Advertisement

The Physics and Control of Balancing on a Point in the Plane

  • Roy FeatherstoneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 124)

Abstract

This chapter presents a new model of the physical process of balancing in a vertical plane, in which the essential parameters of a robot’s balancing behaviour are distilled into just two numbers, regardless of the complexity of the robot. It also presents a balance control system based on this model, and a simple method for leaning in anticipation of future movements. The result is a control system that requires relatively little computation, yet allows a robot to make large, fast movements without falling over. Furthermore, by seeking to control the balance model only, instead of trying to control the whole robot, one achieves a separation between the potential complexity of the robot’s complete equations of motion and the simplicity of its balancing behaviour. The chapter concludes with a simulation study to illustrate the kind of performance that can be achieved, and a brief discussion on how the theory can be extended to 3D.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, B.D.O., Moore, J.B.: Linear Optimal Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1971)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azad, M.: Balancing and hopping motion control algorithms for an under-actuated robot. Ph.D. Thesis, The Australian National University, School of Engineering (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azad, M., Featherstone, R.: Balancing control algorithm for a 3d under-actuated robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Chicago, IL, Sept. 14–18, pp. 3233–3238 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azad, M., Featherstone, R.: Angular momentum based balance controller for an under-actuated planar robot. Autonom. Robots 40(1), 93–107 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkemeier, M.D., Fearing, R.S.: Tracking fast inverted trajectories of the underactuated acrobot. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(4), 740–750 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Featherstone, R.: Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Featherstone, R.: Quantitative measures of a robot’s ability to balance. In: Robotics Science & Systems 2015, Rome, 13–17 July (2015).  https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2015.XI.026
  8. 8.
    Featherstone, R.: Quantitative measures of a robot’s physical ability to balance. Int. J. Robot. Res. 35(14), 1681–1696 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Featherstone, R.: A simple model of balancing in the plane and a simple preview balance controller. Int. J. Robot. Res. 36(13–14), 1489–1507 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Featherstone, R., Orin, D.E.: Dynamics. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 35–65. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grizzle, J.W., Moog, C.H., Chevallereau, C.: Nonlinear control of mechanical systems with an unactuated cyclic variable. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50(5), 559–576 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2005.847057MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hauser, J., Murray, R.M.: Nonlinear controllers for non-integrable systems: the acrobot example. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 3–5 Nov, pp. 669–671 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miyashita, N., Kishikawa, M., Yamakita, M.: 3D motion control of 2 links (5 DOF) underactuated manipulator named AcroBOX. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 14–16, pp. 5614–5619 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabbani, A.H., van de Panne, M., Kry, P.G.: Anticipatory balance control. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Motion in Games, Los Angeles, CA, 6–8, pp. 71–76 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spong, M.W.: The swing up control problem for the acrobot. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 15(1), 49–55 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xin, X., Kaneda, M.: Swing-up control for a 3-DOF gymnastic robot with passive first joint: design and analysis. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(6), 1277–1285 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yonemura, T., Yamakita, M.: Swing up control of acrobot based on switched output functions. In: Proceedings of the SICE 2004, Sapporo, Japan, 4–6 Aug, pp. 1909–1914 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advanced RoboticsIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations