Midwives in Brazil: Education, Regulation of Practice and Professional Association

  • Nádia Zanon NarchiEmail author
  • Edemilson Antunes Campos
  • Dulce Maria Rosa Gualda


The International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) defined three pillars through which to strengthen midwifery worldwide. The present paper aims to describe how these three pillars—education, regulation and association—have progressed in Brazil. Following a brief overview of midwifery in Brazil and of the background behind the creation of the midwifery program at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, the characteristics of midwifery training are described in detail, as well as the peculiarities of the regulations governing the profession of midwifery and the relevance of social movements and associations in the process of the inclusion of midwives into the labour market, in achieving social visibility and fostering consolidation of the profession in the country. Next, the reports of two midwives regarding their first years of work in different settings are presented as a means of characterizing maternal and perinatal healthcare in Brazil. In conclusion, midwifery training has a visionary nature that seeks to transform the current obstetric care model in Brazilian society both quantitatively and qualitatively.


Midwifery training Midwifery regulation Midwifery association Midwifery care Brazil 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable testimonial contributions of the midwives Raphael Marques de Almeida Rosa da Cruz, e-mail:, and Thalita Vital Botelho, e-mail:


  1. Brazil. Law # 7498 of June 25, 1986 regulates the nursing profession and provides other measures. Brasília; 1986. (Document in Portuguese). Accessed 15 June 2017.
  2. Brazil. Decree Law # 94.406 of June 8, 1987 regulates Law # 7498 of June 25, 1986, which regulates the nursing profession and provides other measures. Brasília; 1987. (Document in Portuguese). Accessed 21 July 2017.
  3. Brazil. Ministry of Health’s Publication # 371 of May 7, 2014 establishes guidelines for the organization of comprehensive and humanized care for newborn infants under the Unified National Health System (SUS). Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2014. (Document in Portuguese). Accessed 10 June 2017.
  4. Brazil. Ministry of Health’s Publication # 11 of January 7, 2015 redefines the guidelines for the implantation and regulation of a normal childbirth centre within the scope of the Unified National Health System (SUS), for the care of the woman and her newborn infant at the time of delivery and of birth, in accordance with the childbirth component of the Stork Network, providing the respective financial incentives for investment, costing and monthly costing. Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2015. (Document in Portuguese). Accessed 10 June 2017.
  5. Castro CMC, Narchi NZ, Lopes GA, Macedo CM, Souza AC. Between the ideal and the possible: initial experiences of midwives in the Unified National Health System of São Paulo [Entre o ideal e o possível: experiências iniciais de obstetrizes no Sistema Único de Saúde de São Paulo]. Saúde e Sociedade. 2017;26(1):312–23. (In Portuguese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fullerton JT, Thompson JB, Severino R. The international confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. An update study: 2009–2010. Midwifery. 2011;27(4):399–408. Scholar
  7. Girardi SN, Fernandes JH, Carvalho CL. The regulation of health-related professions in Brazil [A regulamentação das profissões de saúde no Brasil]. Revista Espaço para a Saúde. 2000; 2(1). (In Portuguese). Accessed 20 May 2017.
  8. Gualda DMR, Narchi NZ, Campos EA. Strengthening midwifery in Brazil: education, regulation and professional association of midwives. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1077–81. Scholar
  9. Lansky S, Carvalho ML, Cunha AJLA, Cavalcante RS, Frias PG, Bittencourt SDA, Friche AAL, Silva AAM, Campos D. Birth in Brazil survey: neonatal mortality, pregnancy and childbirth quality of care. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S1–S15. Scholar
  10. Leal MC, Gama SGN. Born in Brazil. National survey on childbirth and birth - executive summary of the research [Nascer no Brasil. Inquérito Nacional sobre Parto e Nascimento - Sumário Executivo Temático da Pesquisa]. ENSP/FIOCRZ; 2012. (In Portuguese). Accessed 10 June 2017.
  11. Machado MH, Oliveira ES, Moyses NMN. Tendencies of the work model in healthcare in Brazil. In: Work in healthcare: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Rio de Janeiro: CEPESC, UERJ; 2011. p. 103–16. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  12. Merighi MAB, Gualda DMR. Mothers ‘health in Brazil and recovering the training of midwives for care in the birth process. Revista Latinoamericana de Enfermagem. 2009;17:265–70. (In Portuguese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Narchi NZ, Silva BA. Marketplace insertion and professional practice of direct-entry midwives in Brazil: a descriptive study. Am J Health Res. 2014;2(6):327–33. Scholar
  14. Narchi NZ, Silva LCFP, Gualda DMR, Bastos MH. Reclaiming direct entry midwifery training in Brazil: context, challenges and perspectives. Midwifery. 2010;26(4):385–8. Scholar
  15. Narchi NZ, Cruz EF, Gonçalves R. The role of midwives and obstetric nurses in promoting safe motherhood in Brazil [O papel das obstetrizes e enfermeiras obstetras na promoção da maternidade segura no Brasil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2013;18(4):1059–68. (In Portuguese).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Narchi NZ, Castro CM, Oliveira CF, Tambelini F. Report on the midwives’ experiences in the Brazilian National Health System: a qualitative research. Midwifery. 2017;53:96–102. Scholar
  17. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). Herramientas para el fortalecimiento de la partería profesional (Tools for strengthening professional midwifery). Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2006. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  18. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Latin American Centre for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health. Toolkit for strengthening professional midwifery in the Americas. 3rd ed. Montevideo: CLAP/WR; 2014.Google Scholar
  19. Silva KL, Sena RR, Grillo MJC, Gandra ED, Silveira MR. Expansion of undergraduate courses in nursing: dilemmas and contradictions facing the labour market. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(5):1219–26. Scholar
  20. Varella TC, Pierantoni CL. The nursing profession in Brazil: a job market under transformation? In: Work and education in health in the Mercosul. Rio de Janeiro: Brasília: Ministry of Health; 2008. p. 123–52. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  21. Victora CG, Aquino EMML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FCLF, Swartcwald CL. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1863–76. Scholar
  22. Wermelinger M, Machado MH, Amâncio Filho A. Professional educational policies: references and perspectives. Ensaio Aval Pol Públ Educ. 2007;15(55):207–22. Scholar
  23. World Health Organization. Safe motherhood needs assessment. Geneva: WHO; 2001. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  24. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. Geneva: WHO/ICM/FIGO; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nádia Zanon Narchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edemilson Antunes Campos
    • 1
  • Dulce Maria Rosa Gualda
    • 1
  1. 1.University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations