Advertisement

Institutional Aspects of Consumer (Co-)Ownership in RE Energy Communities

  • Gloria Baigorrotegui
  • Jens Lowitzsch
Chapter

Abstract

This Annex provides an overview of the examples of consumer (co-)ownership that are reported in the 18 country chapters following the analytical framework developed in Chap.  28. To enable a like-to-like comparison, other than grouping the country examples in the three categories developed, that is, communities of interest, communities of place, and communities of interest and place, we have organized the information on the examples in three columns. The first column summarizes the contractual arrangement and the type of project indicating—where available—the amount of the total investment and giving information on the contributions of the partners involved and legal peculiarities of the model. The second column provides information on the RE technology, the installed capacity, and the geography of the given project. The third column characterizes the participation of the local population, the distribution of benefits, and the drivers and motivations involved. Of course, not all pieces of information described above were always disclosed for the examples reported. To render the financial data comparable, all currencies in the tables have been converted into euro as of October 2018. For the original amounts please consult the individual country chapters.

References

  1. Baigorrotegui, G. (2018). Comunidades Energéticas en Latinoamérica. Notas para situar lo abigarrado de prácticas energo-comunitarias. In G. Baigorrotegui & C. Parker (Eds.), ¿Conectar o desconectar? Energía y Comunidad para las transiciones energéticas. Santiago: Colección IDEA.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, S., & Kunze, C. (2014). Transcending community energy: Collective and politically motivated projects in renewable energy (CPE) across Europe. People, Place and Policy, 8(3), 180–191.Google Scholar
  3. Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cass, N., & Walker, G. (2010). Public roles and socio-technical configurations: Diversity in renewable energy deployment in the UK and its implications. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  5. Desmond, E. (2018). Legitimation in a world at risk. The case of genetically modified crops in India. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devine-Wright, P. (2010). From backyards to places: Public engagement and the emplacement of renewable energy technologies. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public (pp. 57–70). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  7. Feron, S. (2016). Sustainability of off-grid photovoltaic system for rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Sustainability, 8(12), 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feron, S., Heinrichs, H., & Cordero, R. R. (2016). Are the rural electrification efforts in the ecuadorian amazon sustainable? Sustainability, 8(5), 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howe, C., Boyer, D., & Barrera, E. (2015). Wind at the margin of the state: Autonomy and renewable energy development in southern Mexico. In J.-A. McNeish, A. Borchgrevink, & O. Logan (Eds.), Contested powers. The politics of energy and development in Latin America (pp. 92–115). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S., & Steffek, J. (Eds.). (2007). Legitimacy in an age of global politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Jeong, Y., Simcock, N., & Walker, G. (2012). Making power differently: Exploring in motives and meanings of community renewable energy developments in cases from the UK and South Korea. In A. Davies (Ed.), Enterprising communities: Grassroots sustainability innovations (pp. 105–121). Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Opazo, J. (2014). The politics of system innovation for emerging technologies: Understanding the uptake of off-grid renewable electricity in rural Chile. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  13. Simcock, N., Willis, R., & Capener, P. (2016). Cultures of community energy. International case studies. Lancaster: Brirish Academy for Humanity and Social Science and Climate Change Collaboration. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/CoCE_Policy%20brief_online.pdf.
  14. Smith, A. (2005). The alternative technology movement: An analysis of its framing and negotiation of technology development. Research in Human Ecology, 12, 106–119.Google Scholar
  15. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vancea, M., Becker, S., & Kunze, C. (2017). Local embeddedness in community energy projects. A social entrepreneurship perspective. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 75(4), e077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? EnergyPolicy, 36, 497–500.Google Scholar
  18. Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewableenergy. EnergyPolicy, 38, 2655–2663.Google Scholar
  19. Wirth, S. (2014). Community matter: Institutional preconditions for community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 70, 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Estudios Avanzados (IDEA), Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH)SantiagoChile
  2. 2.European University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany

Personalised recommendations