Advertisement

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning as an Intervention for Maritime Education and Training

  • Amit Sharma
  • Salman NazirEmail author
  • Astrid Camilla Wiig
  • Charlott Sellberg
  • Marius Imset
  • Steven Mallam
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 785)

Abstract

Maritime domain is one of the most high-risk industry and it predominantly employs simulator training as a means to train the prospective operators. Maritime instructors need to train students who will become future sharp end operators and interact in highly safety critical environment. One of the goals of maritime education is therefore to create relevant learning activities among the trainees which will help them not only to learn the highly contextualized/situated knowledge of work settings but who are able to work together in team demonstrating qualities such as critical thinking and leadership. Educational frameworks that take into account the unique nature of maritime domain are therefore needed to be identified. Sociocultural perspectives suggests that learning is situated in communities of practice. In order to study how people learn in practice, it is necessary to study how individuals interact with other members and the different mediational tools that are at their disposal for engagement in specific activities. In this exploratory study, we analyze the maritime simulator training through the lens of sociocultural perspective and propose computer supported collaborative learning as an intervention for maritime education and training. We describe the salient characteristics of collaborative learning and its relevance for maritime education and computer supported training. An observation study was carried out at a maritime simulator training facility. The aim is to better understand/explore the complexities of maritime simulator training and reflect on how the collaborative learning approach can be better used to support the connections of simulated learning activities and its relevance in real life maritime operations.

Keywords

Sociocultural learning theory Maritime education Simulator training Computer supported collaborative learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manuel, M.E.: Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET) - trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 16(3), 473–483 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nazir, S., Øvergård, K.I., Yang, Z.: Towards effective training for process and maritime industries. Procedia Manuf. 3, 1519–1526 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emad, G.R.: Introduction of technology into workplace and the need for change in pedagogy. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(2), 875–879 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hjelmervik, K., Nazir, S., Myhrvold, A.: Simulator training with maritime complex tasks - an experimental study. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 17(1), 17–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0133-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hontvedt, M., Arnseth, H.C.: On the bridge to learn - analysing the social organization of nautical instruction in a ship simulator. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 8(1), 89–112 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sellberg, C., Lundin, M.: Tasks and instructions on the simulated bridge - discourses of temporality in maritime training. Discourse Stud. 20(2), 289–305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flin, R.H., O’Connor, P., Crichton, M.: Safety at the Sharp End - A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Hampshire (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tolmie, A.K., Topping, K.J., Christie, T., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., Thurston, A.: Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learn. Instr. 20(3), 177–191 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sellberg, C.: Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment - a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 16(2), 247–263 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koschmann, T.: Toward a theory of computer support for collaborative learning. J. Learn. Sci. 3(3), 219–225 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mercer, N., Howe, C.: Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning - the value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learn. Cultur. Soc. Interact. 1(1), 12–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludvigsen, S.: The school of the future - renewal of subjects and competences. (Official Norwegian Reports NOU 2015: 8). Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pellegrino, J.W., Hilton, M.L.: Education for Life and Work - Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saavedra, A.R., Opfer, V.D.: Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan 94(2), 8–13 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stahl, G.: Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 21(2), 79–90 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koschmann, T.: Paradigm shifts and instructional technology - an introduction. In: Koschmann, T. (ed.) CSCL - Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, pp. 1–23. Routledge, New Jersey (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Säljö, R.: Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning - technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(1), 53–64 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hontvedt, M.: Professional vision in simulated environments—examining professional maritime pilots’ performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator. Learn. Cultur. Soc. Interact. 7, 71–84 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sellberg, C.: Representing and enacting movement - the body as an instructional resource in a simulator-based environment. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22(5), 2311–2332 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sellberg, C.: From briefing, through scenario, to debriefing: the maritime instructor’s work during simulator-based training. Cogn. Technol. Work. 20(1), 49–62 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Joolingen, W.R., Jong, T.D., Lazonder, A.W., Savelsbergh, E.R., Manlove, S.: Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(4), 671–688 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ke, F., Carafano, P.: Collaborative science learning in an immersive flight simulation. Comput. Educ. 103, 114–123 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharma, A., Nazir, S.: Distributed situation awareness in pilotage operations: implications and challenges. TransNav – Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 11(2), 289–293 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz, D.L.: The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. J. Learn. Sci. 4(3), 321–354 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stahl, G.: Team cognition in socio technical systems. In: Stahl, G. (ed.) Essays in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, USA (2017). Lulu.com
  27. 27.
    Stahl, G.: Group cognition as a foundation for the new science of learning. In: Khine, M.S., Saleh, I.M. (eds.) New Science of Learning - Computers, Cognition and Collaboration in Education, pp. 23–44. Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stahl, G.: Group practices: a new way of viewing CSCL. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 12(1), 113–126 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Froholdt, L.L.:‘I see you on my radar’ - displays of the confirmatory form in maritime technologically mediated interaction. Sociol. Rev. 64(3), 468–494 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strijbos, J.W.: Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(1), 59–73 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slavin, R.E.: Research on cooperative learning and achievement - what we know, what we need to know. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 21(1), 43–69 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stahl, G., Rosé, C.P.: Analyzing cognition in online teams. In: Stahl, G. (ed.) Essays in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, USA (2017). Lulu.com

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Sharma
    • 1
  • Salman Nazir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Astrid Camilla Wiig
    • 1
  • Charlott Sellberg
    • 2
  • Marius Imset
    • 1
  • Steven Mallam
    • 1
  1. 1.Training and Assessment Research Group, Department of Maritime OperationsUniversity College of Southeast NorwayPorsgrunnNorway
  2. 2.Unit for Pedagogical Development and Interactive LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations