Advertisement

Energy Sensitive Spatial Planning as a Public Sector Tool Towards Sustainable Economic and Territorial Development

  • Elena Dimitrova
  • Milena Tasheva-Petrova
  • Angel Burov
  • Irina Mutafchiiska
Chapter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

By juxtaposing the research results of two recent research projects, the authors complement two perspectives on current energy sensitivity in Bulgarian spatial planning: (a) an “inside out”—energy efficiency considerations reflected in adopted municipal strategic spatial plans; and (b) an “outside in”—societal appreciation of the role of the local governance planning instruments in addressing energy-related challenges. Largely missing societal awareness about the potential of spatial planning for contributing to greater energy efficiency was identified alongside quite generally approached energy efficiency targets in the plans. The steps claimed urgent in the planning field are to: explicitly define the energy-related aspects addressed and the ways of integrating them into strategic planning documents; better communicate the topic with all the stakeholders in the urban process; and insist for broader support in building relevant institutional and expert capacity for monitoring and evaluating planning results with respect to social, economic, and environmental benefits for local communities.

Keywords

Energy transition Strategic spatial planning Integrated approach Indicators Local governance Bulgaria 

References

  1. Bertaud A (2004) Thespatial structures of Central and Eastern European cities: more European than socialist? In: International symposium on post-communist cities, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 17–19 June 2004. http://alainbertaud.com/AB_Files/AB_Central%20European%20Spatial%20Structure_Figures_2.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  2. Biresselioglu ME, Burov A, Carrus G, Demir MH, Dimitrova E, Fritsche I, Kaplan MD, Klöckner CA, Koksvik G, Masson T, Mutafchiiska I, Panno A, Røyrvik J, Schwarzinger S, Skjølsvold TS, Tasheva M, Tiberio L, Velte D, Vesely S (2017) Social science perspectives on electric mobility, smart energy technologies, and energy use in buildings—a comprehensive literature review, ECHOES Report NECHOES 3.1.-D3.1 Literature ReviewGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):296–312. American Planning Association, Chicago, ILCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davoudi S (2010) Why territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion? In: Presentation, Network Conference 2010 on Territorial Cohesion in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe—Challenges ahead for Strategic Planning and Urban-Regional Governance, Belgrade, Serbia, 22–24 Sept 2010. http://www.spa-ce.net/pdf/2010/spa-ce.net%202010%20-%20Davoudi.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  5. Dimitrova E (2007) Testing PETUS: expectations and outcomes of the theory—practice dialogue on urban sustainability. Indoor Built Environ 16(3):216–225. International Society of the Built Environment, SAGE PublicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimitrova E (2012) Socio-spatial dimensions in sustainable resource and energy management in Bulgaria. In: Proceedings, 26th AESOP annual conference, METU, 11–15 July 2–12, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitrova E, Burov A (2010) Current challenges and innovative approaches in the development of peripheral regions in Bulgaria (the case of Ivaylovgrad municipality). Spatium Int Rev 23:1–8. Belgrade, SerbiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitrova E, Burov A, Nakova K (2014) Bulgaria. In: Jones P et al (еds) COST Action TU1104—smart energy regions. The Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, pp 33–43Google Scholar
  9. EC (2007) Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. Adopted by the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion. www.eufunds.bg/document/355. Accessed 23.04.2018
  10. EC (2010) Toledo Declaration. Adopted by the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development in Toledo, 22 June 2010. http://urban-intergroup.eu/wp-content/files_mf/es2010itoledodeclaration.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  11. EC (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed by the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011 in Gödöllő, Hungary. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2011/territorial-agenda-of-the-european-union-2020. Accessed 23.04.2018
  12. EC (2012) Directive 2012 on Energy Efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. EC (2015) Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: accelerating the European Energy System Transformation. Communication from the Commission C (2015) 6317 final, 15.9.2015, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_EN_ACT_part1_v8_0.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  14. EC (2016a) Good Practice in Energy Efficiency: for a sustainable, safer and more competitive Europe. REMOURBAN project (Regeneration MOdel for accelerating the smart URBAN transformation), Smart City Network. http://www.remourban.eu/Technical-Insights/Insights/Good-Practice-In-Energy-Efficiency.kl. Accessed 23.04. 2018
  15. EC (2016b) Urban Agenda for the EU (‘Pact of Amsterdam’). Agreed by the Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Urban Matters on 30 May 2016 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/urban-development/agenda/pact-of-amsterdam.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  16. EC/COM (2001) ‘A sustainable Europe for a better world: a European Union strategy for Sustainable Development’ (Commission proposal to the Gothenburg European Council) [COM(2001) 264 final]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0264&from=EN. Accessed 23.04.2018
