Reflections on Collective Learning: Open and Closed
This chapter contains reflections on the outcomes of a collaborative action research programme, the Local Sustainability Project (LSP), Australian National University, 1995–2015. The aim of the LSP was to support whole-of-community change towards a sustainable future. The Project team conducted over 300 workshops using collective learning as the vehicle for community-wide change. Project participants came from parties interested in the proposed change. The workshops were held across four continents, using a framework adapted from David Kolb’s long-established experiential learning cycle: first ideals, then facts, followed by ideas and action.
There were three rounds of workshops. Each round built on learning from the one before. In the first round, workshop participants were drawn from those with an interest in the change. In the workshops, the principal conflicts were not over the issues themselves; rather, they were between knowledge sub-cultures (individual, community, specialized, organizational and holistic) each with its own language, content and methods of inquiry. Loyalty to knowledge sub-cultures meant that the learning process was closed and participants were resistant to thinking about the whole.
In the third round of workshops, participants from the vested interest groups and knowledge sub-cultures were invited as individuals, and asked to contribute based on their personal ways of thinking. These ways of thinking proved to be physical, social, ethical, aesthetic and sympathetic, and as a result they established each individual as a collective thinker in their own right. Final reflections found individual collective learning open to the creativity and insight required to redress the closed biases of the vested interests and the silos of the knowledge subcultures.
KeywordsCollective learning Collective thinking Individual thinking Knowledge sub-cultures Collective learning workshops Action research
My thanks to my long-time collaborator, John Harris, writing group members Craig Ashurst, Diana Dibley and David Marsh and two anonymous referees for their valuable contributions to this paper.
- Adam, B., Van Loon, J., & Beck, U. (2000). The risk society and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Aslin, H., & Brown, V. A. (2004). Towards whole of community engagement. A practical toolkit. Canberra: Murray Darling Basin Commission.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1973). Steps towards an ecology of mind. Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. St. Albans: Paladin.Google Scholar
- Berlin, I. (1967). The hedgehog and the fox. An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
- Berlin, I. (1997). The hedgehog and the fox. In The proper study of mankind (p. 436). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Boyden, S., Millar, S., Newcombe, K., & O’Neill, B. (1981). The ecology of a city and its people: The case of Hong Kong. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, L. (2005). Vital signs. Washington, DC: World Watch Institute.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. A. (2008). Leonardo’s vision: A guide to collective thinking and action. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. A. (2015). Utopian thinking and the collective mind: Beyond transdisciplinarity. Futures Journal, 65. Advances in Transdisciplinarity 2004–2014, 209–216.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. A., & Harris, J. A. (2014). The human capacity for transformational change: harnessing the collective mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. A., & Lambert, J. A. (2012). Collective learning for transformational change. A handbook for action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Brown, V.A., Harris, J.A. and Russel, J. Y. (2010). Tackling Wicked Problems through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L. (1972/1992). Anthem. In The future. New York: Sony.Google Scholar
- Fleck, L. (1979). The genesis and development of scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Friedman, T. L. (2000). The lexus and the olive tree. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin (orig. 1970).Google Scholar
- Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, C. (2017). Defiant earth. The fate of humans in the Anthropocene. Crow’s Nest, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Hancock, T. (2016) Governance for health in the Anthropocene, Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. (1964). Man and his symbols. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Local Sustainability Project. (1995–2015). Canberra: Fenner School of Science and Society, Australian National University.Google Scholar
- Midgley , M. (1990). The myths we live by. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Nowotny H., Scott P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Passmore, J. (1970). The perfectibility of man. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar