Advertisement

The Special Case of Non-human Primates in Animal Experimentation

  • Augusto Vitale
  • Marta Borgi
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Evolution Research book series (IDER)

Abstract

Non-human primates (NHP) occupy a special place in the relatively new Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. As a matter of fact, the word “primate” is the most frequently used in the text of the Directive, and some articles are specifically dedicated to these animals. The first part of this chapter will provide a brief history of the normative treatment of NHP, followed by a description of the normative passages in the Directive 2010/63/EU which deal with the use of NHP in Europe. A comparison among the member states which carry on research using primate models and their implementation of the EU Directive in national terms will be presented as well. Furthermore, an overview on the use of NHP in European biomedical studies and toxicology, both in terms of numbers and kind of studies, will be followed by a comparison with data coming from Japan and the USA. Then, the possible reasons why NHP represent a special case, in terms of their use in laboratory research, will be discussed: Are there justifiable reasons why NHP should be considered more valuable in moral and then legislative terms? The last part will offer some considerations on the day-by-day reality of working with NHP in biomedical research, trying to understand whether the relationship between a laboratory monkey and the laboratory staff (researchers, technicians, students, etc.) is different from the one established with, for example, a laboratory rodent.

Keywords

Animal experimentation Directive 2010/63/EU Ethics of research Human-animal bond Non-human primates Primatology Principle of the 3Rs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Simone Pollo for the stimulating discussions on the use of animals in research. The collection of data that led to the writing of part of this chapter has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-1) under grant agreement no 602616 (Project ANIMPACT).

