Advertisement

Measuring Social Responsiveness for Improved Handling of Extreme Situations

  • Nikolay Butakov
  • Timur Fatkulin
  • Daniil Voloshin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10860)

Abstract

Volunteering and community reaction is known to be an essential part of response to critical events. Rapid evolution and emergence of the new means of communication allowed even further expansion of these practices via the medium of the social networks. A new category of volunteers emerged – those that are not in the proximity to the area of emergency but willing to help the affected. Widely known as digital volunteers, they help aggregate, disseminate and distribute information to increase and maintain the awareness of stakeholders and resourceful individuals about the situation. There has been an upsurge of investigations of roles, timelines and aggregate characteristics of emergent communication. Compared to that, characteristics of crisis-related social media posts that predict wider social response to date have been studied modestly. In this research we are studying the process of reaction of potential digital volunteers to different extreme situations in a social media platform.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research financially supported by Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Agreement #14.578.21.0196 (03.10.2016). Unique Identification RFMEFI57816X0196.

References

  1. 1.
    Simon, T., Goldberg, A., Adini, B.: Socializing in emergencies—a review of the use of social media in emergency situations. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35(5), 609–619 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Procopio, C.H., Procopio, S.T.: Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans? Internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 35(1), 67–87 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palen, L., Liu, S.B.: Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 727–736 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, S.E.: Sandy marked a shift for social media use in disasters. Emerg. Manag. (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reuter, C., Ludwig, T., Kaufhold, M.-A., Spielhofer, T.: Emergency services’ attitudes towards social media: a quantitative and qualitative survey across Europe. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 95, 96–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stallings, R.A., Quarantelli, E.L.: Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Adm. Rev. 45, 93–100 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer, D., Posegga, O., Fischbach, K.: Communication barriers in crisis management: a literature review. In: ECIS, 2016, Research Paper 168 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sobiegalla, F., Posegga, O., Fischbach, K.: Evaluating a mobile crisis response system for the management of disaster volunteers. In: Designing the Digital Transformation: DESRIST 2017 Research in Progress, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. Karlsruhe, Germany, 30 May–1 June 2017Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., Handmer, J.: A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: definition, opportunities and challenges. Int. J. disaster risk Reduct. 13, 358–368 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fishwick, C.: Tomnod–the online search party looking for Malaysian Airlines flight MH370. Guard 14, 37 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meier, P.: Human computation for disaster response. In: Michelucci, P. (ed.) Handbook of Human Computation, pp. 95–104. Springer, New York (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8806-4_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Starbird, K., Palen, L.: Voluntweeters: self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1071–1080 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reuter, C., Heger, O., Pipek, V.: Combining real and virtual volunteers through social media. In: ISCRAM (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ukkusuri, S., Zhan, X., Sadri, A., Ye, Q.: Use of social media data to explore crisis informatics: study of 2013 Oklahoma Tornado. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2459, 110–118 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Purohit, H., Hampton, A., Bhatt, S., Shalin, V.L., Sheth, A.P., Flach, J.M.: Identifying seekers and suppliers in social media communities to support crisis coordination. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 23(4–6), 513–545 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandari, R., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: The pulse of news in social media: forecasting popularity. ICWSM 12, 26–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vorontsov, K., Frei, O., Apishev, M., Romov, P., Dudarenko, M.: BigARTM: open source library for regularized multimodal topic modeling of large collections. In: International Conference on Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts, pp. 370–381 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geurts, P., Ernst, D., Wehenkel, L.: Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63(1), 3–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Breiman, L.: Random forest. Mach. Learn. 45(5), 1–35 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Butakov, N., Petrov, M., Radice, A.: Multitenant approach to crawling of online social networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 101, 115–124 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolay Butakov
    • 1
  • Timur Fatkulin
    • 1
  • Daniil Voloshin
    • 1
  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations