Advertisement

A Diagnostic Method for Axle Counting Systems Based on the SNMP Protocol

  • Waldemar NowakowskiEmail author
  • Piotr Bojarczak
  • Zbigniew Łukasik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 222)

Abstract

The railway traffic control systems’ development arise from the need to ensure, by these systems, a high level of safety and reliability, and a required functionality. It is linked with the use of technical achievements in constructing new devices and systems. This means that contemporary railway traffic control systems are computer systems, using modern ICT systems. Thanks to this fact, new possibilities for the diagnosis of these systems arise, as well as maintenance and diagnostics centres are created. At the moment, there are no standards regarding the way and range of collecting diagnostic data. That is why, the authors of the paper have proposed a method for diagnostic data collection, consisting in using SNMP, which is commonly used in the diagnosis of computer networks. The research has been conducted for one of the railway traffic control systems – the Axle Counting Systems (ACS). Therefore, two MIB bases, in which diagnostic data structure was defined, have been developed, as well as software of the SNMP agent and manager has been worked out. The SNMP agent allows modification of data concerning the axle counting system and it makes the data available to the SNMP manager. It also has an implemented function to notify the manager about faults in the form of sent traps. The conducted experimental research has proven usefulness of this technology, and, at the same time, the need to extend the research to include other types of the railway traffic control systems.

Keywords

Railway traffic control systems ACS Diagnostic method SNMP MIB 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by National Centre for Research and Development under Grant No. PBS3/A6/29/2015 entitled “The system for maintenance data acquisition and analysis of reliability and safety of traffic control systems”.

References

  1. 1.
    Kara, T., Savas, M.C.: Design and simulation of a decentralized railway traffic control system. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 6(2), 945–951 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chrzan, M., Nowakowski, W., Sobiczewski, W.: Współczesne systemy prowadzenia ruchu pociągów na przykładzie linii E–20. Technika Transportu Szynowego nr 9 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia, M., Fausto, P., Pedregal, D.J., Roberts, C.: New methods for the condition monitoring of level crossings. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 46(5), 878–884 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Łukasik, Z., Nowakowski, W.: Application of TTCN-3 for testing of railway interlocking systems. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) TST 2010. CCIS, vol. 104, pp. 447–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16472-9_49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldoni, R., Montanari, L., Rizzut, M.: On-line failure prediction in safety-critical systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 45, 123–132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimes, G., Adley, B.P.: Intelligent agents for network fault diagnosis and testing. In: Lazar, A.A., Saracco, R., Stadler, R. (eds.) Integrated Network Management V. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 232–244. Springer, Boston (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35180-3_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hood, C.S., Ji, C.Y.: Proactive network-fault detection. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 46(3), 333–341 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durmus, M.S., Ustoglu, I., Tsarev, R.Y., et al.: Modular fault diagnosis in fixed-block railway signaling systems. In: 14th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems (CTS), Istanbul, Turkey (2016). IFAC Papersonline 49(3), 459–464 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mascardi, V., Briola, D., Martelli, M., et al.: Monitoring and diagnosing railway signalling with logic-based distributed agents. In: International Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems (CISIS), Genoa, Italy (2008). Adv. Soft Comput. 53, 108–115 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pniewski, R., Kornaszewski, M., Chrzan, M.: Safety of electronic ATC systems in the aspect of technical and operational. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences, Part IV, pp. 1729–1735 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Łukasik, Z., Ciszewski, T., Młyńczak, J., Nowakowski, W., Wojciechowski, J.: Assessment of the safety of microprocessor-based semi-automatic block signalling system. In: Macioszek, E., Sierpiński, G. (eds.) Contemporary Challenges of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering. LNNS, vol. 2, pp. 137–144. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43985-3_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nowakowski, W., Łukasik, Z., Bojarczak, P.: Technical safety in the process of globalization. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences, Part IV, pp. 1571–1578 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duarte, E.P., dos Santos, A.L.: Network fault management based on SNMP agent groups. In: Proceedings of 21st IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Phoenix, USA, pp. 51–56 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Su, M.S., Thulasiraman, K., Das, A.: A scalable on-line multilevel distributed network fault detection/monitoring system based on the SNMP protocol. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 02), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1960–1964 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stallings, W.: SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3, and RMON 1 and 2, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, ‎Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mauro, D., Schmidt, K.: Essential SNMP, 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walsh L.: SNMP MIB Handbook, Essential Guide to MIB Development, Use and Diagnosis. Wyndham Press (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Łukasik, Z., Nowakowski, W.: ASN.1 notation for exchange of data in computer-based railway control systems. Transp. Prob. 4(2), 111–116 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waldemar Nowakowski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Piotr Bojarczak
    • 1
  • Zbigniew Łukasik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Transport and Electrical EngineeringKazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in RadomRadomPoland

Personalised recommendations