Advertisement

Fidelity Perception of 3D Models on the Web

  • Hussein Bakri
  • Alan Miller
  • Iain Oliver
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 840)

Abstract

Cultural heritage artefacts act as a gateway helping people learn about their social traditions and history. However, preserving these artefacts faces many difficulties, including potential destruction or damage from global warming, wars and conflicts, and degradation from day-to-day use. In addition, artefacts can only be present in one place at a time, and many of them can not be exhibited due to the limited physical space of museums. The digital domain offers opportunities to capture and represent the form and texture of these artefacts and to overcome the previously mentioned constraints by allowing people to access and interact with them on multiple platforms (mobile devices, tablets and personal computers) and network regimes. Through two experiments we study the subjective perception of the fidelity of 3D models in web browsers in order to discover perceptible resolution thresholds. This helps us create models of reasonable graphical complexity that could be fetched on the biggest range of end devices. It also enables us to design systems which efficiently optimise the user experience by adapting their behaviour based upon user perception, model characteristics and digital infrastructure.

Keywords

3D Web Heritage Perception Fidelity QoE 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Jane Brooks and Mary Carr from ELT, University of St Andrews, for helping out in the proof reading and language of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Brunnström, K., Beker, S.A., De Moor, K., Dooms, A., Egger, S., et al.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience Output from the fifth Qualinet meeting, Novi Sad, 12 March 2013 (2013). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00977812. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00977812/file/QoE_whitepaper_v1.2.pdf
  2. 2.
    Schweibenz, W.: The virtual museum: new perspectives for museums to present objects and information using the internet as a knowledge base and communication system. ISI 34, 185–200 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bearman, D.: Interactive multimedia in museums. In: Studies in Multimedia: State-of-the-Art Solutions in Multimedia and Hypermedia, pp. 121–137 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Remondino, F.: Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens. 3(6), 1104–1138 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Böhler, W., Marbs, A.: 3D scanning and photogrammetry for heritage recording: a comparison. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp. 291–298. Gavle University Press, Sweden (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pavlidis, G., et al.: Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Heritage 8(1), 93–98 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OSG.JS WebGL Framework. http://osgjs.org/. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
  8. 8.
    Di Benedetto, M., et al.: SpiderGL: a JavaScript 3D graphics library for next-generation WWW. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Web 3D Technology, pp. 165–174. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakri, H., Allison, C., Miller, A., Oliver, I.: Virtual worlds and the 3D web – time for convergence? In: Allison, C., Morgado, L., Pirker, J., Beck, D., Richter, J., Gütl, C. (eds.) iLRN 2016. CCIS, vol. 621, pp. 29–42. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41769-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zampoglou, M., Kapetanakis, K., Stamoulias, A., Malamos, A.G., Panagiotakis, S.: Adaptive streaming of complex Web 3D scenes based on the MPEG-DASH standard. Multimedia Tools Appl. 77(1), 125–148 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavoué, G., Chevalier, L., Dupont, F.: Streaming compressed 3D data on the web using JavaScript and WebGL. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, pp. 19–27. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo, J., et al.: Subjective and objective visual quality assessment of textured 3D meshes. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP) 14(2), 11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanhoey, K., et al.: Visual quality assessment of 3D models: on the influence of light-material interaction. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP) 15(1), 5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corsini, M., et al.: Watermarked 3-D mesh quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 9(2), 247–256 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pan, Y., Cheng, I., Basu, A.: Quality metric for approximating subjective evaluation of 3-D objects. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 7(2), 269–279 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watson, B., Friedman, A., McGaffey, A.: Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 213–220. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogowitz, B.E., Rushmeier, H.E.: Are image quality metrics adequate to evaluate the quality of geometric objects? In: Photonics West 2001-Electronic Imaging, pp. 340–348. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Talens-Noguera, J.V., Liu, H.: Studying the perceived quality variation over time for video quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Perception Inspired Video Processing, pp. 35–36. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ITUT Rec. P. 910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. In: International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pietroni, N., Tarini, M., Cignoni, P.: Almost isometric mesh parameterization through abstract domains. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16(4), 621–635 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cassidy, C.A., et al.: A digital museum infrastructure for preserving community collections from climate change. In: iLRN 2017 Coimbra (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lederer, S., Müller, C., Timmerer, C.: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP dataset. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Multimedia Systems Conference, pp. 89–94. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations