The Crisis of Economics

  • Mauro Gallegati
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


Economics is navigating in troubled waters. And even if a mainstream approach does exist, theoretical solidity and the ability to explain the empirical evidence are obviously increasingly fragile and challenged. “When the crisis came—recalls the former Governor of the ECB, Jean-Paul Trichet 2010—the serious limitations of existing economic and financial models became immediately apparent. Arbitrage broke down in many market segments, as markets froze and market participants were gripped by panic. Macro models failed to predict the crisis and seemed incapable of explaining what was happening to the economy in a convincing manner. As a policy-maker during the crisis, I found the available models of limited help. In fact, I would go further: in the face of the crisis, we felt abandoned by conventional tools.”


DSGE and general equilibrium Falsifiability Axiomatic economics 


  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven (1963)Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, O.: The state of macro. Annu. Rev. Econ. 1(1), 209–228 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaug, M.: Disturbing currents in modern economics. Challenge. XLI(3), 11–34 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cipolla, C.M.: Contro un nemico invisibile. Il Mulino, Bologna (1986)Google Scholar
  5. Clementi, F., Gallegati, M., Gianmoena, L., Landini, S., Stiglitz, J.E.: A new distributional index. Working paper, Università di Macerata (2018)Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, A., Harcourt, G.: What ever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies. J. Econ. Perspect. 17, 199–214 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colasante, A.: Experimental economics for ABM validation. In: Gallegati, M., Palestrini, A., Russo, A. (eds.) Agent Based Economics. An Introduction. Elsevier, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  8. Davis, M.: Planet of Slums. Verso, London (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Debreu, G.: Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. Wiley, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  10. Debreu, G.: Excess demand functions. J. Math. Econ. I, 15–21 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, M., Schwartz, A.J.: A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1963)Google Scholar
  12. Giacobello, M.L.: L’economia della Complessità di Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Le Lettere, Firenze (2012)Google Scholar
  13. Hicks, J.: Economics. A Discipline Not a Science. In: Hicks, J. (ed.) Classics and Moderns. Collected Essays in Economic Theory, vol. III, pp. 364–375. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1983)Google Scholar
  14. Hildebrand, W.: Market Demand. Theory and Empirical Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingrao, B., Israel, G.: Equilibrio economico, Enciclopedia delle Scienze Sociali, vol. III, pp. 605–606. Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Roma (1993)Google Scholar
  16. Jaffé, W.: Correspondence of Leon Walras and Related Papers, vol. I–III. North Holland, Amsterdam (1965)Google Scholar
  17. Kaldor, N.: The irrelevance of equilibrium analysis. Econ. J. LXXXII(328), 1237–1255 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirman, A.: The Intrinsic Limit of Modern Economic Theory. The Emperor Has No Clothes. Econ. J. XCIX(395), 126–139 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakatos, I.: Falsification and methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 170–196. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mankiw, N.G.: The macroeconomist as scientist and engineer. J. Econ. Perspect. XX(4), 29–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mantel, R.: On the characterization of aggregate excess demand. J. Econ. Theory. 7, 348–353 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NGR, B.: Verso un’altra economia ecologicamente e socialmente sostenibile. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino (2003)Google Scholar
  23. Popper, K.: Logik der Forschung (English transl.: The Logic of Scientific Discover, 1995, Routledge) (1935)Google Scholar
  24. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Gallimard, Paris (1979)Google Scholar
  25. Roncaglia, A.: Il mito della mano invisibile. Laterza, Roma-Bari (2005)Google Scholar
  26. Sonnenschein, H.: Market Excess Demand Functions. Econometrica. XL(3), 549–563 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Summers, L.: The scientific illusion in empirical macroeconomics. Scand. J. Econ. XCIII(2), 129–148 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trichet, J.: Reflections on the nature of monetary policy non-standard measures and finance theory. (2010)
  29. Woodford, M.: Convergence in macroeconomics. Elements of the new synthesis. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 1(1), 267–279 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauro Gallegati
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations