Advertisement

FERASAT: A Serendipity-Fostering Faceted Browser for Linked Data

  • Ali Khalili
  • Peter van den Besselaar
  • Klaas Andries de Graaf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10843)

Abstract

Accidental knowledge discoveries occur most frequently during capricious and unplanned search and browsing of data. This type of undirected, random, and exploratory search and browsing of data results in Serendipity – the art of unsought finding. In our previous work we extracted a set of serendipity-fostering design features for developing intelligent user interfaces on Semantic Web and Linked Data browsing environments. The features facilitate the discovery of interesting and valuable facts in (linked) data which were not initially sought for. In this work, we present an implementation of those features called FERASAT. FERASAT provides an adaptive multigraph-based faceted browsing interface to catalyze serendipity while browsing Linked Data. FERASAT is already in use within the domain of science, technology & innovation (STI) studies to allow researchers who are not familiar with Linked Data technologies to explore heterogeneous interlinked datasets in order to observe and interpret surprising facts from the data relevant to policy and innovation studies. In addition to an analysis of the related work, we describe two STI use cases in the paper and demonstrate how different serendipity design features are addressed in those use cases.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank our colleagues from the Knowledge Representation and Reasoning research group at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam for their helpful comments during the development of our Linked Data-based faceted browser. This work was supported by a grant from the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme provided for the project RISIS (GA no. 313082).

References

  1. 1.
    Arenas, M., Grau, B.C., Kharlamov, E., Marciuska, S., Zheleznyakov, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, E.: SemFacet: semantic faceted search over yago. In: 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2014, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 7–11 April 2014, Companion Volume, pp. 123–126 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Vocht, L., Coppens, S., Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Mannens, E., Van de Walle, R.: Discovering meaningful connections between resources in the web of data. In: LDOW (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eichler, J.S.A., et al.: Searching linked data with a twist of serendipity. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 495–510. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferré, S.: Expressive and scalable query-based faceted search over SPARQL endpoints. In: Mika, P., Tudorache, T., Bernstein, A., Welty, C., Knoblock, C., Vrandečić, D., Groth, P., Noy, N., Janowicz, K., Goble, C. (eds.) ISWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8797, pp. 438–453. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harth, A.: VisiNav: a system for visual search and navigation on web data. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 8(4), 348–354 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heim, P., Ertl, T., Ziegler, J.: Facet graphs: complex semantic querying made easy. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 288–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hildebrand, M., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: /facet: a browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 272–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11926078_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoefler, P., Granitzer, M., Veas, E.E., Seifert, C.: Linked data query wizard: a novel interface for accessing SPARQL endpoints. In: LDOW (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karger, D., Schraefel, M.: The pathetic fallacy of RDF. In: SWUI (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khalili, A., de Graaf, K.A.: Linked data reactor: towards data-aware user interfaces. In: 2017 SEMANTiCS. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khalili, A., Loizou, A., van Harmelen, F.: Adaptive linked data-driven web components: building flexible and reusable semantic web interfaces. In: Sack, H., Blomqvist, E., d’Aquin, M., Ghidini, C., Ponzetto, S.P., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9678, pp. 677–692. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalili, A., Meroño-Peñuela, A.: WYSIWYQ - what you see is what you query. In: Ivanova, V., Lambrix, P., Lohmann, S., Pesquita, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data Co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vienna, Austria, 22 October 2017, vol. 1947, pp. 123–130. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khalili, A., van Andel, P., den Besselaar, P.V., de Graaf, K.A.: Fostering serendipitous knowledge discovery using an adaptive multigraph-based faceted browser. In: Corcho, Ó., Janowicz, K., Rizzo, G., Tiddi, I., Garijo, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference, K-CAP 2017, Austin, TX, USA, 4–6 December 2017, pp. 15:1–15:4. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maccatrozzo, V., Terstall, M., Aroyo, L., Schreiber, G.: SIRUP: serendipity in recommendations via user perceptions. In: IUI 2017, pp. 35–44. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books Inc., New York (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunes, T., Schwabe, D.: Towards the design of expressive data exploration environments. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data Co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017), Vienna, Austria, 22 October 2017, pp. 60–74 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramakrishnan, N., Grama, A.Y.: Data mining: from serendipity to science. Computer 32(8), 34–37 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saleem, M., Kamdar, M.R., Iqbal, A., Sampath, S., Deus, H.F., Ngonga, A.-C.: Fostering serendipity through big linked data. In: ISWC SemWeb Challenge (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Andel, P.: Anatomy of the unsought finding. serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 45(2), 631–648 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Organization Science, Faculty of Social SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations