Advertisement

Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

  • Federico Davrieux
  • Luciano Antozzi
  • Mariano Palermo
  • Natan Zundel
Chapter

Abstract

There is no doubt that obesity is an epidemic that affects not only developed but also underdeveloped countries. This “globalization” of the disease has led to the current surgery, as a therapeutic method of this pathology, to evolve in terms of its techniques implemented to patients [1]. Within these evolutions is the single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB) too called one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), which although it has few years of application, many centers of the world have adopted it successfully with good results. This technique has about 15 years, but it is in the last 5 years in which it showed a surprising development [2]. It consists of performing a gastric pouch and a single gastroenteroanastomosis, without Roux-en-Y reconstruction. In this way surgery is achieved with equal or better results with a less anastomosis and all that implies.

We will then develop the technique, results, and conclusions.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Technique Single anastomosis Bypass 

References

  1. 1.
    Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, et al. The incidence of comorbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meydan C, Raziel A, Sakran N, et al. Single anastomosis gastric bypass-comparative short-term outcome study of conversional and primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2016;27:432–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2016;27:1153–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. Mini gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1890–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parmar C, Abdelhalim MA, Mahawar KK, et al. Management of super–super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3504–09.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Davrieux
    • 1
  • Luciano Antozzi
    • 2
  • Mariano Palermo
    • 3
  • Natan Zundel
    • 4
  1. 1.Minimally Invasive SurgeryFundacion DAICIMRosarioArgentina
  2. 2.Department of Bariatric and Esophago-Gastric SurgeryHospital Italiano Regional del SurBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Bariatric SurgeryCentro Cien-DiagnomedBuenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.General SurgeryFiu Herbert Wertheim College of MedicineNorth Miami BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations