. Res. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2(6), 52–63 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muiga, M.I.J.: Factors Influencing the use of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of Public Projects in Nakuru County. University of Nairobi, Kenya (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogolla, F., Moronge, M.: Determinants of effective monitoring and evaluation of government funded water projects in Kenya: a case of Nairobi County. Strateg. J. Bus. Change Manag. 3(1), 329–358 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oloo, D.O.: Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Monitoring and Evaluation of Constituency Development Fund Projects in Likoni Constituency, Kenya. University of Nairobi, Kenya (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seasons, M.: Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning: considering the realities. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 69(4), 430–440 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kusek, J.Z., Rist, R.C.: Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development Practitioners. World Bank, Washington, DC (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gudda, P.: A Guide to Project Monitoring & Evaluation. AuthorHouse, Bloomington (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ile, I.U., Eresia-Eke, C., Allen-Ile, C.: Monitoring and Evaluation of Policies, Programmes and Projects. Van Schaik, Pretoria (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Omonyo, A.B.: Lectures in Project Monitoring & Evaluation for Professional Practitioners. Lambert Academic Publishing, Deutschland (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mulandi, N.M.: Factors influencing performance of monitoring and evaluation systems of non-governmental organizations in governance: a case of Nairobi, Kenya. University of Nairobi (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Otieno Okello, L.: Determinants of effective monitoring and evaluation system of public health programs: a case study of school-based hand washing program in Kwale County, Kenya. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Manag. Sci. 3(3), 235 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Waithera, L., Wanyoike, D.M.: Influence of project monitoring and evaluation on performance of youth funded agribusiness projects in Bahati Sub-County, Nakuru, Kenya. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. 3(11), 375–394 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Njama, A.W.: Determinants of effectiveness of a monitoring and evaluation system for projects: a case of AMREF Kenya WASH programme. University of Nairobi (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luthra, A., Dahiya, R.: Effective leadership is all about communicating effectively: connecting leadership and communication. Int. J. Manag. Bus. Stud. 5(3), 43–48 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Crawford, P., Bryce, P.: Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 21(5), 363–373 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Callistus Tengan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Clinton Aigbavboa
    • 1
  • Didi Thwala
    • 1
  1. 1.Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, and the Built EnvironmentUniversity of JohannesburgAuckland ParkSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department Of Building TechnologyBolgatanga PolytechnicSumbrunguGhana

Personalised recommendations