References

  1. Altevogt BM, Pankevich DE, Shelton-Davenport MK, Kahn JP (eds) (2011) Chimpanzees in biomedical and behavioural research: assessing the necessity. National Academic Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayne K (2002) Development of the human-research animal bond and its impact on animal well-being. ILAR J 43(1):4–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bontrop RE (2001) Nonhuman primates: essential partners in biomedical research. Immunol Rev 183:5–9.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1830101.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan-Smith HM, Rennie AE, Vitale A, Pollo S, Prescott MJ, Morton DB (2005) Harmonising the definition of refinement. Anim Welf 14:379–384Google Scholar
  5. Capitanio JP, Emborg ME (2008) Contributions of non-human primates to neuroscience research. Lancet 371(9618):1126–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60489-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson HE, Schapiro SJ, Farah I, Hau J (2004) Use of primates in research: a global overview. Am J Primatol 63:225–237.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang FT, Hard LA (2002) Human-animal bonds in the laboratory: how animal behavior affects the perspective of caregivers. ILAR J 43(1):10–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman K (2011) Caring for non-human primates in biomedical research facilities: scientific, moral and emotional considerations. Am J Primatol 73:220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20855 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cyranoski D (2016) Monkeys genetically modified to show autism symptoms. Nature 529:449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis H (2002) Prediction and preparation: Pavlovian implications of research animals discriminating among humans. ILAR J 43(1):19–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de Cock Buning T (1995) What apes teach us about ethics. In: Corbey R, Theunissen B (eds) Ape, man, apeman: changing views since 1600. Leiden University Publishers, Leiden, pp 385–394Google Scholar
  12. Downey H, Ellis S (2008) Tails of animal attraction: incorporating the feline into the family. J Bus Res 61:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (1986) Council directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Off J L 358, 18/12/1986, p 1–28. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31986L0609:EN:HTML. Accessed 10 April 2016
  14. European Commission (2007) Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament. Fifth report on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union. Commission of the European Communities Brussels, 5/11/2007. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52007DC0675&from=EN. Accessed 10 April 2016
  15. European Commission (2010a) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off J Eur Union L 276, 20/10/2010, p 33–79. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063&from=EN. Accessed 10 April 2016
  16. European Commission (2010b) Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament. Sixth report on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union. European Commission, Brussels, 8/12/2010. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0511R(01)&from=EN. Accessed 10 April 2016
  17. European Commission (2013) Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament. Seventh report on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union. European Commission, Brussels, 5/12/2013. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0859&from=EN. Accessed 10 April 2016
  18. Evans DT, Silvestri G (2013) Nonhuman primate models in AIDS research. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 8:255–261.  https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e328361cee8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Garbarini N (2010) Primates as a model for research. Dis Model Mech 3:15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.004861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Geerts H, Spiros A, Roberts P, Twyman R, Alphs L, Grace AA (2012) Blinded prospective evaluation of computer-based mechanistic schizophrenia disease model for predicting drug response. PLoS One 7(12):e49732.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049732 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagelin J (2004) Use of live nonhuman primates in research in Asia. J Postgrad Med 50(4):253–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartung T (2010) Comparative analysis of the revised directive 2010/63/EU for the protection of laboratory animals with its predecessor 86/609/EEC – a t4 report. ALTEX 27(4):285–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Herzog H (2002) Ethical aspects of relationships between humans and research animals. ILAR J 43(1):27–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Herzog H (2011) Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: why it’s so hard to think straight about animals. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Iliff SA (2002) An additional “R”: remembering the animals. ILAR J 43(1):38–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jellen LC, Aliper A, Budzin A, Zhavoronkov A (2015) Screening and personalizing nootropic drugs and cognitive modulator regimens in silico. Front Syst Neurosci 9:4.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu Z, Nie YH, Zhang CC, Cai YJ, Wang Y, Lu HP, Li YZ, Cheng C, Qiu ZL, Sun Q (2016) Generation of macaques with sperm derived from juvenile monkey testicular xenografts. Cell Res 26(1):139.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marais E (1968) The soul of the ape. Atheneum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers DD (2012) Nonhuman primate models of thrombosis. Thromb Res 129(2):S65–S69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nature Editorial (2008) Call to action: European scientists who support neuroscience research on primates should tell their politicians why. Nature 456:281–282Google Scholar
  31. Perretta G (2011) Uso dei primati nella ricerca scientifica alla luce della nuova Direttiva. In: Manciocco A, Romano E, Zoratto F, Branchi I, Berry A (eds) Sperimentazione animale: aspetti teorici, normativi e applicativi della nuova Direttiva europea 2010/63. Rapporti ISTISAN 11/39, pp 20–26Google Scholar
  32. Prescott MJ, Buchanan-Smith HM (2003) Training nonhuman primates using positive reinforcement techniques. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 6(3):157–161.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0603_01 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rennie AE, Buchanan-Smith HM (2005) Report on the extent and character of primate use in scientific procedures across Europe in 2001. Lab Primate Newsl 44(2):6–12Google Scholar
  34. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959, reprinted 1992) The principles of humane experimental technique. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, WheathampstaedGoogle Scholar
  35. SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks) (2009) Scientific opinion on the need for non-human primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/pdf/scher_o_110.pdf
  36. SCHEER (Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks) (2017) Final opinion on ‘the need for non-human primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices (update 2017)’. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/scheer/docs/scheer_o_004.pdf
  37. Serpell J (1996) In the company of animals: a study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Schapiro SJ, Perlman JE, Thiele E, Lambeth S (2005) Training non-human primates to perform behaviours useful in biomedical research. Lab Anim 34:37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0505-37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer P, Cavalieri P (eds) (1993) The great ape project: equality beyond humanity. Fourth Estate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Strum SC, Fedigan LM (eds) (2000) Primate encounters: models of science, gender, and society. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi-Omoe H, Omoe K (2007) Animal experimentation in Japan: regulatory processes and application for microbiological studies. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 30(4):225–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2007.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. United States Department of Agriculture (2015) United States department of agriculture, animal and plant health inspection service. Annual report animal usage by fiscal year (2014). https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/7023/Animals%20Used%20In%20Research%202014.pdf
  43. Vitale A (2011) Primatology between feelings and science: a personal experience perspective. Am J Primatol 73:214–219.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20863 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vitale A, Pollo S (2011) Introduction to the special section: “The effects of bonds between human and nonhuman primates on primatological research and practice”. Am J Primatol 73(3):211–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Yagami K, Mashimo T, Sekiguchi F, Sugiyama F, Yamamura K, Serikawa T (2010) Survey of live laboratory animals reared in Japan. Exp Anim 59(4):531–535.  https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim59.531 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Behavioral Sciences and Mental HealthIstituto Superiore di SanitàRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations