A Case Study for the Promotion of Urban Mobility for Visually Impaired People
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
This chapter presents a case study to promote and enhance transport sustainability by providing a mobile app that allows visually impaired people (VIP) to independently use public transportation. This work is a follow-up of a previous case study, and in this chapter, we present new functionalities available in the mobile app, including a careful and detailed layout definition to improve usability. We also present the new tests made in the field with some associates and that allowed us to make important conclusions regarding the usefulness of such an application as well as future directions.
References
- 1.Soriano F, Samper J, Martinez J, Cirilo R, Carrilo E (2016) Smart cities technologies applied to sustainable transport. Open data management., In: 8th Euro American conference on telematics and information systems (EATIS), 2016Google Scholar
- 2.E. Commission, Action plan on urban mobility COM, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/urban_mobility/action_plan_en.htm
- 3.E. Comission, White paper roadmap to a single european transport area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/strategies/2011_white_paper_en. Accessed 27 Nov 2017
- 4.E. Comission, Urban mobility package: together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/urban_mobility/ump_en. Accessed 27 Nov 2017
- 5.Martins P, Mendes D, Paiva S (2016) Mobile platform for helping visually impaired citizens using public transportation: A case study in a Portuguese Historic Center. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol 5(6):77–81Google Scholar
- 6.Stepnowski A, Kamiński Ł, Demkowicz J Voice maps–the system for navigation of blind in urban area. In: Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on applied computer and applied computational science, 2011, pp 201–206Google Scholar
- 7.Nandish MS, Balaji MC, Prof Shantala CP (2014) An outdoor navigation with voice recognition security application for visually impaired people. Int J Eng Trends Technol 10(10):500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Sohrawordi M, Hossen M, Uddin MP, Nitu AM, Islam MR (2015) Android-based walking assistant for blind and low-vision people suggesting the shortest path using Floyd-Warshall algorithm. J Innov Dev Strateg 9(2):62–69Google Scholar
- 9.Dornhofer M, Bischof W, Krajnc E (2014) Comparison of open source routing services with OpenStreetMap data for blind pedestrians. In: FOSS4G, 2014Google Scholar
- 10.Digole RN, Kulkarni PSM (2015) Smart navigation system for visually impaired person. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 4(7):53–57Google Scholar
- 11.Dlodlo N, Gcaba O, Smith A (2016) Internet of things technologies in smart cities. IST-Africa Conference, 2016.Google Scholar
- 12.Dong X, Zhou J, Hu B, Riekki J, Xiong G, Wang F, Zhu F (2016) A framework of future Innovative Urban Transport. In: 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, 99:19–23.Google Scholar
- 13.Deans C (2015) The design of an intelligent urban transportation system in Jamaica based on the internet of things. In: IEEE SoutheastConference, 2015, pp 1074–1077Google Scholar
- 14.Mrityunjaya DH, Kumar N, Ali S, Kelagadi HM (2010) Smart transportation. In: International conference on IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud, 2010, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- 15.Handte M, Foell S, Wagner S, Kortuem G, Marron PJ (2016) An internet-of-things enabled connected navigation system for urban bus riders. IEEE Internet Things J 3(5):735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Tadic S, Kavadias C, Favenza A, Tsagaris V (2016) GHOST: a novel approach to smart city infrastructures monitoring through GNSS precise positioning. In: IEEE 2nd international smart cities conference: improving the citizens quality of life, ISC2 2016, 2016, no. 641495Google Scholar
- 17.Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or Hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Krug S (2006) Don’t make me think: a common sense approach to web usability. New Riders, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- 19.Graves H, Graves R (2012) A strategic guide to technical communication, 2nd edn. Eurospan Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Saffer D (2007) Designing for interaction – creating smart applications and clever devices. New Riders, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019