  17. EC/COM (2005) Review of the sustainable development strategy—a platform for action [COM(2005) 658 final]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l28117&from=EN. Accessed 23.04.2018
  18. EC/COM (2011) Energy Roadmap 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy2020/roadmap/doc/com_2011_8852_en.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  19. EEA (2001) Designing effective assessments: the role of participation, Science and Governanceand Focus. Environmental Issue Repost No. 26Google Scholar
  20. EEA (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe—the ignored challenge. Report No 10/2006. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10/eea_report_10_2006.pdf/view. Accessed 23.04.2018
  21. EEA (2013) Achieving energy efficiency through behaviour change: what does it take? EEA Technical report No 5/2013Google Scholar
  22. EEA-FOEN (European Environment Agency and Federal Office for the Environment) (2016) Urban sprawl in Europe: Joint reportGoogle Scholar
  23. Efficiency First Foundation (2016) Driving competitiveness, energy security and decarbonisation through increased energy productivityGoogle Scholar
  24. ESDP (1999) European spatial development perspective. towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning in Potsdam, May 1999Google Scholar
  25. Girard LF, Cherreta M, de Toro P (2007) Integrated panning and integrated evaluation—theoretical references and methodological approaches. In: Miller D, Patassini D (eds) Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation, urban planning and environment, AshgateGoogle Scholar
  26. Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ICLEI (1995) Charter of European Cities and Towns “Towards Sustainability”. (The Aalborg Charter). European Conference on Sustainable Cities & Towns. http://www.sustainablecities.eu/fileadmin/repository/Aalborg_Charter/Aalborg_Charter_English.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  28. Institute for Energy and Transport (2012) Analysis of energy saving potentials in energy generation: final results. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  29. Khakee A (2003) The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation 9(3):340–352. SAGE PublicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller D, Patassini D (eds) (2007) Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation, urban planning and environment, AshgateGoogle Scholar
  31. MRDPW (Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works) (2007) Operational programme ‘Regional Development’ 2007-2013. DG ‘Programming of Regional Development’, Sofia, http://www.bgregio.eu/en/. Accessed 23.04.2018
  32. MRDPW (2009) Methodological guidelines for the updating of active regional and local development strategies and plans, General Directorate for Regional policy and governance systems, Sofia (in Bulgarian). http://www.mrrb.government.bg/static/media/ups/articles/attachments/85e5bca10edf4bce39cc99f7f87d6776.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  33. MRDPW (Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works) (2011) Opening procedures on contracts under the support for integrated plans for urban regeneration and development scheme. News, 22 June. https://www.eufunds.bg/archive/documents/1310454633.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  34. Naess P (2006) Urban structure matters. Residential location, car dependence and travel behaviour. The RTPI Series. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakova K (2007) Energy efficiency networks in Eastern Europe and capacity building for urban sustainability. The experience of two municipal networks. Indoor Built Environ 16(3):248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olazabal M, Pascual U (2015) Urban low-carbon transitions: cognitive barriers and opportunities. J Clean Prod 109:336–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Partnership on Energy Transition (2017) Orientation Paper—Energy Transition. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/3.orientation_paper_energy_transition.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
  38. POINT Project (2007) (ID: 217207, Funded under: FP7-SSH), How effective are policy indicators?Google Scholar
  39. Republic of Bulgaria, Ministry of Energy (2016) Annual Report on the implementation of the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2014–2020, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  40. REViSITE Coordination Action (2012) www.revisite.eu. Accessed 31.3. 2018
  41. Sen S, Ganguly S (2016) Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development—a discussion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:1170–1181. Accessed 6.10. 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. UN (United Nations) (1992) Earth summit. Agenda 21. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Last accessed 23.04.2018. Accessed 23.04.2018
  43. UN (2015) The Sustainable Development Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 17 Goals to Transform Our World. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/. Accessed 23.04.2018
  44. UN-HABITAT (2016) New Urban Agenda, adopted by HABITAT III conference, Quito, Equador. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2018
  45. Valentin A, Spangenberg J (2000) A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Dimitrova
    • 1
  • Milena Tasheva-Petrova
    • 1
  • Angel Burov
    • 2
  • Irina Mutafchiiska
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urban PlanningUniversity of Architecture, Civil Engineering and GeodesySofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Association of Bulgarian Urban and Regional Planners (ABURP)SofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations