Advertisement

Parallel-in-Time for Parabolic Optimal Control Problems Using PFASST

  • Sebastian GötschelEmail author
  • Michael L. MinionEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 125)

Abstract

In gradient-based methods for parabolic optimal control problems, it is necessary to solve both the state equation and a backward-in-time adjoint equation in each iteration of the optimization method. In order to facilitate fully parallel gradient-type and nonlinear conjugate gradient methods for the solution of such optimal control problems, we discuss the application of the parallel-in-time method PFASST to adjoint gradient computation. In addition to enabling time parallelism, PFASST provides high flexibility for handling nonlinear equations, as well as potential extra computational savings from reusing previous solutions in the optimization loop. The approach is demonstrated here for a model reaction-diffusion optimal control problem.

Notes

Acknowledgements

S.G. gratefully acknowledges partial funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Project WE 2937/6-1. The work of M.M. was supported by the Applied Mathematics Program of the DOE Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research under the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References

  1. 1.
    A.T. Barker, M. Stoll, Domain decomposition in time for PDE-constrained optimization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 136–143 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Bourlioux, A.T. Layton, M.L. Minion, High-order multi-implicit spectral deferred correction methods for problems of reactive flow. J. Comput. Phys. 189(2), 651–675 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Buchholz, H. Engel, E. Kammann, F. Tröltzsch, On the optimal control of the Schlögl-model. Comput. Optim. Appl. 56(1), 153–185 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.H. Dai, Y. Yuan, A nonlinear conjugate gradient method with a strong global convergence property. SIAM J. Optim. 10(1), 177–182 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Deng, M. Heinkenschloss, A parallel-in-time gradient-type method for discrete time optimal control problems. Preprint, Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University (2016). Available from http://www.caam.rice.edu/$sim$heinken Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Dutt, L. Greengard, V. Rokhlin, Spectral deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations. BIT Numer. Math. 40(2), 241–266 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Emmett, M.L. Minion, Toward an efficient parallel in time method for partial differential equations. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 7, 105–132 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Gander, 50 years of time parallel time integration, in Multiple Shooting and Time Domain Decomposition Methods: MuS-TDD, Heidelberg, 6–8 May 2013, ed. by T. Carraro et al. (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 69–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.J. Gander, F. Kwok, Schwarz methods for the time-parallel solution of parabolic control problems, in Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXII, ed. by T. Dickopf et al. (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Günther, N.R. Gauger, J.B. Schroder, A non-intrusive parallel-in-time adjoint solver with the XBraid library. Comput. Vis. Sci. 19(3), 85–95 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Heinkenschloss, A time-domain decomposition iterative method for the solution of distributed linear quadratic optimal control problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 173(1), 169–198 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Herzog, A. Rösch, S. Ulbrich, W. Wollner, OPTPDE: a collection of problems in PDE-constrained optimization, in Trends in PDE Constrained Optimization, ed. by G. Leugering et al. (Springer, Cham, 2014), pp. 539–543zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Hinze, R. Pinnau, M. Ulbrich, S. Ulbrich, Optimization with PDE Constraints (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Mathew, M. Sarkis, C.E. Schaerer, Analysis of block parareal preconditioners for parabolic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(3), 1180–1200 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.L. Minion, Semi-implicit spectral deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations. Commun. Math. Sci. 1(3), 471–500 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization (Springer, New York, 2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Speck, D. Ruprecht, M. Emmett, M.L. Minion, M. Bolten, R. Krause, A multi-level spectral deferred correction method. BIT Numer. Math. 55, 843–867 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Ulbrich, Preconditioners based on “parareal” time-domain decomposition for time-dependent PDE-constrained optimization, in Multiple Shooting and Time Domain Decomposition Methods: MuS-TDD, Heidelberg, 6–8 May 2013, ed. by T. Carraro et al. (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 203–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Weiser, Faster SDC convergence on non-equidistant grids by DIRK sweeps. BIT Numer. Math. 55, 1219–1241 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zuse Institute BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations