Advertisement

Using HMD-Based Immersive Virtual Environments in Primary/K-12 Education

  • Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz
  • Alexandre Moreira Nascimento
  • Romero Tori
  • Maria Isabel da Silva Leme
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 840)

Abstract

Head-mounted displays (HMD) are becoming more affordable and immersive content more available. Consequently, the home-use of fully immersive virtual environments (IVE) has the potential for increasing significantly in the years to come. Studies suggest that primary/K-12 education can largely benefit from IVE. The existing literature reviews about this topic are almost a decade old, when access to virtual reality was restricted or did not specifically focus on this education level and setting. In this context, this article presents a literature review about learning outcomes from using fully HMD-based IVE in primary/K-12 education. It highlights relevant studies, identifies gaps, and provides insights for future research.

Keywords

Virtual reality K-12 Primary education Immersive virtual environments Head-mounted display 

References

  1. 1.
    Kuntz, S., Cíger, J.: Low-cost and home-made immersive systems. Int. J. Virtual Real. 11, 9–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosedale, P.: Virtual reality: the next disruptor: a new kind of worldwide communication. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6, 48–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong, P.: Just How Big Is the Virtual Reality Market and Where Is It Going Next? (2017). https://www.forbes.com/sites/paularmstrongtech/2017/04/06/just-how-big-is-the-virtual-reality-market-and-where-is-it-going-next/#3a1
  4. 4.
    Brown, A., Green, T.: Virtual reality: low-cost tools and resources for the classroom. TechTrends 60, 517–519 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amin, A., Gromala, D., Tong, X., Shaw, C.: Immersion in cardboard VR compared to a traditional head-mounted display. In: Lackey, S., Shumaker, R. (eds.) VAMR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9740, pp. 269–276. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papachristos, N.M., Vrellis, I., Mikropoulos, T.A.: A comparison between oculus rift and a low-cost smartphone VR headset: immersive user experience and learning. In: 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 477–481 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rakkolainen, I., Raisamo, R., Turk, M., Höllerer, T., Palovuori, K.: Casual immersive viewing with smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, pp. 449–452 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Juarez, A., Schonenberg, W., Bartneck, C.: Implementing a low-cost CAVE system using the CryEngine2. Entertain. Comput. 1, 157–164 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mestre, D.R.: CAVE versus head-mounted displays: ongoing thoughts. Electron. Imaging 2017, 31–35 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardt, C., Tompkin, J., Halsey, J., Hertzmann, A., Starck, J., Wang, O.: Video for virtual reality. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Courses, p. 16 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van den Broeck, M., Kawsar, F., Schöning, J.: It’s all around you: exploring 360° video viewing experiences on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Multimedia Conference, pp. 762–768 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Argyriou, L., Economou, D., Bouki, V.: 360-degree interactive video application for cultural heritage education (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Lundblad, N., Jin, M.: The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. J. Learn. Sci. 17, 102–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.W.: What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41, 10–32 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wickens, C.D.: Virtual reality and education. In: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 842–847 (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bricken, M.: Virtual reality learning environments: potentials and challenges. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 25, 178–184 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dede, C.: Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 5910(323), 66–69 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dede, C.J., Jacobson, J., Richards, J.: Introduction: virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In: Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., Richards, J. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. SCI, pp. 1–16. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freina, L., Ott, M.: A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, p. 133 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dawley, L., Dede, C.: Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 723–734. Springer, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: a review of the research. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41, 33–55 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martin-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C.E., Añorbe-Diaz, B., González-Marrero, A.: Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13, 469–486 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., Almeida, L.: Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33, 471–488 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Immersive Education Inniative: Immersive Education. http://immersiveeducation.org/
  25. 25.
    Dede, C.: Introduction to virtual reality in education. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2, 7–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheung, A.C.K., Slavin, R.E.: The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 9, 88–113 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slavin, R., Smith, D.: The relationship between sample sizes and effect sizes in systematic reviews in education. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 31, 500–506 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Salzman, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, R.B., Chen, J.: A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 293–316 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fowler, C.: Virtual reality and learning: where is the pedagogy? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46, 412–422 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Youngblut, C.: Educational uses of virtual reality technology, Alexandria (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bailey, J.O., Bailenson, J.N.: Immersive virtual reality and the developing child. In: Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts, pp. 181–200. Elsevier (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salzman, M.C., Loftin, R.B., Dede, C., McGlynn, D.: ScienceSpace: lessons for designing immersive virtual realities. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 89–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikropoulos, T.A., Natsis, A.: Educational virtual environments: a ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Comput. Educ. 56, 769–780 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Merchant, Z., Goetz, E.T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Davis, T.J.: Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: a meta-analysis. Comput. Educ. 70, 29–40 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scornavacca, E., Barnes, S.J., Huff, S.L.: Mobile business research published in 2000–2004: emergence, current status, and future opportunities. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 635–646 (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jones, O., Gatrell, C.: The future of writing and reviewing for IJMR. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 16, 249–264 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Booth, A., Sutton, A., Papaioannou, D.: Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage, London (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shoaib, M., Hussain, I., Mirza, H.T., Tayyab, M.: The role of information and innovative technology for rehabilitation of children with autism: a systematic literature review. In: 2017 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), pp. 1–10 (2017)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lindgren, R., Johnson-Glenberg, M.: Emboldened by embodiment: six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educ. Res. 42, 445–452 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Koziupa, T., Birchfield, D., Li, K.: Games for learning in embodied mixed-reality environments: principles and results. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Games + Learning + Society Conference, pp. 129–137 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jacobson, J., Lewis, M.: Game engine virtual reality with CaveUT. Comput. (Long Beach, Calif.) 38, 79–82 (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jacobson, J., Holden, L.: The virtual Egyptian temple. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 4531–4536 (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 27, 339–345 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kaufmann, H.: Construct3D: an augmented reality application for mathematics and geometry education. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 656–657 (2002)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Freina, L., Bottino, R.: Immersion or non-immersion? That is the question. Is immersion useful in a spatial perspective taking task? In: Immersive Italy 6th European Immersive Education Summit, Padova, Italy (2016)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Adamo-Villani, N., Wright, K.: SMILE: an immersive learning game for deaf and hearing children. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Educators Program, p. 17. ACM, San Diego (2007)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zizza, C., Starr, A., Hudson, D., Nuguri, S.S., Calyam, P., He, Z.: Towards a social virtual reality learning environment in high fidelity. In: 2018 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 1–4 (2018)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bernardes, M., Barros, F., Simoes, M., Castelo-Branco, M.: A serious game with virtual reality for travel training with autism spectrum disorder. In: 2015 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation Proceedings (ICVR), pp. 127–128 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ehrlich, J., Munger, J.: Utilizing head mounted displays as a learning tool for children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Immersive European Summit, Vienna (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Anderson, J.R.: Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol. Rev. 89, 369–406 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schunk, D.H.: Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Passig, D.: Revisiting the Flynn effect through 3D immersive virtual reality (IVR). Comput. Educ. 88, 327–342 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gelsomini, M.: An affordable virtual reality learning framework for children with neuro-developmental disorder. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 343–344. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rasheed, F., Onkar, P., Narula, M.: Immersive virtual reality to enhance the spatial awareness of students. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on HCI, IndiaHCI 2015, pp. 154–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tamaddon, K., Stiefs, D.: Embodied experiment of levitation in microgravity in a simulated virtual reality environment for science learning. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual and Augmented Reality (KELVAR), pp. 1–5 (2017)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Salzman, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, B.R.: Learner-centered design of sensorily immersive microworlds using a virtual reality interface. In: Greer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 554–564 (2005)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Häfner, P., Häfner, V., Ovtcharova, J.: Experiencing physical and technical phenomena in schools using virtual reality driving simulator. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8524, pp. 50–61. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Salzman, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, R.B.: Usability and learning in educational virtual realities. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 486–490 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Adamo-Villani, N., Wilbur, R.B.: Effects of platform (immersive versus non-immersive) on usability and enjoyment of a virtual learning environment for deaf and hearing children. In: Proceedings of EGVE, pp. 8–19 (2008)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Passig, D., Eden, S., Heled, M.: The impact of virtual reality on the awareness of teenagers to social and emotional experiences of immigrant classmates. Educ. Inf. Technol. 12, 267–280 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Parmar, D., Isaac, J., Babu, S.V., D’Souza, N., Leonard, A.E., Jörg, S., Gundersen, K., Daily, S.B.: Programming moves: design and evaluation of applying embodied interaction in virtual environments to enhance computational thinking in middle school students. In: 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 131–140 (2016)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Casu, A., Spano, L.D., Sorrentino, F., Scateni, R.: RiftArt: bringing masterpieces in the classroom through immersive virtual reality. In: Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, pp. 77–84 (2015)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Passig, D., Eden, S.: Enhancing time-connectives with 3D immersive virtual reality (IVR). J. Educ. Comput. Res. 42, 307–325 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Huang, Y., Churches, L., Reilly, B.: A case study on virtual reality American football training. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Virtual Reality International Conference, p. 6 (2015)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eden, S., Passig, D.: Three-dimensionality as an effective mode of representation for expressing sequential time perception. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 36, 51–63 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Passig, D., Schwartz, T.: Solving conceptual and perceptual analogies with virtual reality among kindergarten children of immigrant families. Teach. Coll. Rec. 116, n2 (2014)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Passig, D., Tzuriel, D., Eshel-Kedmi, G.: Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D immersive virtual reality environments. Comput. Educ. 95, 296–308 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cheng, Y., Huang, C.-L., Yang, C.-S.: Using a 3D immersive virtual environment system to enhance social understanding and social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 30, 222–236 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Strickland, D., Marcus, L.M., Mesibov, G.B., Hogan, K.: Brief report: two case studies using virtual reality as a learning tool for autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 26, 651–659 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Passig, D., Eden, S.: Enhancing the induction skill of deaf and hard-of-hearing children with virtual reality technology. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 5, 277–285 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Passig, D., Eden, S.: Virtual reality as a tool for improving spatial rotation among deaf and hard-of-hearing children. CyberPsychol. Behav. 4, 681–686 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Passig, D.: Improving the sequential time perception of teenagers with mild to moderate mental retardation with 3D immersive virtual reality (IVR). J. Educ. Comput. Res. 40, 263–280 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Passis, D., Eden, S.: Improving flexible thinking in deaf and hard of hearing children with virtual reality technology. Am. Ann. Deaf 145, 286–291 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Passig, D., Eden, S.: Cognitive intervention through virtual environments among deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 18, 173–182 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.: Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 309–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P.L.: Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psychol. 74, 657 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A.C., Swinth, K.R., Hoyt, C.L., Bailenson, J.N.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol. Inq. 13, 103–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., Martinez-Pons, M.: Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29, 663–676 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lee, J.-S.: The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: is it a myth or reality? J. Educ. Res. 107, 177–185 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz
    • 1
  • Alexandre Moreira Nascimento
    • 2
  • Romero Tori
    • 2
  • Maria Isabel da Silva Leme
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology InstituteUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Polytechnic SchoolUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations