Advertisement

Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing and Target Setting in Highly Automated Production

  • Jan-Markus Rödger
  • Niki Bey
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management book series (SPLCEM)

Abstract

The interest in sustainability in manufacturing is growing. The European Commission elaborated in collaboration with the European Factories of the Future Research Association (EFFRA) a road map until 2030. The revised ISO 14001 standard, released end of 2015, emphasizes the integration of a life cycle perspective in production. External stakeholders like the Carbon Disclosure Project are striving for very detailed sustainability-related information. Therefore, this chapter will describe the latest approaches of how to assess sustainability in manufacturing, how production planning works in automated production and how sustainability thinking might be integrated in a feasible way. Additionally, a new framework is described which is able to link and allocate the product-related life cycle emissions in a consistent way from the large context down to the individual machine tool level in manufacturing. In essence, this chapter points out that efforts in manufacturing improvements need to be done with a view on entire systems rather than with a view only on single “island solutions”—and it shows a way how to do this.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement No. 609391 (AREUS).

References

  1. Amrina E, Yusof SM (2011) Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, pp 1093–1097Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin JS, Allen PM, Winder B, Ridgway K (2005) Modelling manufacturing evolution: thoughts on sustainable industrial development. J Clean Prod 13(9):887–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BDEW (2013) BDEW-Strompreisanalyse Mai 2013, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellgran M, Säfsten K (2010) Production development. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benoït Norris C, Revéret J-P (2014) Partial organization and social LCA development: the creation and expansion of an epistemic community. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment, vol. 6, no. 7. Springer, Singapore, Heidelberg, New York, Hong Kong, pp 4200–4226Google Scholar
  6. Benoït Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulisio D (2013) the methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). UNEPGoogle Scholar
  7. Bey N, Hauschild MZ, McAloone TC (2013) Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørn A, Hauschild MZ (2013) Absolute versus relative environmental sustainability: what can the cradle-to-cradle and eco-efficiency concepts learn from each other? Bjørn and Hauschild cradle to cradle versus eco-efficiency. J Ind Ecol 17(2):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and servicesGoogle Scholar
  11. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkman TJ, Rödger J-M, Bey N (2015) Managing the life cycle of production equipment : what does it matter ? In: LCM conference BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  13. Drechsel M, Bornschlegl M, Hackbarth D (2015) The value and necessity of using environmental direct comparisons as a simplified life cycle assessment method in industrial planning processes. In: Electric drives production conference & exhibitionGoogle Scholar
  14. Du C, Freire F, Dias L (2015) Overview of social life cycle assessment. In: Life cycle in practiceGoogle Scholar
  15. Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild M, Kellens K (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):587–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EFFRA (2013) Factories of the future. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. EU JRC (2014) Guidance for the implementation of the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) during the Environmental Footprint (EF) pilot phase, pp 1–55Google Scholar
  18. EU (2014) No 443/2009 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars, pp 15–21, Mar 2014Google Scholar
  19. Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frischknecht R, Flury K (2011) Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges—Zurich, April 6, 2011. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galitsky C, Worrell E (2008) Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the vehicle assembly industry, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Garetti M, Taisch M (2012) Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Prod Plan Control 23(2–3):83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graedel T, Allenby BR (1995) Industrial ecology, vol 20, no 4. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  24. Hauschild MZ (2005) Assessing environmental impacts in a life-cycle perspective. Environ Sci Technol 39(4):81A–88ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heil U, Paulus I, Schacht M (2014) Karosseriebautage Hamburg, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  26. Helmers E, Marx P (2012) Electric cars: technical characteristics and environmental impacts. Environ Sci Eur 24(14):1–15Google Scholar
  27. Herrmann C (2010) Ganzheitliches Life Cycle Management. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoekstra A (2010) The water footprint : water in the supply chain. Environmentalist (93):12–13Google Scholar
  29. Hoekstra Y, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(9):3232–3237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IFR (2013) Executive Summary 1. World Robotics 2013 Industrial Robots 2. World Robotics 2013 Service Robots 3. World Robotics 2013 Industrial Robots. World Robotics Report—Executive Summary, pp 10–21Google Scholar
  31. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
  32. Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS (2010) Developing the social life cycle assessment: addressing issues of validity and usability. Dissertation, Feb 2010Google Scholar
  33. Klüger P (2013) Future body-in-white concepts increased sustainability with reduced investment and life cycle costsGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD/IEA (2012) Technology roadmap—fuel economy of road vehicles, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity (html). Ecol Soc 14(2)Google Scholar
  36. Rödger J-M, Bey N, Alting L (2016) The sustainability cone—a holistic framework to integrate sustainability thinking into manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol (submitted)Google Scholar
  37. Schlick T, Bernhart W (2013) The development of e-mobility in global markets. In: IAA 2013Google Scholar
  38. Schrettle S, Hinz A, Scherrer-Rathje M, Friedli T (2014) Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 147:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell S, Fetzer I, Bennett E, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Wit CA, Folke C, Mace G, Persson LM, Veerabhadran R, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, prep, Jan 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thiede S (2012) Sustainable production. In: Life cycle engineering. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  41. Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol 16(5):680–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. UNEP/SETAC (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiativeGoogle Scholar
  43. VDI (2008) Digitale Fabrik Grundlagen Digital factory Fundamentals VDI 4499. SystemGoogle Scholar
  44. Warhurst A (2002) Sustainability indicators and sustainability performance management 43(43)Google Scholar
  45. World Bank (2011a) data.worldbank.org. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS. Accessed 26 June 2014
  46. World Bank (2011b) Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.ZS

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management EngineeringTechnical University of Denmark (DTU)Kongens LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations