Hassan Fathy, Aldo van Eyck and Bernard Rudofsky Drawing Architecture

  • Alejandro Campos UribeEmail author
  • Paula Lacomba Montes
Conference paper


This article analyses the drawings of the Egyptian architect Hassan Fathy, the Dutch architect Aldo van Eyck and the Czech architect Bernard Rudofsky as three ways of representing architecture. It presents a comparative study of their graphic approaches as a basis to understand their built works. On the one hand, Fathy’s drawings do not seek to represent spaces, but rather to invent new ways of living. They are full of symbols, like a juxtaposition from different points of view that captures the key aspects of the place in which the architecture evolves. They show us a land of contrasts, with intense light from a radiant sun and deep shadows that create a sense of home. In contrast, Van Eyck’s drawings are a collection of indications that seem to affix thoughts onto paper. The lines and colours, accompanied by words, make up a truly visual text that does not attempt to technically describe the building, but creates a sort of instruction manual for the layout of objects on a surface. Lastly, Bernard Rudofsky does not propose with his drawings a new way of constructing architecture, but a new mode of living. For this reason he fills his images with individuals carrying out specific actions, explaining through their movements the suggested uses of the spaces. The three styles of drawing show, ultimately, three different ways to understand the profession: from Fathy’s ambiences shaped by tradition and natural forces, to Van Eyck’s montages of autonomous fragments, to Rudofsky’s investigations of new modes of living. In all cases, drawing is now, truly, creating architecture.


Aldo van Eyck Hassan Fathy Bernard Rudofsky Representing architecture 


  1. Berger J (2014) La Apariencia de Las Cosas. Gustavo Gili, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  2. Fathy H (1973) Architecture for the poor. An experiment in rural Egypt. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamid A (2010) Hassan Fathy and continuity in Islamic architecture. The birth of a new modern. The American University in Cairo Press, El CairoGoogle Scholar
  4. Merleau-Ponty M (1964) Eye and mind. In: The primacy of perception. Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Quetglas J (1999) Pasado a limpio, I. Editorial Pre-Textos, GeronaGoogle Scholar
  6. Rudofsky B (1955) Behind the picture window. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Rudofsky B, Bocco Guarneri A (2003) Bernard Rudofsky, a Humane Designer. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  8. Strauven F (1998) Aldo van Eyck: the shape of relativity. Architectura & Natura Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. van Eyck A (1999) Aldo van Eyck: works. Birkhäuser Verlag, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. van Eyck A (2008a) Collected articles and other writings 1947–1998, vol 1. Sun Publishers, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  11. van Eyck A (2008b) The child, the city and the artist: an essay on architecture: the in-between realm, vol II. Sun Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Proyectos ArquitectónicosUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations