Advertisement

Facilitating Undergraduate Experimental Game Design: A Pilot Study with Celestial Harmony

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 840)

Abstract

Encouraging undergraduate students and other novices to engage with game design experimentation requires the creation of a space where they can research without fear of failure. Creating a safe space requires addressing the class format for both production and grades. We conducted a pilot study with a group in a capstone game design course, seeking to create this safe space for experimentation by framing our roles not as expert instructors but partners in learning, where we offered guidance and mentorship to the groups while retaining student autonomy in much of the game design decisions. In this paper, we identify three key strategies for making students feel more comfortable in an experimental space that is also integrated into a required course. These three strategies are: modifying the grading schema, encouraging rapid prototyping, and providing frequent feedback. Though this guide is focused on experimental game design, many of the lessons we describe could be applied to courses in other fields where experimentation or loosely-defined works are the objective.

Keywords

Experimental game design Project-based learning Partners in learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Churches, A.: Bloom’s taxonomy blooms digitally. Tech Learn. 1, 1–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Resnick, M., Rosenbaum, E.: Designing for tinkerability. In: Honey, M., Kanter, D.E. (eds.) Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, pp. 163–181 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    King, A.: From sage on the stage to guide on the side. Coll. Teach. 41(1), 30–35 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saulnier, B.M.: From “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side” revisited: (un)covering the content in the learner-centered information systems course. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 7(60), 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright, G.B.: Student-centered learning in higher education. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 23(1), 92–97 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morrison, C.D.: From ‘sage on the stage’ to ‘guide on the side’: a good start. Int. J. Sch. Teach. Learn. 8(1), 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    UCF Quality Enhancement Plan. http://undergrad.ucf.edu/whatsnext/qeparchive/. Accessed 08 Mar 2018
  8. 8.
    Kumar, S., Hsiao, J.K.: Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 7(1), 18–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, V.: Review article: enhancing employability: human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Hum. Relat. 63(2), 279–303 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barley, S.R., Kunda, G.: Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anthropy, A., Clark, N.: A Game Design Vocabulary: Exploring the Foundational Principles Behind Good Game Design. Pearson Education, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rock Band Website. http://www.rockband4.com/. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    Laurillard, D.: Teaching as a Design Science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barron, B.J., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D.: Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. J. Learn. Sci. 7(3–4), 271–311 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–5. AAAI Press, San Jose (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brathwaite, B., Schreiber, I.: Challenges for Game Designer–Non-digital Exercises for Video Game Designers. Cengage Learning, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sullivan, A., Smith, G.: Designing craft games. Interactions 24(1), 38–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lohmeyer, E.: Navigating haptic space in video games. Analog Game Stud. 3(4). http://analoggamestudies.org/2016/07/smoothsketch-or-navigating-haptic-space-in-the-video-game-composition/. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  20. 20.
    Carlsson, I., Choi, J., Pearce, C., Smith, G.: Designing eBee: a reflection on quilt-based game design. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 24–34. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Mergendoller, J., Markham, T., Ravitz, J., Larmer, J.: Pervasive management of projectbased learning. In: Evertson, C., Weinstein, S. (eds.) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, pp. 583–615. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ.: Principles, Policy Practice 5(1), 7–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2), 199–218 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwalbe, K.: Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning, Boston (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations