Advertisement

Small-Size Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: An Environmental Sustainability Analysis via LCA

  • Pasqua L’AbbateEmail author
  • Michele Dassisti
  • Abdul G. Olabi
Chapter
  • 469 Downloads
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Electrical energy production from renewable sources has dramatically grown in the recent years in the developed countries, putting the hard problem to be solved of supply discontinuity. How to reach high efficiency and reliability of electrical energy storage system is thus now one of the most challenging goals to be reached: among all, one of the most simple and widespread to use is the electrochemical storage systems. This paper analyzes the sustainability of a small vanadium redox flow battery performed by an LCA approach. This electrical energy storage system was selected for its significant advantages in use, such as the almost infinite lifetime of the vanadium electrolytes, which represent a potentially significant advantage in terms of a sustainable future made of less fossil fuels and more renewable energy. In fact, the LCA analysis performed shows that the production of the battery has a moderate impact, including the effect toxicity while at the end of life, the material and the electrolyte are completely reusable with a small fraction that goes to landfill disposal.

Keywords

Vanadium redox flow battery LCA Electrical energy storage Renewable energy sources Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Duferco Project from Inreslab s.c.a.r.l. Monopoli for partially supporting the present analysis. This work  has been published under the moral patronage of the SOSTENERE group of the AITEM (www.aitem.org)

References

  1. Alotto P, Guarnieri M, Moro F (2014) Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:325–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbabzadeh M et al (2015) Vanadium redox flow batteries to reach greenhouse gas emissions targets in an off-grid configuration. Appl Energy 146:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolozzi M (1989) Development of redox flow batteries. A historical bibliography. J Power Sources 27:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaudin M, Zareipour H, Schellenberglabe A, Rosehart W (2010) Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: an updated review. Energy Sustain Dev 14:302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H, Cong TN, Yang W et al (2009) Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review. Prog Nat Sci 19:291–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunha A, Martins J, Rodrigues N, Brito FP (2015) Vanadium redox flow batteries: a technology review. Int J Energy Res 39:889e918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dassisti M, Mastrorilli P, Rizzuti A, L’Abbate P, Cozzolino G, Chimienti M (2015) LCA of in-house producED SMAll-SIZED vanadium redox-flow batterY. State Art Energy Dev 11:232Google Scholar
  8. Dassisti M, Mastrorilli P, Rizzuti A, Cozzolino G, Chimienti M, Olabi AG, Matera F, Carbone A (2016) Vanadium: a transition metal for sustainable energy storing in redox flow batteries. In: Saleem H (editor-in-chief) Reference module in materials science and materials engineering. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–24. ISBN 978-0-12-803581-8Google Scholar
  9. Dell RM, Rand DA (2001) Energy storage—a key technology for global energy sustainability. J Power Sources 100:2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Heck T, Hellweg S et al (2007) Ecoinvent v2.0: overview and methodology. Dübendorf, Switzerland: swiss Centre for Life Cycle In- ventories. Technical Report No. 1 EcoinventGoogle Scholar
  11. Giner J, Swette L, Cahill K (1976) Screening of redox couples and electrode materialsGoogle Scholar
  12. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Schryver AD, Struijs J, Zelm RV (2009) “ReCiPe 2008.” A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, 1,Netherlands, 2009, 1−126Google Scholar
  13. Guinee JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:311e3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiremath M, Derendorf K, Vogt T (2015) Comparative life cycle assessment of battery storage systems for stationary applications. Environ Sci Technol 49:4825–4833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibrahim H, Ilinca A, Perron J (2008) Energy storage systems—characteristics and comparisons. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(5):1221–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Electrotechnical Commission (2012) White paper electrical energy storage. https://www.iec.ch/whitepaper/energystorage/?ref=gspromo
  17. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14040 standard (2006a) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
  18. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14044 standard (2006b) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  19. Jolliet O et al (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jungbluth N, Tuchschmid M, de Wild-Scholten M (2008) Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaics: update of ecoinvent data V2. 0. ESU-services LtdGoogle Scholar
  21. Kear G, Shah AA, Walsh FC (2012) Development of the all-vanadium redox flow battery for energy storage: a review of technological, financial and policy aspects. Int J Energy Res 36:1105–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Zhang H, Mai Z, Zhang H, Vankelecom I (2011) Ion exchange membranes for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) applications. Energy Environ Sci 4(4):1147–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liyu L, Kim S, Wang W, Vijayakumar M, Nie Z, Chen B et al (2011) A stable vanadium redox-flow battery with high energy density for large-scale energy storage. Adv Energy Mater 1:394e400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100008
  24. Nehrir MH, Wang C, Strunz K, Aki H, Ramakumar R, Bing J, Nehrir Z (2011) A review of hybrid renewable/alternative energy systems for electric power generation: configurations, control, and applications. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2(4):392–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 31(1):55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poullikkas A (2013) A comparative overview of large-scale battery systems for electricity storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27:778–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum RK et al (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rydh CJ (1999) Environmental assessment of vanadium redox and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage. J Power Sources 80(1–2):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rydh CJ, Sandén BA (2005) Energy analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems. Part I: performance and energy requirements. Energy Convers Manage 46(11–12):1957–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skyllas-Kazacos M, Kazacos G, Poon G, Verseema H (2010) Recent advances with UNSW vanadium-based redox flow batteries. Int J Energy Res 34(2):182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tang Ao et al (2012) Thermal modelling and simulation of the all-vanadium redox flow battery. J Power Sources 203:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Unterreiner L, Jülch V, Reith S (2016) Recycling of battery technologies—ecological impact analysis using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Energy Proced 99:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber AZ, Mench MM, Meyers JP, Ross PN, Gostick JT, Liu Q (2011) Redox flow batteries: a review. J Appl Electrochem 41(10):1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jungbluth, Niels, Matthias Tuchschmid, and Mariska de Wild-Scholten. "Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaics: update of ecoinvent data V2. 0." ESU-services Ltd (2008).Google Scholar
  35. Goedkoop, M.; Heijungs, R.; Huijbregts, M.; Schryver, A. D.; Struijs, J.; Zelm, R. V. ReCiPe 2008; Netherlands, 2009, 1−126Google Scholar
  36. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Heck T, Hellweg S et al. (2007) Ecoinvent v2.0: Overview and methodology. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle In- ventories. Technical Report Ecoinvent No. 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasqua L’Abbate
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michele Dassisti
    • 2
  • Abdul G. Olabi
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental, Building Engineering and ChemistryPolytechnic of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mechanics, Management and MathematicsPolytechnic University of BariBariItaly
  3. 3.Sustainable and Renewable Energy EngineeringUniversity of SharjahSharjahUAE
  4. 4.Mechanical Engineering and Design, School of Engineering and Applied ScienceAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations