Advertisement

Children’s Agency in Child Protection Interventions

  • Mandy Duncan
Chapter

Abstract

Within this chapter I analyses the typology of participation presented in chapter four in more depth. The focus is on children’s agency within child protection interventions; that is, their capacity to act with autonomy and independence. The problem of children’s agency is probably the most significant contemporary issue in the study of childhood, but to date there is very little empirical work that attempts to analyse it theoretically. This chapter addresses this deficiency by foregrounding and interpreting the social actions of children and the effects that their actions cause. It bridges the gap between the macro and the micro; the structure (which will follow in chapters six and seven) and the actor (presented in chapters two, three and four). It connects the social conditions of childhood to the actions of children in their particular contexts and questions whether children are capable of knowing about, reflecting upon, and reconstructing the conditions of their participation in child protection interventions.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M. (2000). Being Human. The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M. (2012). The Reflexive Imperative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. (2013). Reflexivity. Sociopedia: Lausanne.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  7. Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Borke, H. (1975). Piaget’s Mountains Revisited: Changes in the Egocentric Landscape. Developmental Psychology, 11(2), 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1953). Child Care and the Growth of Love. Pelican: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  11. Brophey, J. (2014). Safeguarding Privacy and Respect for Children and Young People and the Next Steps in Media Access to Family Courts. Birkenhead: National Youth Advocacy Service & Association of Lawyers for Children.Google Scholar
  12. Buck-Morss, S. (1975). Socio-Economic Bias in Piaget’s Theory and Its Implications for 36 Cross-Cultural Studies. In K. Riegel (Ed.), The Development of Dialectical Operations. Basel: S-Karger.Google Scholar
  13. Casey, B., Tottenham, N., Liston, C., & Durston, S. (2005). Imaging the Developing Brain. What Have We Learned About Cognitive Development? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(3), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke, A., & Clarke, A. (1976). Early Experience: Myth and Evidence. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  15. Committee of Inquiry into the Care and Supervision Provided in Relation to Maria Colwell. (1974). Report of the Committee of Inquiry Into the Care and Supervision Provided by Local Authorities and Other Agencies in Relation to Maria Colwell and the Co-Ordination Between Them. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  16. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2011). Don’t Make Assumptions. Children and Young People’s Views of the Child Protection System and Messages for Change. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.Google Scholar
  17. Cossar, J., Brandon, M., Bailey, S., Belderson, P., & Biggart, L. (2013). ‘It Takes a Lot to Build Trust’. Recognition and Telling: Developing Earlier Routes to Help for Children and Young People. London: Office of the Children’s Comissioner.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: H. Holt & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Divers, A. (2014). Children and Developed Agency. Childhood & Philosophy, 9(18), 225–244.Google Scholar
  20. Durkheim, E. (1979). Essays of Morals and Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Eastman, A. (2014). Enough is Enough. A Report on Child Protection and Mental Health Services for Children and Young People. London: The Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  22. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is Agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar
  23. Esser, F., Baader, M., Betz, T., & Hungerland, B. (2016). Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood. New Perspectives in Childhood Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Habermas, J. (1986). The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Vol. I. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hay, C. (2001). What Place for Ideas in the Structure-Agency Debate? Globalisation as a ‘Process Without a Subject’. Writing in the Critical Social Sciences. London: First Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hobbes, T. (1651/1962). Leviathan. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  31. Holt, J. (2015). The Social Thought of Karl Marx. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Lansdown, G. (1995). Taking Part: Children’s Participation in Decision-Making. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  33. McKenna, J. (2013). Children & Young Peoples Views and Experiences of Children’s Hearings. A Summary. Edinburgh: Children’s Hearings Scotland.Google Scholar
  34. Meadows, S. (1993). The Child as a Thinker: The Development and Acquisition of Cognition in Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Morvan, Le. (2011). Healthy Skepticism and Practical Wisdom. Logos & Episteme ll, 1, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliver, C. (2010). Children’s Views and Experiences of Their Contact with Social Workers. A Focused Review of the Evidence. Leeds: CWDC.Google Scholar
  37. Oswell, D. (2013). The Agency of Children. From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rutter, M. (1981). Stress, Coping and Development: Some Issues and Some Questions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22(4), 323–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sartre, J. P. (1984). Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, G. (1997). Inalienable Rights? Liberty, 10(6), 51.Google Scholar
  46. Thomas, N. (2000). Children, Family and the State. Decision Making and Child Participation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Westcott, H., & Davies, G. (1996). Sexually Abused Children’s and Young People’s Perspectives on Investigative Interviews. British Journal of Social Work, 26, 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitehead, I., Henderson, G., Hanson, L., McNiven, G., Lamb, D., & Duru, E. (2009). The Views and Experiences of Children and Families Involved in the Children’s Hearings System in Scotland. Stirling: Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration.Google Scholar
  51. Winter, K. (2014). Understanding and Supporting Young Children’s Transitions into State Care: Schlossberg’s Transition Framework and Child-Centred Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Staffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK

Personalised recommendations